I've been a TN fan since the day I was born in UT hospital, but this is one of the most idiotic statements I've seen made in a while. I hate Spurrier for what he did to us most games as a fan, but having any knowledge of the sport you can't deny that what he did at Duke, making UF relevant, and making USCe a job worth having are all vastly difficult and not just any coach could've done it. In fact, I'd argue what he has done at USCe and UF combined is far more impressive than Saban at Bama. Why? Because winning at Bama in Football is like winning at KY in Basketball, anyone can do it for the most part. UF is relevant today because of Spurrier and USCe is as well, two SEC schools decades apart by the same guy.
As for comparing him to Neyland or Bryant... no he's not on the same level as those two, because those are two of the best coaches in CFB history, and arguably 2 of the top 5. But very few will argue that he's not 3rd behind the two of them for winning at such a high level at two schools, and most importantly, for changing the scope of college football in the 90's with his Fun N' Gun offense. The impact of that offense's success is one huge reason we see the spread so much in today's SEC and CFB world.
If we did Mt. Rushmore of SEC football coaches its Bryant and Neyland #1A and #1B (fans can argue over it) but the next guy is Spurrier. From there you can argue over #4, but I'd personally put Saban for winning so much at two different schools, though those two schools have elite in state talent (LSU) or natural recruiting advantages (Bama.) Some will argue Saban ahead of Spurrier, but I think we can all agree Spurrier at Bama or LSU in the same time period as Saban is a terrifying thought, because Spurrier has had some great talent in his days, but never to the level Saban has almost consistently had.