Post Your Voter Fraud Evidence Here

#1,978
#1,978
BowlBrother85 said:
No, you have totally misrepresented both what they were claiming and what has been proven. That fact-check provides much more context than what you have described. The Hillary Clinton campaign was critical of Trump for asking Russia to "find" her e-mails ... which Trump actually did! That wasn't a false accusation! Trump is on video doing it, at one of his rallies. The Clinton campaign also alleged that Russia was trying to help the Trump campaign and they were!. The June 9, 2016 meeting at Trump Tower between Russian agents and members of the Trump campaign did occur. E-mails between Trump Jr and Rob Goldstone prove this.

Not everything involving Russia and the 2016 Trump campaign was a "hoax".
Click to expand...
Dude. The Clinton campaign absolutely orchestrated a hoax. Trying to pick out 2 little parts of it that were true to try and make it as if there was no wrongdoing is ridiculous. The most talented liars mix some truth in with the lies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SlingBlayde, Mr_Henley, DC_Vol and 2 others
#1,979
#1,979
hUTch2002 said:
Dude. The Clinton campaign absolutely orchestrated a hoax. Trying to pick out 2 little parts of it that were true to try and make it as if there was no wrongdoing is ridiculous. The most talented liars mix some truth in with the lies.
Click to expand...
Two little parts? LOL.

If that June 9, 2016 meeting at Trump Tower wasn't a big deal, then why did both Donald Trump and Trump Jr. lie about it? They lied about who was there and what was discussed. Trump Jr said it was only to discuss the Magnitsky Act and the potential resumption of American adoptions of Russian children. The e-mails between Rob Goldstone and Trump Jr clearly reveal that narrative to have been an outright lie. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss Russian dirt on Hillary Clinton.

The most talented liars? That applies just as much to the Trumps as it does anyone else.
 
#1,980
#1,980
BowlBrother85 said:
Two little parts? LOL.

If that June 9, 2016 meeting at Trump Tower wasn't a big deal, then why did both Donald Trump and Trump Jr. lie about it? They lied about who was there and what was discussed. Trump Jr said it was only to discuss the Magnitsky Act and the potential resumption of American adoptions of Russian children. The e-mails between Rob Goldstone and Trump Jr clearly reveal that narrative to have been an outright lie. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss Russian dirt on Hillary Clinton.

The most talented liars? That applies just as much to the Trumps as it does anyone else.
Click to expand...
So now assumptions are ok? It’s hilarious how you are quick to make leaps of logic when it comes to accusing Trump of something but you never do that against Dems.
 
#1,984
#1,984
An old Sasquatch caught lurking near post office with mail-in ballot provided by low down Democrats. That is just wrong.
RS15324_152533219-scr.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
#1,988
#1,988
hUTch2002 said:
@BowlBrother85
Since you didn’t reply to this one I’m assuming you figured out your error.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure what your point is, but I'm not the only one here who laughs at the post-election whining that has been going on for over a year now. It's not just enough for Republicans to be losers ... they have to be pathetic losers in the process.
 
#1,989
#1,989
BowlBrother85 said:
I'm not sure what your point is, but I'm not the only one here who laughs at the post-election whining that has been going on for over a year now. It's not just enough for Republicans to be losers ... they have to be pathetic losers in the process.
Click to expand...
Good try BB. You aren’t laughing one bit. It really bothers you and you’re obsessed with trying to “correct” what others like VW are saying. I’m sure others will post from time to time like Sep did but you are the only one who feels the necessity to constantly respond to posts about election fraud and Trump, in particular. But hey, it’s your time to do as you choose. Just know that there isn’t a “we” when it comes to regularly responding to posts by VW and others. It’s always you and you aren’t changing anyone’s mind. The people that believe fraud occurred will continue to believe it and those that don’t believe it happened will continue on the same path as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT and VolinWayne
#1,990
#1,990
hUTch2002 said:
Good try BB. You aren’t laughing one bit. It really bothers you and you’re obsessed with trying to “correct” what others like VW are saying. I’m sure others will post from time to time like Sep did but you are the only one who feels the necessity to constantly respond to posts about election fraud and Trump, in particular. But hey, it’s your time to do as you choose. Just know that there isn’t a “we” when it comes to regularly responding to posts by VW and others. It’s always you and you aren’t changing anyone’s mind. The people that believe fraud occurred will continue to believe it and those that don’t believe it happened will continue on the same path as well.
Click to expand...
So why are you only replying to me? LOL. Just ignore my posts, if you don't like what I have to say.
 
#1,992
#1,992
This Opinion Just In: 2,000 Mules Offers Vivid Proof of Vote Fraud - The American Spectator | USA News and PoliticsThe American Spectator | USA News and Politics

I Ask Dinesh Your Questions About “2000 Mules” ft. Dinesh D’Souza | The Liz Wheeler Show

Following a close examination of the claims in Dinesh D’Souza’s new film, “2000 Mules” in Episode 145 (watch here: Examining 2000 Mules | Ep. 145), Liz invites Dinesh himself on the channel to ask him everything you asked about the film. In this interview based on a deep analysis of the film and questions from The Liz Wheeler Show Community on Locals (join here to ask your questions in the future:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: norrislakevol
#1,994
#1,994
Michigan governor candidates face elimination after alleged signature fraud | The Hill

This is hillarious. Dem election board outlining how cheating is done (even using the correct industry parlance) because it's Republicans (gathering signatures) but it is EXACTLY how it is done by Dems with mail-in ballots as well.


