Post Your Voter Fraud Evidence Here

#2,051
#2,051
SlingBlayde said:
1) Fact checkers don’t have an agenda.
2) Fact checkers never lie.
3) The government is the most honest institution on earth.
4) CNN, MSNBC, etc are 100% truthful at all times.
5) All politicians are ethical.
6) The CDC and WHO want what’s best for me.
7) All elections are 99.9999% percent fraud free.
I have $1M in gold bars I’d like to sell you for $200k. I’m sure you’d be interested.
Click to expand...
1 & 2) Those aren't exclusively fact-checkers. Once again, the sources that I have used include Newsweek, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Reuters, The Associated Press and The New York Times.

3) I didn't say anything like that, and it has NOTHING to do with this anyway.

4) I haven't linked any of those sources during this discussion. I did link an interview on Fox News. conducted by Sandra Smith of Republican Rep. Mo Brooks, in the Newsweek article. She would not let him cite the "2,000 Mules" documentary as proof of fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election. To her credit, she correctly states that the allegations made by Republican commentator, Dinesh D'Souza have all been completely de-bunked by reputable sources.

5) I didn't say that either.

6) That has nothing to do with this particular discussion.

7) There is no proof of widespread fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election, and you wouldn't be arguing the matter, if Donald Trump had won.
 
#2,052
#2,052
BowlBrother85 said:
1 & 2) Those aren't exclusively fact-checkers. Once again, the sources that I have used include Newsweek, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Reuters, The Associated Press and The New York Times.

3) I didn't say anything like that, and it has NOTHING to do with this anyway.

4) I haven't linked any of those sources during this discussion. I did link an interview on Fox News. conducted by Sandra Smith of Republican Rep. Mo Brooks, in the Newsweek article. She would not let him cite the "2,000 Mules" documentary as proof of fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election. To her credit, she correctly states that the allegations made by Republican commentator, Dinesh D'Souza have all been completely de-bunked by reputable sources.

5) I didn't say that either.

6) That has nothing to do with this particular discussion.

7) There is no proof of widespread fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election, and you wouldn't be arguing the matter, if Donald Trump had won.
Click to expand...
I was just illustrating the naïvety of your belief system.
You are incorrect on #7. Based on what I’ve seen, I would agree with anyone that would dispute a Trump win if the roles were reversed.
 
#2,053
#2,053
SlingBlayde said:
I was just illustrating the naïvety of your belief system.
You are incorrect on #7. Based on what I’ve seen, I would agree with anyone that would dispute a Trump win if the roles were reversed.
Click to expand...
But I have never said most of those things ...

1 & 2) All I have said about fact checkers, is that they are not all the same, just as main stream media news outlets are not all the same either. People such as yourself, want to portray all fact-checkers as being biased and unprofessional, and that broad brush is unfair and inaccurate.

3) That doesn't reflect my belief system at all, and never has.

4) I don't watch CNN. I do watch MSNBC occasionally, and sure, they have lied.

5) LOL! Another thing that I have never said in my life. You are either making things up, or you have mistaken me for someone else.

6) I'm pretty sure that I've never said that either. Although, I'm less suspicious of them than you probably are.

7) I've never said that either. I will only assert that systemic voter fraud in the United States, has not been proven in the 2020 Presidential Election.
 
#2,054
#2,054
BowlBrother85 said:
But I have never said most of those things ...

1 & 2) All I have said about fact checkers, is that they are not all the same, just as main stream media news outlets are not all the same either. People such as yourself, want to portray all fact-checkers as being biased and unprofessional, and that broad brush is unfair and inaccurate.

3) That doesn't reflect my belief system at all, and never has.

4) I don't watch CNN. I do watch MSNBC occasionally, and sure, they have lied.

5) LOL! Another thing that I have never said in my life. You are either making things up, or you have mistaken me for someone else.

6) I'm pretty sure that I've never said that either. Although, I'm less suspicious of them than you probably are.

7) I've never said that either. I will only assert that systemic voter fraud in the United States, has not been proven in the 2020 Presidential Election.
Click to expand...
Ok.
 
#2,056
#2,056
#2,057
#2,057
Did not even read the article

A letter from County Recorder Stephen Richer, responding to Verity Vote’s document request, indicated that the Nov. 4 receipt the county provided is not the only receipt for ballots the county received that day.
 
#2,058
#2,058
BowlBrother85 said:
The only sources currently running with this ^^^, are the far-right fringe sites, such as John Solomon's "Just the News". Like every other claim of this nature, it will be fact-checked and summarily de-bunked within the next 24 hours. I will post some follow-ups when that happens ... and we all know that it will. This nonsense never sticks.
Click to expand...
I wouldn’t expect anything different from the unbiased fact checkers.
Edit: the media has been saying for over a year now that 2020 was legitimate. To admit they were wrong now just isn’t going to happen no matter what evidence is produced.
 
