I haven't lost anything in court regarding this election, and I don't suppose anyone else here has either. However, if allegations of wrongdoing (either intentional or by poorly designed processes) aren't investigated, then we have all lost something - the right to credible elections. After listening to some of the testimony in the GA Senate meeting, I'm even more amazed at how allegations have been ignored. If you've ever read my comments about Giuliani, you'd note I have no use for him in any capacity - should have been put out to pasture years ago.
To say that people working in the election process and the witnesses (who basically couldn't witness much this go around) are conmen or self promoters since they prepared many of the allegations is problematic. You are either accusing those people of bias, or you are accusing the people overseeing elections of poor judgement in selecting them. Neither is good.
The mail in ballot security was poor - criminally poor. There's no real verification that the person supposedly casting a vote actually received the ballot, made the selections, or sent the ballot back. The in person voting system used in GA where the voter uses a touch screen and the system prints out a receipt to be scanned is absurd - at best a gimmick to sell equipment. I do believe the first comments about faulty equipment and the inability to repeat results - doesn't say much when we use the old adage "every vote counts" and they couldn't get tallies anywhere near one vote. Nothing about any of that passes the smell test. It's just that simple.