Post Your Voter Fraud Evidence Here

So in your first paragraph you ask if I am dumb enough to think you're trying to make it harder to vote and in the second you espouse that people should put forth enough "effort" to satisfy you. The irony is rich.


I am betting your wife or mom is named Karen, you ignorant dolt.

This is the logic of a chimp.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne
An even better example of rich irony is somebody who voted for Biden calling any other human an ignorant dolt....Hopefully that at least made you feel better. I can't wait to call my wife a Karen tonight. It should be quite comical to say the least
Trust me it’s not comical, wasn’t my wife (or her before she was my wife) but it was NOT comical
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne
Coming from someone universally thought of as the dumbest poster on this board I have a hard time getting too worked up.

If we took a straw pool I'm sure you'd see more pushback on your moronic posts. You make illiterate arguments then get mad when someone disagrees like a 2 y/o.
 
If we took a straw pool I'm sure you'd see more pushback on your moronic posts. You make illiterate arguments then get mad when someone disagrees like a 2 y/o.

You made no argument. And I have no idea what a "straw pool" is.

Likewise, I don't understand "illiterate arguments." Illogical, nonsensical, unreasoned, unfounded, groundless arguments... those I get. So, before you come at me, you illiterate baboon, form a coherent sentence.
 
Last edited:
You made no argument. And I have no idea what a "straw pool" is.

Likewise, I don't understand "illiterate arguments." Illogical, nonsensical, unreasoned, unfounded, groundless arguments... those I get. So, before you come at me, you illiterate baboon, form a coherent sentence.

 
You made no argument. And I have no idea what a "straw pool" is.

Likewise, I don't understand "illiterate arguments." Illogical, nonsensical, unreasoned, unfounded, groundless arguments... those I get. So, before you come at me, you illiterate baboon, form a coherent sentence.

Good one. I should proof read next time. I work for a living so I replied quickly this morning.

Thanks Junior.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DC_Vol
Sasquatch, after voting and drinking a pint of whiskey received from local Democrat Party.
R.b6ea0342a5a01f694b64d9aa3ed0ece0
 
Thats not proof....we can't tell if those ballot are for family!!!..(blue font) BB, EL, and other. Prob...lol
You are right. It's not proof of anything illicit.

Look at the source. It's from The Gateway Pundit. If you are taking their word for anything, then you are more gullible, than an adult should be.
 
That reports from mainstream media publications such as "The New York Times" and "The Washington Post" are summarily dismissed for having a bias, while a report from a site such as "The Gateway Pundit" is treated as gospel, is a telling indicator of the extreme cognitive dissonance on display from the right.

https://newsfactsnetwork.com/2021/06/06/media-bias-fact-check-downgrades-the-gateway-pundit/

You will not find a less reputable or more discredited news source anywhere on the internet.
 
Last edited:
^^^^ "The Gateway Pundit" ^^^^ is the source. Nuff said.

You are so predictable.....did you even watch the video?? That was definitely the same car and the same person delivering ballots 4 times in one night. There is no denying that. How can you even attempt to defend this? I did notice that she changed her pants once but apparently it was cool enough that she kept wearing the same blue sweater every time.
 
That reports from mainstream media publications such as "The New York Times" and "The Washington Post" are summarily dismissed for having a bias, while a report from a site such as "The Gateway Pundit" is treated as gospel, is a telling indicator of the extreme cognitive dissonance on display from the right.

https://newsfactsnetwork.com/2021/06/06/media-bias-fact-check-downgrades-the-gateway-pundit/

You will not find a less reputable or more discredited news source anywhere on the internet.


The simple fact that you still believe that fact checkers are unbiased tells us all we need to know about you.
 
The simple fact that you still believe that fact checkers are unbiased tells us all we need to know about you.
Some of them are.

It is just as unfair to portray all fact-checking sites as having their own political agenda, as it is to paint all newspapers with the same broad brush.

For example : FactCheck.org is a non-profit site which does not seek or accept funds from unions, partisan organizations or advocacy groups. The Rand Corporation describes their site as one which "aims to fight disinformation by identifying, exploring and correcting false information, giving people a resource for locating fact-based information."

Trying to portray all fact-checking organizations as being one and the same, is lazy and inaccurate. Also, you should be able to see the transparent agenda of The Gateway Pundit for yourself .... unless you are a stupid person.
 
Some of them are.

It is just as unfair to portray all fact-checking sites as having their own political agenda, as it is to paint all newspapers with the same broad brush.

For example : FactCheck.org is a non-profit site which does not seek or accept funds from unions, partisan organizations or advocacy groups. The Rand Corporation describes their site as one which "aims to fight disinformation by identifying, exploring and correcting false information, giving people a resource for locating fact-based information."

Trying to portray all fact-checking organizations as being one and the same, is lazy and inaccurate. Also, you should be able to see the transparent agenda of The Gateway Pundit for yourself .... unless you are a stupid person.

You obviously didn't watch the video
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol

VN Store



Back
Top