Last edited:
#2,059
#2,059
VolinWayne said:
Whats not legitimate about the security footage? It is the actual security footage of the drop boxes. The ping data that they purchased is as real as it gets. It's also extremely accurate.( Fact checkers are straight up lying when they say it's not accurate)

Goodnight, I'm done arguing with you
Click to expand...
I promised 6 more links to new sources. Here they are, and none of them are exclusively for the purpose of fact-checking.

Dinesh D’Souza’s ‘2000 Mules’ Is a Hilarious Mockumentary

^ THE BULWARK ^

Fact Checking Dinesh D’Souza’s ‘2,000 Mules’

^ THE DISPATCH ^

FACT CHECK: Fact Checking Dinesh D’Souza’s ‘2,000 Mules’

^ ALL SIDES ^

There Is More Than One Big Lie

^ FIVE THIRTY EIGHT ^

Data Brokers and True the Vote are the Real Villains of "2000 Mules" Movie

^ ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION ^

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...s-least-convincing-election-fraud-theory-yet/

^ THE WASHINGTON POST ^
 
Last edited:
#2,060
#2,060
SlingBlayde said:
I wouldn’t expect anything different from the unbiased fact checkers.
Edit: the media has been saying for over a year now that 2020 was legitimate. To admit they were wrong now just isn’t going to happen no matter what evidence is produced.
Click to expand...
In all honesty, this "2000 Mules" documentary from Dinesh D'Souza is easier to de-bunk than pretty much anything that the crackpot Sidney Powell was saying. There are literally hundreds of known sources that have taken a whack at this. The only challenge is picking which ones to link here. I will post more shortly.
 
Last edited:
#2,061
#2,061
VolinWayne said:
You are pathetic.....the videos and the data they have presented is absolutely undeniable. It's people like you that are destroying America. The person you voted for couldn barely get 15 people to come to a rally. There has never been a President who has been as anti-American as Joe Biden. Nearly every policy he has put into place has put America last and been another step to destroy our country.
Click to expand...
Here are 2 more links to new sources; neither of which are to sites that exclusively fact check. They discuss the Dinesh D'Souza documentary known as "2,000 Mules."

Trump rails against Fox News, saying the network hasn't aired a movie alleging widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election

^ BUSINESS INSIDER ^

Former President Donald Trump is venting anger that Fox News won't discuss the D'Souza documentary, but is there any doubt that they would, if they had been able to independently verify any of the claims which were made in "2,000 Mules?" I'm sorry, but Fox News is not biased against Donald Trump. To imply otherwise is just stupid.

FACT FOCUS: Difference In Claim Of 2 Thousand Ballot 'mules'

^ NATION WORLD NEWS ^
 
#2,063
#2,063
VolinWayne said:
View attachment 460462
Click to expand...
In your effort to make this an issue of left vs right, you are ignoring the fact that right-wing cable news won't touch the "2,000 Mules" documentary with a 10 foot pole. Why do you suppose that is? Do you honestly believe that those two networks, Fox News and Newsmax, would have banned mention of this documentary, if there was any validity to its allegations at all?

Here are 3 more links which address Donald Trump's anger at Fox News and Newsmax for not discussing "2,000 Mules" on the air.

Even Newsmax Refuses To Cover Dinesh D’Souza’s 2000 Mules Movie

^ POLITICUS USA ^

Newsmax is even further to the right than Fox News is, but they won't mention "2,000 Mules", or its allegations either.

D'Souza targets Fox News, says network banning mention of '2000 Mules'

^ NEWSWEEK ^

Donald Trump Slams Fox News: CNN Should Go Conservative

^ THE WRAP ^

This is funny. Donald Trump is so mad at Fox News for not discussing the "2,000 Mules" documentary, that he is now advising CNN to go conservative, and fight for their audience. I'm sure they will get right on that, Donald! LOL.
 
Last edited:
#2,064
#2,064
BowlBrother85 said:
In your effort to make this an issue of left vs right, you are ignoring the fact that right-wing cable news won't touch the "2,000 Mules" documentary with a 10 foot pole. Why do you suppose that is? Do you honestly believe that those two networks, Fox News and Newsmax, would have banned mention of this documentary, if there was any validity to its allegations at all?

Here are 3 more links which address Donald Trump's anger at Fox News and Newsmax for not discussing "2,000 Mules" on the air.

Even Newsmax Refuses To Cover Dinesh D’Souza’s 2000 Mules Movie

^ POLITICUS USA ^

Newsmax is even further to the right than Fox News is, but they won't mention "2,000 Mules", or its allegations either.

