Post Your Voter Fraud Evidence Here

And clearly she says she lied to he committee. In the full video...if your not gonna watch..then don comment...it clear as day...I know that hard to see with your head where it is...but I'm done.
No, she has explained that this is what she was being pressured into saying by the Trump campaign. She does not admit to having perjured herself. That is ridiculous. Get back to me when literally any other outlet has treated this as evidence of election fraud. Ruby Freeman and her daughter have stated under oath that there was none ... even after being harassed by Trump and his minions. No adult should be this gullible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ClearwaterVol
Does anybody remember Ruby Freeman from the 2020 election?? Looks like at one point she was wanting to come forward as a Whistleblower. She is recorded saying "it's all a fraud".

Newly uncovered police body cam footage of Ruby Freeman reveal her stunning admissions that directly contradict allegations made under oath by January 6th Committee witnesses, by certain reporters and show hosts, by members of Congress, and by lawyers in sworn statements to Federal Court. Freeman volunteers to blow the whistle on election fraud.
In the body cam, Ruby Freeman alleges a coverup by the Georgia Secretary of State, the DOJ/FBI, the GBI, and the Fulton County DA.
911 call transcript, body cam videos, and police report were obtained by Open Record Requests. From that information investigators have learned that the police report was supplemented in contradiction of the facts.
Ruby Freeman’s lawyer since January 2021 is Michael Gottlieb who also was lawyer and fixer for Hunter Biden and Aaron Rich, brother to Seth Rich.

UPDATE FULL VIDEO ADDITION: Ruby Freeman Body Cam Admissions Revealed In The Georgia Ballot Scanning Scandal
Key participants in the harassment of Ruby Freeman and her daughter, Shaye Moss, were Harrison Floyd and Trevian Kutti. They are both mentioned in your link. Their roles are detailed here, in how they were trying to pressure Ruby Freeman into admitting to bogus fraud allegations, which she has steadfastly denied.

Special Report: Trump aide set up meeting where election worker was pressured


Once again, you are over-hyping a bogus story which is only being discussed in one (biased) outlet. You do this all the time.
 
There are Ruby Freeman quotes from the full body cam. the Reuters link and other outlets on my cover the first 20 to 30 minutes of the footage..

View attachment 527532View attachment 527533View attachment 527534View attachment 527535
.... and this link below is context : The "TK" cited in your "transcript" along with Ruby Freeman is a publicist named Trevian Kutti, who specifically sought out Ruby Freeman for the purpose of trying to pressure her into making false confessions to bogus fraud allegations concerning the 2020 Presidential Election, which she refused to do. Trevian Kutti falsely told Ruby Freeman that she was about to be arrested, and that by admitting to having committed fraud, she could be granted immunity. It was a coercive lie ... but still, according to police records, Freeman never buckled.

This link covers it pretty well.

Exclusive-Two election workers break silence after enduring Trump backers' threats
 
.... and this link below is context : The "TK" cited in your "transcript" along with Ruby Freeman is a publicist named Trevian Kutti, who specifically sought out Ruby Freeman for the purpose of trying to pressure her into making false confessions to bogus fraud allegations concerning the 2020 Presidential Election, which she refused to do. Trevian Kutti falsely told Ruby Freeman that she was about to be arrested, and that by admitting to having committed fraud, she could be granted immunity. It was a coercive lie ... but still, according to police records, Freeman never buckled.

This link covers it pretty well.

Exclusive-Two election workers break silence after enduring Trump backers' threats
She was speaking with FLoyd for part as well...and there is no threats made in the over hour footage...your reaching and ignoring proof...I expected nothing less..good evening
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne
She was speaking with FLoyd for part as well...and there is no threats made in the over hour footage...your reaching and ignoring proof...I expected nothing less..good evening
I'm not doing anything but posting links to Reuters. The last one states very clearly that from police records Freeman did not admit to the allegations of fraud being peddled by Kutti... and Freeman asserts that Kutti did falsely tell her that she would be arrested soon, but could be granted immunity if she confessed to crimes that she had not committed.

"Georgia Record" is not only cherry-picking quotes but also omitting important context concerning the very clear agenda of Harrison Floyd and Trevian Kutti and their coercive lies.
 
I'm not doing anything but posting links to Reuters. The last one states very clearly that from police records Freeman did not admit to the allegations of fraud being peddled by Kutti... and Freeman asserts that Kutti did falsely tell her that she would be arrested soon, but could be granted immunity if she confessed to crimes that she had not committed.

"Georgia Record" is not only cherry-picking quotes but also omitting important context concerning the very clear agenda of Harrison Floyd and Trevian Kutti and their coercive lies.
The GR has the whole hour and 9 minutes posted....and you can listen to the conversation....there's no cherry picking...you just refuse to believe anything beyond what you MSM brain can process....to each their own...
 
