Post Your Voter Fraud Evidence Here

#2,951
#2,951
DonjoVol said:
So if these Trump backed candidates were more specific about Biden and why he is to blame for rising inflation you would consider voting for them?
Click to expand...
No ... but independent voters likely would. It doesn't do much good to bring up inflation, if you can't explain the cause of it, or what should be done now to try and counter-act it.
 
#2,952
#2,952
BowlBrother85 said:
No ... but independent voters likely would. It doesn't do much good to bring up inflation, if you can't explain the cause of it, or what should be done now to try and counter-act it.
Click to expand...
So it's not about policy to you. It's about opposition to Trump or anyone else you see as a threat to your beloved political party.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#2,953
#2,953
DonjoVol said:
So it's not about policy to you. It's about opposition to Trump or anyone else you see as a threat to your beloved political party.
Click to expand...
No, I didn't say that. The reasons I am a liberal are policy-driven. I believe in government regulation/protections. I also believe in the role of NATO in our security.
 
#2,955
#2,955
BowlBrother85 said:
No, I didn't say that. The reasons I am a liberal are policy-driven. I believe in government regulation/protections. I also believe in the role of NATO in our security.
Click to expand...
So you are for government regulations/protections if they are made by Republican governors and legislatures?
 
#2,958
#2,958
VolinWayne said:
You obviously haven't taken the time to listen to any of the videos. There is absolutely nothing that's been taken out of context here.
Click to expand...
Right ... which explains why you can only find this bombshell story on something called "Georgia Record." Makes perfect sense. We have been over this before. She was explaining what Trump campaign officials, and even Kanye West, were trying to get her to publicly say. This is a regurgitation of your 2020 BS.
 
#2,959
#2,959
BowlBrother85 said:
Right ... which explains why you can only find this bombshell story on something called "Georgia Record." Makes perfect sense. We have been over this before. She was explaining what Trump campaign officials, and even Kanye West, were trying to get her to publicly say. This is a regurgitation of your 2020 BS.
Click to expand...


You just admitted that you didn't watch the video. This has nothing to do with the Trump campaign officials or Kanye... These videos and recordings have just been released in the past week so no, we have not discussed any of what we have heard in these videos.
 
#2,960
#2,960
VolinWayne said:
You just admitted that you didn't watch the video. This has nothing to do with the Trump campaign officials or Kanye... These videos and recordings have just been released in the past week so no, we have not discussed any of what we have heard in these videos.
Click to expand...
Wrong. She has discussed this at length. She is relaying that Trump officials were trying to get her to say that there was fraud and she refused. Are you really this gullible? Find a 2nd source that is reporting this video as being evidence of voter fraud. If you are correct, then that shouldn't be a problem for you. This would be a big development... but like always, you are just passing along more far-right misinformation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ClearwaterVol
#2,961
#2,961
VolinWayne said:
You just admitted that you didn't watch the video. This has nothing to do with the Trump campaign officials or Kanye... These videos and recordings have just been released in the past week so no, we have not discussed any of what we have heard in these videos.
Click to expand...

You've been unsuccessfully tilting at windmills for more than two years. Every stupid video that I have watched because you claimed it was the smoking gun has made very unlikely to watch anything you suggest. You have got to be exhausted from switching gears so much as each of your claims has been shown to be false.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RockyTop85 and BowlBrother85
#2,962
#2,962
BowlBrother85 said:
No, I didn't say that. The reasons I am a liberal are policy-driven. I believe in government regulation/protections. I also believe in the role of NATO in our security.
Click to expand...


* Believing in government is your first mistake. Government was not intended to be this big. When it does it starts to eat everything else to sustain itself as we are seeing.

* As far as NATO, it's like any other relationship. As long as all parties are putting in equal effort that they agreed on it is worth it but when you have one side supporting everybody while others watch your stupidity then it's not going to work long-term without resetting expectations.
 
#2,964
#2,964
jvol1 said:
Arizona judge declines to sanction Kari Lake for lawsuit challenging election

Maybe next time for lake. When a judge heard the evidence for cheating, it turned out to not be very good. Not happy about the sore loser syndrome effecting some republicans. Time to let it go and move on.
Click to expand...

The accuser can't have real evidence of cheating in an election because the state has the evidence and the accuser only has allegations. Allegations are enough for a criminal prosecutor to initiate a court case where the evidence is discussed and weighed; but in voting fraud, allegations aren't enough to force the evidence into the light; so factual information just stays locked away and we never do anything to improve the system.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88 and VolinWayne
#2,965
#2,965
AM64 said:
The accuser can't have real evidence of cheating in an election because the state has the evidence and the accuser only has allegations. Allegations are enough for a criminal prosecutor to initiate a court case where the evidence is discussed and weighed; but in voting fraud, allegations aren't enough to force the evidence into the light; so factual information just stays locked away and we never do anything to improve the system.
Click to expand...
Without material, tangible evidence, what are election fraud allegations based on? Conjecture .... Right?
 
#2,966
#2,966
BowlBrother85 said:
Without material, tangible evidence, what are election fraud allegations based on? Conjecture .... Right?
Click to expand...

