Post Your Voter Fraud Evidence Here

[davethevol]

The left is going to say there’s no proof, but that looks like a smoking gun.

 

[just bob]

The left is going to say there’s no proof, but that looks like a smoking gun.

In Fulton County they claimed there was a pipe leak (which there wasn't), evacuated people, then covered windows to prevent the poll watchers from observing the poll workers. Stopped counting at the same time as 5 other states, then resumed counting in secrecy which magically ended with a ton of Biden votes and not Trump votes. Then say there was nothing suspicious. They claim there's no proof because they don't want there to be proof.

 

[VolinWayne]

I am quite certain this has already been debunked many many times by your highness

 

[BowlBrother85]

In Fulton County they claimed there was a pipe leak (which there wasn't), evacuated people, then covered windows to prevent the poll watchers from observing the poll workers. Stopped counting at the same time as 5 other states, then resumed counting in secrecy which magically ended with a ton of Biden votes and not Trump votes. Then say there was nothing suspicious. They claim there's no proof because they don't want there to be proof.

You are conflating Michigan allegations with Georgia's .....

Misinfo about 'suitcases' of ballots and a burst pipe in 2020 return after Trump's Georgia indictment

THE FACTS: In the wake of Trump and 18 of his allies being indicted in Georgia on Monday over their efforts to overturn the former president’s 2020 election loss, years-old false claims about ballot counting in the state are recirculating on social media.

apnews.com

There’s a Simple Reason Workers Covered Windows at a Detroit Vote-Counting Site (Published 2020)

Unfounded rumors about the gathering were shared by President Trump and others.

www.nytimes.com

Trump And Allies Keep Claiming Republican Poll Watchers Were Banned—That’s A Lie

Lawyers from the Trump campaign conceded that observers were admitted inside the room where votes were counted.

www.forbes.com

 

[BowlBrother85]

I am quite certain this has already been debunked many many times by your highness

Indeed, it has .... many times over the last 3 damn years. I will do it once again, however.

 

[BowlBrother85]

The left is going to say there’s no proof, but that looks like a smoking gun.

LOL! This is rich! Yep. "Real Robert" cracked the code after 3 years!

 

[BowlBrother85]

This is a re-hashing of an old "double-scanned ballots" claim made by Tucker Carlson from 2021.

Are you really stupid enough to believe that someone named "Real Robert" on social media is going to be the one to finally come away with the "smoking gun" after 3 damn years???? Seriously? The Cult of Trump would believe any damn thing, which supports their leader's ego.

Fact-checking Tucker Carlson’s Georgia election falsehoods

Fox News host Tucker Carlson promoted a number of false, misleading and unsubstantiated claims about election fraud in G

www.politifact.com

 

[BowlBrother85]

I'm not the one obsessed with Trump here. I rarely even talk about him any more. For myself this whole "stolen election" thing has been about actual election integrity, not about Donald Trump....I'll admit that at one point in my life I did think to highly of Trump but I have finally come to the realization that no earthly man is going to save America.

Just a few pointers for you to consider. If you want anybody in life to take you the least bit serious consider trying to have a conversation without attempting to insult them by calling them names.....and stop with the whole "Trump cult" thing. It really makes you look childish. (Maybe you are a child which would explain it all).

You are completely obsessed and desperate to support your cult leader.

 

[BowlBrother85]

Don't waste your time with BB. It's not worth your time. He still believes "factcheckers" are unbiased. His "debunking" is basically just finding an article that says what he wants it to say which most times does not prove anything but is basically somebody stating that "there's nothing to see here".

My de-bunking is with facts from actual media outlets rather than just lies from The Gateway Pundit and Leading Report .... and social media posts from gullible Trump cult followers, such as yourself. You would believe anything. You really would.

 

[jmacvols1]

This is a re-hashing of an old "double-scanned ballots" claim made by Tucker Carlson from 2021.

Are you really stupid enough to believe that someone named "Real Robert" on social media is going to be the one to finally come away with the "smoking gun" after 3 damn years???? Seriously? The Cult of Trump would believe any damn thing, which supports their leader's ego.

Fact-checking Tucker Carlson’s Georgia election falsehoods

Fox News host Tucker Carlson promoted a number of false, misleading and unsubstantiated claims about election fraud in G

www.politifact.com

Politifact is a leftwing Trump hating source that spins lies itself.

I don't remember any forensic audit of GA computers. It was shown in court last week GA computers could be breached, pass codes bypassed and changes made to votes that would not be recorded that computers forensic audits could not detect.

