EastTNVol6240
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2017
- Messages
- 2,392
- Likes
- 3,215
This Head Coach and staff seek to fill needs for true openings or more depth. We're not at a dumpster sale thankfully. I had forgotten we are still under a scholly reduction at least this recruiting class. Not sure if over or more time must be served.Did you see Kentucky and SC play? I hope they’re running circles. We’d just idiots on a forum. I suspect the staff are chasing what we need. Truth be told you don’t want to be the team having to raid the portal. This means you’re in a bad place.
It’s been very disappointing for sure that we haven’t been doing much or getting many players in the portal this year and our recruiting class which at one time was ranked 7 has dropped to 14. Kentucky and Souh Carolina and Ole Miss are running circles around us right now in the portal.
only if your mind takes you there and apparently it did. You and the BOOM! guy with his showing White House getting blown up are two Oscar Mayer contestants for sure.
This ^What issues?
So far 10 have gone into the portal from UT. Which should we have kept?
The UT staff was clearly concentrating on keeping players they value rather than churning the roster. Should we recruit Mays or go take a chance in the portal? You think USCe will go into the portal and get a better WR than Wells?
Speaking of NIL, what happens if the Supreme Court rules that universities have to pay the players? Does NIL go away, or does that just go hand in hand with paying them? What happens in that era, how can the players get NIL and a salary from the school they play for? Is this the beginning of the end for college athletics? Just some random ?'s that ran through my mind.It’s a whole new game with NIL. There’s definitely a cap to how much we can give to a single player. Spreading that around the roster is gonna be tough. I don’t think I’m going to like where this goes but it’s not going to go away, dealing with unconstrained “free-agency” every off-season is the new norm
seen lots of booms for recruits. Never one of White House exploding. You think its OK then so be it. Thats our capital of our nation. Just think in poor taste though I'm sure the user of it probably didn't have it in mind. You think White House exploding is cool so be it. Just may show how little respect we have for it these days. The fact that posting that didn't even possibly draw a pause speaks potential volumes of what is ok now. Some may just flush 9-11 from their mindsets. That's my problem with it sir. Wasn't a small child when the movie came out or the one that this GIF was from if not the same. So no Lee Greenwood singing God Bless the USA as would kinda contradict bombing White House as ok. We move on as I think I'm probably in the silent majority of those who were/are offended by inclusion of the post.What's your problem with the white house boom gif? Were you spanked as a child during the Independence Day movie? It's commonly used in the recruiting forum for big commits and never saw anyone complain about it before.
Probably wouldn't find ourselves at same type of parties. Actually circles I run in tell me they were glad my bride and I came. Your agreeing with the ED innuendo gives a snapshot of what some think was/is cute versus just not going there into sordid tastelessness. Best book ever written very clear on "coarse jesting."On a scale of 1-10 at parties, I bet you're a solid 4
There’s less substitution in football and especially on the offensive side for our style of play.I see so many going in and I understand that doesn’t mean they are leaving, but I don’t really see any coming in.
I see SC seemingly adding left and right and they are an absolute train wreck and then Missouri is the flavor of the moment, but there is no history there to think that it won’t turn around the other way in the near future.
Technically, NIL doesn’t come from the school, it’s between the player and whatever entity agrees to pay for their name, image, or likeness in order to represent or market their product or business. As far as schools paying players, that’s probably going to happen, my question would be this, could that agreement include a minimum period of time a player would be required to remain with that school? Something like a 3-4 year contract for example. And how would that even be enforceable. Players graduate early, declare early, so many moving parts it’s crazy!Speaking of NIL, what happens if the Supreme Court rules that universities have to pay the players? Does NIL go away, or does that just go hand in hand with paying them? What happens in that era, how can the players get NIL and a salary from the school they play for? Is this the beginning of the end for college athletics? Just some random ?'s that ran through my mind.
Just like pros like the Kelce brothers doing all kinds of NIL commercials, yes.Speaking of NIL, what happens if the Supreme Court rules that universities have to pay the players? Does NIL go away, or does that just go hand in hand with paying them? What happens in that era, how can the players get NIL and a salary from the school they play for? Is this the beginning of the end for college athletics? Just some random ?'s that ran through my mind.
You're right about those being NIL deals for the Kelce Brothers, but they also have contracts with the Chiefs and Eagles that pay them according to the terms of their contracts. Their contracts are a result of their play on the field and the value the teams place on them.Just like pros like the Kelce brothers doing all kinds of NIL commercials, yes.
Aside from the use of their team logos, which the NFL can control, those two guys seem to be all over TV. Those are NIL deals.
NIL deals will still be there. They're legally not going anywhere, nor will schools or the NCAA restrict them beyond morality, embarrassment to the league clauses like the pros.You're right about those being NIL deals for the Kelce Brothers, but they also have contracts with the Chiefs and Eagles that pay them according to the terms of their contracts. Their contracts are a result of their play on the field and the value the teams place on them.
My question is concerning paying players along with NIL deals. The Supreme Court is probably going to rule for the athletes, giving them employee status. So how will that work? NIL already makes it a matter of who gives them the best offer, and employee status means they can negotiate with the schools that are recruiting them for the best deal.
So how is that gonna affect college athletics? Some teams will get the best players because they can afford them, while others will get the players left over. What are your (collective) thoughts?
Why not WR? Our WR core wasnt very good this year.UT is focused on getting the senior lineman to return with NIL monies. That has been a major focus and seems to be working. They have also been working on TE and DBs from the portal. Those will happen but you're not going to see massive additions from the portal.
Unfortunately, you and I are in agreement on this. That was my whole reason for asking the question. I don't see how this won't destroy college athletics. The sad part for me is that these athletes know as they are growing up and improving their skills, that their athletic abilities are what is paying for their education. Not to mention how much they will make as a professional athlete.NIL deals will still be there. They're legally not going anywhere, nor will schools or the NCAA restrict them beyond morality, embarrassment to the league clauses like the pros.
Salaries will be via collective bargaining with a players union, most likely. This is what will suck because schools will NEVER be able to pay the volleyball team, lacrosse team, etc but it will be difficult to say "these athletes are employees, but those athletes aren't" at the schools.
Schools will either get out of athletics or at least drop a lot of sports to lower the payroll. Some smaller schools will never be able to pay players and unless the courts somehow "draw a line around the revenue schools," lots of athletes in D2 and D3 won't have the chance to compete.
That's why this is a big, big deal. It's a terrible mess and I'm unsure anything can prevent college athletics from being completely destroyed.