Candidates must submit 15,000 valid signatures to qualify for the ballot.

The Bureau said that the five candidates had filed forms that showed telltale signs of fraud, including forms that featured the same handwriting across multiple signatures and some that did not show signs of wear and tear typical of a used petition.

Both the Michigan Democratic Party and Tudor Dixon (R), a conservative activist also running for governor, had filed complaints challenging the signatures.

In their own review, “staff noticed a large number of petition sheets, submitted by certain circulators, appeared fraudulent and consisted entirely of invalid signatures,” the Bureau said in its report. They said some petitions showed signs of “round-tabling,” a practice in which petition gatherers sign each other’s forms in succession to vary handwriting and make signatures appear authentic.

The Bureau said they did not have reason to believe the campaigns were aware of the fraudulent signatures turned in by paid signature gatherers.

Now the reality is that in urban areas at least, GOP cheats to get on the ballot and Dems cheat with mail in ballots and with voter reg. Sometimes Dems cheat at the ballot as well with a bus of voters going to each pollsite but that is less common.

For ballot signature ops, Dems usually can just stand outside subways or bus stops and stores to gather sigs. Anyone who passes by can sign. Now this captures a lot of worthless sigs because they are not registered, not in the right district, etc but it doesnt matter because lets say the seat requires 5k petitions and they will submit 20k.

As someone who has challenged a lot of petitions, at the board and even in court, the rule is if the Dem doesnt have 3x the amount req, I challenge because I can throw most of them off but usually they have enough that its not worth trying. Republicans, however, the rule typically is about 30-50% above the Req. The reason is that most Republicans have to go door to door using the registration sheets that show where the voters live to get valid signatures. I can look at a sheet in seconds and tell you if it is legit UNLESS they have have a decent round table team.

Basically a good round table team uses the signature books to see what the voter sig looks like and if they do a half decent job, it is really hard to tell on first glance and unless you can get the voter to go to court, you cant throw it off.

Now this EXACT same template is used by operatives to fill out actual ballots and sign the mailer. The odd thing is that many GOP don't seem to mind a bit of fraud to get on the ballot but would not really even consider ballot fraud or cheating on the election itself. Dems on the other hand, rarely cheat in signature drives but cheat with the ballot count not uncommonly.

Mind you, Republicans dont have a real chance of winning many of these type races since the registration is 2:1 or better DEM:GOP. So their morality is probably more a practical thing since nobody would believe a GOP candidate would win in Compton for example.

Also, many of the races that the Dems cheat most fiercely at are primaries since the margins can be close and a single team of 6 or so at a table willing to do the necessary can easily flip the race. Also, often the election board officials (appointed by the local party machines) are willing to kind of look the other way as long as it is intraparty stuff and they kind of protect the status quo of each other's machine, while always looking for an opportunity to turn the knife in the other party or dissidents.

Whitmer must have some serious concern if they are letting operatives actually tell reporters something useful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NurseGoodVol and norrislakevol
#1,995
#1,995
#1,996
#1,996
Vol Main said:
Cholly, the car is in exactly the same place and position, in both pictures. Look at the space between the car door and the box. Exactly the same. The two women are wearing exactly the same clothes and accessories in both pictures. Anybody can change the date shown. It certainly looks like this so-called evidence of voter fraud is a fraud.
Click to expand...


The picture was part of the video that they showed. If you watch the video it's pretty obvious that it was the same lady 4 different times. She appeared to have different pants in one of the videos but always had the same blue sweater.
 
#1,997
#1,997
Vol Main said:
Cholly, the car is in exactly the same place and position, in both pictures. Look at the space between the car door and the box. Exactly the same. The two women are wearing exactly the same clothes and accessories in both pictures. Anybody can change the date shown. It certainly looks like this so-called evidence of voter fraud is a fraud.
Click to expand...

No it isn't Magoo.

First video: She has a driver
Second video; No leaves on ground, she enters her vehicle from the back
Third video: Leaves on ground
Fourth video: Enters vehicle from front
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT, VolinWayne, norrislakevol and 1 other person
#1,998
#1,998
Orangeburst said:
No it isn't Magoo.

First video: She has a driver
Second video; No leaves on ground, she enters her vehicle from the back
Third video: Leaves on ground
Fourth video: Enters vehicle from front
Click to expand...
Plus the shadows change every time. Lame even for that lo iq poser but at least she did not try and charge for the "re(tard)search".
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85, norrislakevol and Orangeburst
#1,999
#1,999
To me, proof for 2020 election fraud is simple. In 2016, the Dems cried foul when they lost along with the media (Russia, Russia, Russia). In 2020, when they won, they all said it was the most secure election ever and censored anyone that questioned the results. The main variable between the two elections was mail-in voting which opens the door for more fraud. So why was 2016 fraudulent and 2020 secure? Illogical.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider, VolinWayne and Orangeburst
#2,000
#2,000
StarRaider said:
Plus the shadows change every time. Lame even for that lo iq poser but at least she did not try and charge for the "re(tard)search".
Click to expand...

I am not even convinced the first that gets out of the car on the passenger side is the same person as the others. That might be her driving though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top