 

[BowlBrother85]

Politifact is a leftwing Trump hating source that spins lies itself.

I don't remember any forensic audit of GA computers. It was shown in court last week GA computers could be breached, pass codes bypassed and changes made to votes that would not be recorded that computers forensic audits could not detect.

It's hilarious how you complain of bias from left .... but then post a video of Lou Dobbs - who is biased from the right. It's not a bias that bothers you. In fact, a bias is what you are in favor of - as long as it is from the right, and serves your narrative and political agenda.

No system is going to be tamper proof, if unfettered access is granted, including a system of nothing but paper ballots. You continue to ignore the "compensating controls" portion of the report, as well as the conclusion that no evidence of votes being changed during an election, has ever been uncovered. There was a forensic audit of the voting systems in Georgia following the 2020 Presidential Election. It has been discussed at great length in this thread. You are willfully ignorant.

 

[BowlBrother85]

The Cult of Trump will always ignore the fact that even if Trump had won both Arizona and Georgia, he still would have lost the election.

The Cult of Trump should also be able to see for themselves that there is not a scenario or a set of conditions or circumstances in which Donald Trump would ever admit that he lost a fair election. Trump even signaled his intentions to allege that he was cheated months prior to both the 2016 and 2020 Presidential General Elections. Trump is egotistical and very dishonest. Trump has elevated being a sore loser to new heights - with help from people, such as the idiots in this forum, who have carried on this farce for 3 years.

Trump will always blame fraud for any election defeat, regardless of whether or not he can support that contention with any fact-based evidence. That is because Trump knows that his followers are uneducated and gullible and they will treat his claims of fraud/cheating as being established facts as soon they hear them, without any scrutiny paid to his claims whatsoever.

 

[VolTull]

It's hilarious how you complain of bias from left .... but then post a video of Lou Dobbs - who is biased from the right. It's not a bias that bothers you. In fact, a bias is what you are in favor of - as long as it is from the right, and serves your narrative and political agenda.

No system is going to be tamper proof, if unfettered access is granted, including a system of nothing but paper ballots. You continue to ignore the "compensating controls" portion of the report, as well as the conclusion that no evidence of votes being changed during an election, has ever been uncovered. There was a forensic audit of the voting systems in Georgia following the 2020 Presidential Election. It has been discussed at great length in this thread. You are willfully ignorant.

Don't think it's willful at all.

 

[jmacvols1]

George
@BehizyTweets

BREAKING: The Georgia Senate Ethics Committee is now pursuing the complete elimination of QR Codes on ballots after the BOMBSHELL Halderman report revealed hackers could flip votes without leaving a single trace by simply manipulating the QR code

Georgia currently has the most corrupt election system in America. Voters vote on a touchscreen and a ballot is printed with their selections, the generated QR is "supposed" to represent their selection when the tabulator scans the code, but Halderman's report demonstrates how easy it is for bad actors to get in and change anyone's selections without changing the printed text. The printed text could be consistent with the voter's selections but little do they know the QR code could be the complete opposite of what they voted for

This is good news but the legislature should just ban voting machines entirely... I guess baby steps!

 

[Septic]

Politifact is a leftwing Trump hating source that spins lies itself.

LOL

Anyone or anything that isn't hugging trumps nuts is a 'trump hating source', that's precisely why you have to rely on twitter rando's to tell you what to think.

Stay in your echo chamber and keep the "victimhood" circle jerk alive.

 

[jmacvols1]

 

[BowlBrother85]

How does that prove that election fraud was committed? How does that prove that the alleged incident wasn't investigated? You complain about bias, but then post things like this from John Solomon's "Leading Report," as if it should be accepted as being legitimate at face value. Solomon clearly has a political agenda, which involves a very aggressive effort to discredit the outcome of the 2020 Presidential Election. Do you really think that after 3 years of this, that someone like him is going to be the one to finally come away with the smoking gun?

Your desperate need to cling to this fantasy after this much time does reveal a very boring person, with a very boring life. You are naive, ignorant, cultish and gullible.

 

[BowlBrother85]

LOL

Anyone or anything that isn't hugging trumps nuts is a 'trump hating source', that's precisely why you have to rely on twitter rando's to tell you what to think.

Stay in your echo chamber and keep the "victimhood" circle jerk alive.

These people are beyond pathetic. It has been 3 years now. Unreal.

 

[hog88]

These people are beyond pathetic. It has been 3 years now. Unreal.

