jmacvols1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2010
- Messages
- 6,043
- Likes
- 21,167
without audits it cannot be proven
You have mentioned where Trump lost suburban voters...I agree...what are your thoughts on the numerous statistical and historical anomalies that happened?Pretty much every state does some combination of a post-election audit, procedural, or a risk-limiting audit based on a statistically relevant number of precincts/polling devices...
Only 7 states (ME, MS, NH, NE, SC, SD, AL) do not have Statutory guidance for a post-election audit. AL and ME have pilots in place. NE and SC have administrative guidance but no Statutory support. MS, SD, and NH are the only ones silent.
Other than 1 district in ME and NE, none of these 7 are battleground states. Maybe in an off year, NH might be but if NH is a battleground, the R is going to win...
You have mentioned where Trump lost suburban voters...I agree...what are your thoughts on the numerous statistical and historical anomalies that happened?
Not sure if this covers it all, but what about counties won by Trump vs Biden. That's never happened beforeI dont see a lot of statistical anomalies.
Suburban Voters - Trump struggled here nationwide. No matter the state: red, blue, or purple.
Hispanic voters - Trump actually outperformed here, especially in FL.
African American voters - The D/R percentages were the similar to 2016 but the turnout was much stronger than 2016. Some of that was Warnock being on ballot in GA and Kamala being on the ticket. And yes, the mail in voting helped here. Not from a malicious standpoint but from a "making it easier to vote for a group that underperforms at times with turnout".
Not sure if this covers it all, but what about counties won by Trump vs Biden. That's never happened before
Detecting Anomalies in the 2020 US Presidential Election Votes with Benford’s Law
This study applies Benford’s law to detect anomalies in county-level vote data for the 2020 US presidential election. Most prominent distribution violations arepapers.ssrn.com
How are these? At least he said he was sorry and I bet he does better this November.Another rock solid source
Uh oh!How are these? At least he said he was sorry and I bet he does better this November.
Sec. of state issues apology to Nevada voters over glitch that caused ballots to show up as counted
The Nevada Secretary of State released an apologetic statement Thursday in response to numerous reports from voters who saw inaccurate information on the state's website that caused confusion and concern about the voting process.news.yahoo.com
Nevada addresses erroneous vote history, promises accurate voter data within 48 hours
The Nevada Secretary of State's office has identified the "technical issues" which led to errors in online voter histories.Cisco Aguilar's office released an umynews4.com