The accuser can't have real evidence of cheating in an election because the state has the evidence and the accuser only has allegations. Allegations are enough for a criminal prosecutor to initiate a court case where the evidence is discussed and weighed; but in voting fraud, allegations aren't enough to force the evidence into the light; so factual information just stays locked away and we never do anything to improve the system.
Nice circular logic. If you have no evidence, there's no basis for making an allegation, or at least no reason to think it would be taken seriously. So basically you're saying when you lose an election without any evidence of cheating it's because the cabal was out to get you and then saying they're just suppressing the evidence, basically just being a sore loser. This is a weak sauce approach to pretty much anything. Evidence is the first thing you need in this type of situation, suspicion by itself is worthless and weak minded.
 
The GR has the whole hour and 9 minutes posted....and you can listen to the conversation....there's no cherry picking...you just refuse to believe anything beyond what you MSM brain can process....to each their own...
BS.

Ruby Freeman has been very consistent. Trevian Kutti tried to coerce her into admitting to bogus fraud allegations and she wouldn't do it. If Freeman had admitted to the allegations, it would be a bombshell, and at least one other outlet besides just "Georgia Record" would be reporting this. However, Georgia Record is all you have.
 
BS.

Ruby Freeman has been very consistent. Trevian Kutti tried to coerce her into admitting to bogus fraud allegations and she wouldn't do it. If Freeman had admitted to the allegations, it would be a bombshell, and at least one other outlet besides just "Georgia Record" would be reporting this. However, Georgia Record is all you have.
Your whole argument is only the GR is picking this up... Lol. We have just seen from Twitter and other SM sites how they were pressured to stop the hunter Biden story... So the fact that only GR has picked it up. Means squat.... It's not an anonymous source. It's straight outta her mouth.... Hilarious you thinking someone admitting something isn't true unless MSM runs with it..... Your not longer with the time..
 
Your whole argument is only the GR is picking this up... Lol. We have just seen from Twitter and other SM sites how they were pressured to stop the hunter Biden story... So the fact that only GR has picked it up. Means squat.... It's not an anonymous source. It's straight outta her mouth.... Hilarious you thinking someone admitting something isn't true unless MSM runs with it..... Your not longer with the time..
No.

My whole argument is that Trevian Kutti was sent by Harrison Floyd to coerce Ruby Freeman into confessing to crimes that she has steadfastly denied committing. Kutti lied to Freeman, and told her that she would be arrested soon, and that she could be granted immunity if she would "cooperate" with the Trump campaign. Ruby Freeman has been very consistent that she did not observe any election fraud. The "suitcase" allegation has been thoroughly debunked. It is also true that "Georgia Record" is the only outlet which has reported this as a true confession. That would not be the case if it was legitimate.
 
Nice circular logic. If you have no evidence, there's no basis for making an allegation, or at least no reason to think it would be taken seriously. So basically you're saying when you lose an election without any evidence of cheating it's because the cabal was out to get you and then saying they're just suppressing the evidence, basically just being a sore loser. This is a weak sauce approach to pretty much anything. Evidence is the first thing you need in this type of situation, suspicion by itself is worthless and weak minded.

So tell me where would you, as a common citizen, get evidence of election fraud? Remember accusations by poll watchers and probably by poll workers are just allegations and not proof. Or is this simply a case where your team won this one and you aren't bothered by the fact that the process may be corrupt. But the real question still stands. How would you or anyone else outside the process get your hands on evidence of fraud?
 
So tell me where would you, as a common citizen, get evidence of election fraud? Remember accusations by poll watchers and probably by poll workers are just allegations and not proof. Or is this simply a case where your team won this one and you aren't bothered by the fact that the process may be corrupt. But the real question still stands. How would you or anyone else outside the process get your hands on evidence of fraud?
Especially when swollen affidavits, 1000s mind are not enough to get a court case and be used as evidence.
 
So tell me where would you, as a common citizen, get evidence of election fraud? Remember accusations by poll watchers and probably by poll workers are just allegations and not proof. Or is this simply a case where your team won this one and you aren't bothered by the fact that the process may be corrupt. But the real question still stands. How would you or anyone else outside the process get your hands on evidence of fraud?
That's just the way our legal system works -- the burden is on the accuser to provide the evidence. Ideally a poll worker or someone with knowledge of the cheating would testify. I'd think you'd want at least that before going to court for fraud. The notion of a vast conspiracy is extremely far fetched. There are too many people involved and people are too honest generally for that to work out. Maybe you should refine your stereotypes of dem/govt corruption in light of this lack of evidence. It seems like there might be a case that the technical glitches in the election might in and of themselves might warrant a run off. I'm not sure whether that's been explored by lake or not. I couldnt care less who wins an election in Arizona. Mostly, I'm concerned by the perception that there's gross fraud in our elections and hope that you might consider the possibility that that's not the case here.
 
That's just the way our legal system works -- the burden is on the accuser to provide the evidence. Ideally a poll worker or someone with knowledge of the cheating would testify. I'd think you'd want at least that before going to court for fraud. The notion of a vast conspiracy is extremely far fetched. There are too many people involved and people are too honest generally for that to work out. Maybe you should refine your stereotypes of dem/govt corruption in light of this lack of evidence. It seems like there might be a case that the technical glitches in the election might in and of themselves might warrant a run off. I'm not sure whether that's been explored by lake or not. I couldnt care less who wins an election in Arizona. Mostly, I'm concerned by the perception that there's gross fraud in our elections and hope that you might consider the possibility that that's not the case here.