How many years did you carry on the Putin Gate crap?

 

[BigOrangeMojo]

How does that prove that election fraud was committed? How does that prove that the alleged incident wasn't investigated? You complain about bias, but then post things like this from John Solomon's "Leading Report," as if it should be accepted as being legitimate at face value. Solomon clearly has a political agenda, which involves a very aggressive effort to discredit the outcome of the 2020 Presidential Election. Do you really think that after 3 years of this, that someone like him is going to be the one to finally come away with the smoking gun?

Your desperate need to cling to this fantasy after this much time does reveal a very boring person, with a very boring life. You are naive, ignorant, cultish and gullible.

So the Republican election lawyer for state of MI emailing the Trump era DOJ about what 2 Republican poll watchers saw isn't fraud?

 

[BowlBrother85]

How many years did you carry on the Putin Gate crap?

It always becomes a game of "what-about-ism" with you ....

My primary focus on the matter of the Mueller probe has always been the June 9, 2016 meeting at Trump Tower, which did take place ..... even though both Trump and Trump Jr. lied about it's purpose and who was in attendance.

In general, I believe that story was in the circulation of the main stream media from the time the WikiLeaks releases began in August of 2016, until about six months after Mueller's findings were reported, which was in March of 2019 .... So, to answer your question : the 2016 Trump Campaign / Russian collusion story was a steady part of the news cycle from approximately August of 2016 until September of 2019 - the rough equivalent of 3 years and a month.

"The 2020 Presidential Election was rigged" nonsense has now been ongoing for a solid 3 years and 2 months - beginning from the time Biden was declared the winner in mid-November of 2020 and running through the present day - with no sign of slowing down at all.

 

[BowlBrother85]

So the Republican election lawyer for state of MI emailing the Trump era DOJ about what 2 Republican poll watchers saw isn't fraud?

Right .... The desperation on here is palpable.

 

[GordonC]

It always becomes a game of "what-about-ism" with you ....

My primary focus on the matter of the Mueller probe has always been the June 9, 2016 meeting at Trump Tower, which did take place ..... even though both Trump and Trump Jr. lied about it's purpose and who was in attendance.

In general, I believe that story was in the circulation of the main stream media from the time the WikiLeaks releases began in August of 2016, until about six months after Mueller's findings were reported, which was in March of 2019 .... So, to answer your question : the 2016 Trump Campaign / Russian collusion story was in the news from approximately August of 2016 until September of 2019 - the rough equivalent of 3 years and a month.

"The 2020 Presidential Election was rigged" nonsense has now been ongoing for a solid 3 years and 2 months - beginning from the time Biden was declared the winner in mid-November of 2020 and running through the present day - with no sign of slowing down at all.

It's a question of credibility.
Is it always "what-about-ism" when it points out hypocrisy?
I mean, that's not really directed at you in particular, but this trying to discuss one event in a vacuum and then chirping "what-about-ism" is BS.

 

[DC_Vol]

It always becomes a game of "what-about-ism" with you ....

My primary focus on the matter of the Mueller probe has always been the June 9, 2016 meeting at Trump Tower, which did take place ..... even though both Trump and Trump Jr. lied about it's purpose and who was in attendance.

In general, I believe that story was in the circulation of the main stream media from the time the WikiLeaks releases began in August of 2016, until about six months after Mueller's findings were reported, which was in March of 2019 .... So, to answer your question : the 2016 Trump Campaign / Russian collusion story was a steady part of the news cycle from approximately August of 2016 until September of 2019 - the rough equivalent of 3 years and a month.

"The 2020 Presidential Election was rigged" nonsense has now been ongoing for a solid 3 years and 2 months - beginning from the time Biden was declared the winner in mid-November of 2020 and running through the present day - with no sign of slowing down at all.

Bro, you were all in on the TrumPutin stuff. I just dug out some of your gems from the archives about two weeks ago. And there is plenty more where that came from because you were a prolific TrumPutin hoaxer.

The whataboutism is important. You peacock around in this thread telling people how ridiculous and dumb they are, yet you did the same thing. Get some self awareness

 

[GordonC]

Bro, you were all in on the TrumPutin stuff. I just dug out some of your gems from the archives about two weeks ago. And there is plenty more where that came from because you were a prolific TrumPutin hoaxer.

The whataboutism is important. You peacock around in this thread telling people how ridiculous and dumb they are, yet you did the same thing. Get some self awareness

ding ding winner