A house goes up in flames and somebody has seen someone running away with a can. The "witness" has no actual proof that the other person was near the house, caused the fire, or had anything flammable in the can. I guess you can call the "witness's" story conjecture, but somebody else is going to have to put some actual legwork into deciding if the fire was arson or just circumstances and unrelated. If a DA has enough confidence in the witness, some evidence of possible arson, and enough from the witness to pick a suspect, the case goes to court. The DA rarely has proof; he has conjecture, and generally a lot of documentation saying "maybe". So why in the case of suspected vote fraud, are the accusers supposed to have solid proof when they have no access to ballots, machines, etc? Why can someone be a viable witness and cause a case go to court in so many other things, but that's never the same bar for alleged voting fraud?
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne
#2,967
#2,967
AM64 said:
A house goes up in flames and somebody has seen someone running away with a can. The "witness" has no actual proof that the other person was near the house, caused the fire, or had anything flammable in the can. I guess you can call the "witness's" story conjecture, but somebody else is going to have to put some actual legwork into deciding if the fire was arson or just circumstances and unrelated. If a DA has enough confidence in the witness, some evidence of possible arson, and enough from the witness to pick a suspect, the case goes to court. The DA rarely has proof; he has conjecture, and generally a lot of documentation saying "maybe". So why in the case of suspected vote fraud, are the accusers supposed to have solid proof when they have no access to ballots, machines, etc? Why can someone be a viable witness and cause a case go to court in so many other things, but that's never the same bar for alleged voting fraud?
Click to expand...
It would depend heavily on what the eye witness actually observed. Your analogy is very broad.
 
#2,969
#2,969
BowlBrother85 said:
Right ... which explains why you can only find this bombshell story on something called "Georgia Record." Makes perfect sense. We have been over this before. She was explaining what Trump campaign officials, and even Kanye West, were trying to get her to publicly say. This is a regurgitation of your 2020 BS.
Click to expand...
So because MSM isn't picking up the story. Then it's obviously not true.......is that what your getting at?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#2,970
#2,970
whodeycin85 said:
So because MSM isn't picking up the story. Then it's obviously not true.......is that what your getting at?
Click to expand...
Not just the main stream ... but literally nobody else is reporting this as evidence except for this one garbage site - Georgia Record.

Not Breitbart. Not OAN. Not Newsmax. Not The Daily Caller. Not The Washington Times. Not The New York Post. These are right-wing leaning media outlets, who would not hesitate to report this, if it was legitimate.
 
#2,971
#2,971
BowlBrother85 said:
Not just the main stream ... but literally nobody else is reporting this as evidence except for this one garbage site - Georgia Record.

Not Breitbart. Not OAN. Not Newsmax. Not The Daily Caller. Not The Washington Times. Not The New York Post. These are right-wing leaning media outlets, who would not hesitate to report this, if it was legitimate.
Click to expand...
So for the record....when Reuters picked up the story they only had partial of the body cam... This is the fully released version and she openly admits fraud....but to think that as we are now learn about the FBI an DOJ suppressing information for encouragement of not releasing misinformation...larger and more mainstream news sources are not going to run with it right away...they will verify the info then report...GR was just the first to do it more will follow...but to believe that something is untrue because only 1 source reports it...it naive at best.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#2,972
#2,972
whodeycin85 said:
So for the record....when Reuters picked up the story they only had partial of the body cam... This is the fully released version and she openly admits fraud....but to think that as we are now learn about the FBI an DOJ suppressing information for encouragement of not releasing misinformation...larger and more mainstream news sources are not going to run with it right away...they will verify the info then report...GR was just the first to do it more will follow...but to believe that something is untrue because only 1 source reports it...it naive at best.....
Click to expand...
No ... she is relaying what the Trump campaign was pressuring her to "admit" to. Nobody else will touch this, because it's not what you say it is.
 
#2,973
#2,973
BowlBrother85 said:
No ... she is relaying what the Trump campaign was pressuring her to "admit" to. Nobody else will touch this, because it's not what you say it is.
Click to expand...
That's not what she is saying in the rest of the video....watch it....or a least read the transcript...don't just bury you head because something has been dismissed already without a full video
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne
#2,974
#2,974
whodeycin85 said:
That's not what she is saying in the rest of the video....watch it....or a least read the transcript...don't just bury you head because something has been dismissed already without a full video
Click to expand...
She has already explained that this is what she was being pressured to say by Republicans... she and her daughter were being harassed. She testified before Congress that the "suitcases full of ballots" was a lie. This has been debunked. Once again, show me another outlet (literally anyone) who is reporting this as evidence.
 
#2,975
#2,975
BowlBrother85 said:
She has already explained that this is what she was being pressured to say by Republicans... she and her daughter were being harassed. She testified before Congress that the "suitcases full of ballots" was a lie. This has been debunked. Once again, show me another outlet (literally anyone) who is reporting this as evidence.
Click to expand...
And clearly she says she lied to he committee. In the full video...if your not gonna watch..then don comment...it clear as day...I know that hard to see with your head where it is...but I'm done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and VolinWayne
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top