There have been quite a few poll workers who came forward and testified under oath. Their testimonies mean nothing.
 
Here Are The Media Outlets That Received 'The Ruby Freeman Video Files' In 2021 And Said Nothing


Below are news outlets that also filed open records requests for the information. The ORRs were CONDUCTED OVER A YEAR AGO.

They did nothing.

The American public should know who they are.

PROPUBLICA - December 13, 2021

INDEPENDENT - December 13, 2021

CNN - December 13, 2021

WASHINGTON POST - December 13, 2021

TALKING POINTS MEMO - December 10, 2021

RACHEL MADDOW SHOW - December 16, 2021

WASHINGTON EXAMINER - December 13, 2021

FOX 5 (ATLANTA) - December 13, 2021

11 ALIVE (ATLANTA) - December 10, 2021

REUTERS - December 16, 2021, December 7, 2021, December 6, 2021, December 4, 2021, November 30, 2021, November 29, 2021

AJC - December 14, 2021
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
Here Are The Media Outlets That Received 'The Ruby Freeman Video Files' In 2021 And Said Nothing


Below are news outlets that also filed open records requests for the information. The ORRs were CONDUCTED OVER A YEAR AGO.

They did nothing.

The American public should know who they are.

PROPUBLICA - December 13, 2021

INDEPENDENT - December 13, 2021

CNN - December 13, 2021

WASHINGTON POST - December 13, 2021

TALKING POINTS MEMO - December 10, 2021

RACHEL MADDOW SHOW - December 16, 2021

WASHINGTON EXAMINER - December 13, 2021

FOX 5 (ATLANTA) - December 13, 2021

11 ALIVE (ATLANTA) - December 10, 2021

REUTERS - December 16, 2021, December 7, 2021, December 6, 2021, December 4, 2021, November 30, 2021, November 29, 2021

AJC - December 14, 2021

One of the weapons today (and one the left really loves) is fact checking. Usually all about how you can twist a word, phrase, or sentence to mean something different from what was said, but occasionally an honest evaluation. But the real insidious thing is the point you are making - deliberately hiding the truth or never addressing an event by just not covering it. It's amazing the news you find that never makes it either into nightly news or many/most of the 24hr propaganda channels. To me that's a lie by omission. If you don't cover a story then it didn't happen apparently, and you don't have to play with rearranging fact to fit the agenda. Joseph Goebbels would be green with envy about how easily stories are manipulated or simply erased these days.
 
One of the weapons today (and one the left really loves) is fact checking. Usually all about how you can twist a word, phrase, or sentence to mean something different from what was said, but occasionally an honest evaluation. But the real insidious thing is the point you are making - deliberately hiding the truth or never addressing an event by just not covering it. It's amazing the news you find that never makes it either into nightly news or many/most of the 24hr propaganda channels. To me that's a lie by omission. If you don't cover a story then it didn't happen apparently, and you don't have to play with rearranging fact to fit the agenda. Joseph Goebbels would be green with envy about how easily stories are manipulated or simply erased these days.


I might add that after seeing the twitter files the "fact checkers" in general have lost a lot of credibility (if they ever had any). Over the past 2 years we had thousands of notorious doctors and scientists get scensored by people who were clueless about what they were scensoring. They were simply snuffing out all opposition and dissenting opinions that went against the narrative being pushed by one side.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wireless1 and AM64
Here Are The Media Outlets That Received 'The Ruby Freeman Video Files' In 2021 And Said Nothing


Below are news outlets that also filed open records requests for the information. The ORRs were CONDUCTED OVER A YEAR AGO.

They did nothing.

The American public should know who they are.

PROPUBLICA - December 13, 2021

INDEPENDENT - December 13, 2021

CNN - December 13, 2021

WASHINGTON POST - December 13, 2021

TALKING POINTS MEMO - December 10, 2021

RACHEL MADDOW SHOW - December 16, 2021

WASHINGTON EXAMINER - December 13, 2021

FOX 5 (ATLANTA) - December 13, 2021

11 ALIVE (ATLANTA) - December 10, 2021

REUTERS - December 16, 2021, December 7, 2021, December 6, 2021, December 4, 2021, November 30, 2021, November 29, 2021

AJC - December 14, 2021

Still gonna hold you authenticity on a single source BB85?
 
These were the news outlets that filed open record requests but then for some reason decided it would be best not to report what was exposed in the videos.
You’d think more than one of them could have found a way to spin this as a lie or fraud
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
I might add that after seeing the twitter files the "fact checkers" in general have lost a lot of credibility (if they ever had any). Over the past 2 years we had thousands of notorious doctors and scientists get scensored by people who were clueless about what they were scensoring. They were simply snuffing out all opposition and dissenting opinions that went against the narrative being pushed by one side.
Elon is planning to carpet bomb Fauci this week. Buckle up folks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and VolinWayne
Wow, still beating on this dead horse.

Just what does the "Nut Case" flavor of kool-aid taste like?

Do you get free shipping if you order it from the InfoWars website?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BowlBrother85

VN Store



Back
Top