D'Souza targets Fox News, says network banning mention of '2000 Mules'

^ NEWSWEEK ^

Donald Trump Slams Fox News: CNN Should Go Conservative

^ THE WRAP ^

This is funny. Donald Trump is so mad at Fox News for not discussing the "2,000 Mules" documentary, that he is now advising CNN to go conservative, and fight for their audience. I'm sure they will get right on that, Donald! LOL.
Click to expand...
I’m curious, if you knew back in 2020 what you know now, would you still vote for Biden?
 
#2,065
#2,065
SlingBlayde said:
I’m curious, if you knew back in 2020 what you know now, would you still vote for Biden?
Click to expand...
If his opponent is still Donald Trump? Hell, yeah.

Hard core Republicans will never understand that the 81 million of us (and that number is cited a lot on here) didn't think of it as a vote for Biden, as much as it was a vote against Trump. I could have voted for John Kasich or Marco Rubio.

... and if faced with another choice between Biden and Trump in 2024? I would do it again.
 
#2,067
#2,067
BowlBrother85 said:
If his opponent is still Donald Trump? Hell, yeah.

Hard core Republicans will never understand that the 81 million of us (and that number is cited a lot on here) didn't think of it as a vote for Biden, as much as it was a vote against Trump. I could have voted for John Kasich or Marco Rubio.

... and if faced with another choice between Biden and Trump in 2024? I would do it again.
Click to expand...
Well, I vote policy over personality (can’t stand Trump personally). Also anyone that puts America first would get my vote even if I despised them. This goes to show how intellectually shallow the voting population has become. It’s not about a single person. It’s about an administration and direction for the country. Clearly the country is headed down the crapper and people are so blinded by hate they wouldn’t change it if they could.
 
#2,068
#2,068
SlingBlayde said:
Well, I vote policy over personality (can’t stand Trump personally). Also anyone that puts America first would get my vote even if I despised them. This goes to show how intellectually shallow the voting population has become. It’s not about a single person. It’s about an administration and direction for the country. Clearly the country is headed down the crapper and people are so blinded by hate they wouldn’t change it if they could.
Click to expand...

BB is voting for whoever is on the D ticket regardless of the opponent on the R one.
 
#2,069
#2,069
SlingBlayde said:
Well, I vote policy over personality (can’t stand Trump personally). Also anyone that puts America first would get my vote even if I despised them. This goes to show how intellectually shallow the voting population has become. It’s not about a single person. It’s about an administration and direction for the country. Clearly the country is headed down the crapper and people are so blinded by hate they wouldn’t change it if they could.
Click to expand...
So you're in favor of massive debt and ineffectual leadership? Interesting stance
 
#2,070
#2,070
OrangeTsar said:
Don’t know if it is evidence of voter fraud or voter stupidity, but HOW IN THE WORLD ARE THERE 36% OF VOTERS WHO STILL SAY THEY SUPPORT THIS CLOWN? 😳
Click to expand...
I guess this means there’s 51,840,000 people with voter’s remorse LOL (assuming they only polled the original (supposed) 81M.)
 
#2,071
#2,071
utvolpj said:
So you're in favor of massive debt and ineffectual leadership? Interesting stance
Click to expand...
As opposed to hyper inflation, potential nuclear war, open borders, potential food shortages, woke military and giving tax payer money and billions in military equipment to foreign countries?
Ineffectual leadership LOL? I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but we are the laughingstock of the world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne
#2,072
#2,072
SlingBlayde said:
Well, I vote policy over personality (can’t stand Trump personally). Also anyone that puts America first would get my vote even if I despised them. This goes to show how intellectually shallow the voting population has become. It’s not about a single person. It’s about an administration and direction for the country. Clearly the country is headed down the crapper and people are so blinded by hate they wouldn’t change it if they could.
Click to expand...
Since the President is responsible for assembling his cabinet ... In 2020, it was about a single person. It wasn't just about personality either. Donald Trump was corrupt. Trump abused the powers of his office for self-enrichment purposes, and he stocked his cabinet with people who did the same (Scott Pruitt, Tom Price, Ryan Zinke, David Shulkin, Elaine Chao, Steve Mnuchin and Wilbur Ross). Trump aggressively attempted to use those same powers to overturn the outcome of his own failed re-election bid. Trump was also not above using the powers of his office to wage vendettas against those who opposed him. Finally, Trump's use of nepotism was extreme. Jared Kushner had no business being in the West Wing, and yet it seemed like he could have any responsibility he wanted. It was ridiculous.
 
#2,073
#2,073
SlingBlayde said:
As opposed to hyper inflation, potential nuclear war, open borders, potential food shortages, woke military and giving tax payer money and billions in military equipment to foreign countries?
Click to expand...
Inflation was already coming when you voted. There rest were not factors. You also had an option to support someone besides Trump but didn't. He was printing money and giving it to friends before the election
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top