Post Your Voter Fraud Evidence Here

#1,353
#1,353
burntorangeVOLffle said:
Correct me if I’m mistaken but aren’t you the resident Q chairman of this board? And you are telling me to get my head out of the sand? 😂😂😂
Click to expand...
AirVol said:
If I’m not mistaken, Q predicted these shenanigans from the left several months ago. @ajvol01 may be able to confirm.
Click to expand...
Yes @AirVol - this was from over 2 years ago
2479
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI No.453
Nov 11 2018 13:36:43 (EST)Drq26owWsAE-7Wy.jpg-large.jpg
WHAT IF THE BELOW COULD BE PROVEN?
1-Election + D party officials filled out many thousands of blank ballots?
2-Election + D party officials removed and destroyed 'legal' ballots?
3-Election + D party officials deliberately organized non-citizen voting?
4-Election + D party officials in [XX] locations across the US [under lock & key] stored many thousands of 'blank' ballots for purposes of 'altering the vote total'?
Who safeguards 'blank' ballots?
Who issues 'blank' ballots?
Who controls 'blank' ballots?
How many 'blank' ballots are generated vs. total county pop?
THE CONTROL AND ISSUANCE OF BLANK BALLOTS IS KEY.
Why did the same counties [under dispute today] REFUSE to turn over voter registration information upon request to the Voter Fraud Commission?
Why was the Voter Fraud Commission disbanded and turned over to DHS?
What vested auth does DHS have compared to a commission body?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...55347f48762_story.html?utm_term=.db84f6960764
Enemy @ the Front Door.
Q
 
  • Like
Reactions: AirVol
#1,360
#1,360
ajvol01 said:
Video evidence is hard to dispute
Click to expand...

It is very easy to dispute if you know what you are watching. This video was made during the recount, not the original tabulation. If the vote count had been manipulated at this point, there would have been a discrepancy in the totals. There wasn't.

The guy in the video is checking the number of ballots that have been recounted. He uses a USB drive to transfer a report over to a computer that is equipped to read the data. This was done under the appropriate supervision.

This will never be presented as evidence of fraud in a court of law. It amounts to nothing more than a dishonest effort by partisans to fuel public distrust in the outcome.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WBO
#1,362
#1,362
BowlBrother85 said:
It is very easy to dispute if you know what you are watching. This video was made during the recount, not the original tabulation. If the vote count had been manipulated at this point, there would have been a discrepancy in the totals. There wasn't.

The guy in the video is checking the number of ballots that have been recounted. He uses a USB drive to transfer a report over to a computer that is equipped to read the data. This was done under the appropriate supervision.

This will never be presented as evidence of fraud in a court of law. It amounts to nothing more than a dishonest effort by partisans to fuel public distrust in the outcome.
Click to expand...
Nothing to see here. Move on.
 
#1,364
#1,364
burntorangeVOLffle said:
Yeah this guy is way more trust worthy. He has no agenda. 😂😂😂😂



When no explanation is good enough you are kinda showing your hand.
Click to expand...

People will believe what they want to believe. The tell tale sign of the validity of this "evidence" as proof of fraud is very simple though... if it is indeed proof of fraud, then it will be presented in court. If not? Then it is being misrepresented.
 
#1,372
#1,372
BowlBrother85 said:
It is very easy to dispute if you know what you are watching. This video was made during the recount, not the original tabulation. If the vote count had been manipulated at this point, there would have been a discrepancy in the totals. There wasn't.

The guy in the video is checking the number of ballots that have been recounted. He uses a USB drive to transfer a report over to a computer that is equipped to read the data. This was done under the appropriate supervision.

This will never be presented as evidence of fraud in a court of law. It amounts to nothing more than a dishonest effort by partisans to fuel public distrust in the outcome.
Click to expand...
It might help if you actually watched the video yourself and made up your own mind about what you saw.

You copy / pasted the wrong explanation.

The explanation you gave goes with this video.

 
#1,374
#1,374
tim said:
Absolutely looks routine doesn’t it?
Click to expand...
I'm not qualified to interpret the routine from the abnormal when it comes to the process of counting/recounting ballots during an election. Sterling appears to have the credentials for such judgment, however... and just like Raffensberger, he is a Republican.

Once again, if there is any validity to this at all, then it will be presented as evidence of fraud in a court of law. As of right now, it appears to be just one more item being misrepresented in the court of public opinion. Let's see if Team Kraken is confident enough in this video to bring it before a judge.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top