Post Your Voter Fraud Evidence Here

One thing I've noticed over time from the Republicans / Conservatives / Trump supporters on here ...

Whenever misinformation that serves a Republican Party narrative is brought to light, you don't get mad at the conservative who posted the misinformation. Instead, you get mad at the liberal who identified the misinformation for what it was, and corrected the record.

This page, with the "DOMINION IS BUSTED!" source link, is a good example of what I'm talking about.


This particular case had nothing to do with a candidate being Republican or Democrat. Mrs Long Spears, the lady who got cheated was actually a Democrat. Personally I dont care if its an R or a D beside the name, I will always push for election integrity. I know your brain can't comprehend this but this has nothing to do with Donald Trump. This case proves what so many people (Republicans and Democrats) have been saying for years that Voting machines can be manipulated by bad actors.

I will even flip the script here and add that Brian Kemp had the Dominion machines installed here in GA back when he was our Secretary of State. Perhaps he cheated (yes I voted for him in 2018 but not this year) when he defeated Stacy Abrams.
 
Last edited:
And then there is this. Voting machines are vulnerable. All it takes is a few bad actors. What many have been saying for 2 years now (some people have been saying this for 15 years)

CISA issues detailed advisory on vulnerabilities affecting certain versions of Dominion Voting Systems’ software.


Vulnerabilities Affecting Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast X | CISA

. SUMMARY
This advisory identifies vulnerabilities affecting versions of the Dominion Voting Systems Democracy Suite ImageCast X, which is an in-person voting system used to allow voters to mark their ballot. The ImageCast X can be configured to allow a voter to produce a paper record or to record votes electronically. While these vulnerabilities present risks that should be mitigated as soon as possible, CISA has no evidence that these vulnerabilities have been exploited in any elections.

Exploitation of these vulnerabilities would require physical access to individual ImageCast X devices, access to the Election Management System (EMS), or the ability to modify files before they are uploaded to ImageCast X devices. Jurisdictions can prevent and/or detect the exploitation of these vulnerabilities by diligently applying the mitigations recommended in this advisory, including technical, physical, and operational controls that limit unauthorized access or manipulation of voting systems. Many of these mitigations are already typically standard practice in jurisdictions where these devices are in use and can be enhanced to further guard against exploitation of these vulnerabilities.
 
2.2.1 IMPROPER VERIFICATION OF CRYPTOGRAPHIC SIGNATURE CWE-347
The tested version of ImageCast X does not validate application signatures to a trusted root certificate. Use of a trusted root certificate ensures software installed on a device is traceable to, or verifiable against, a cryptographic key provided by the manufacturer to detect tampering. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to install malicious code, which could also be spread to other vulnerable ImageCast X devices via removable media.

2.2.2 MUTABLE ATTESTATION OR MEASUREMENT REPORTING DATA CWE-1283
The tested version of ImageCast X’s on-screen application hash display feature, audit log export, and application export functionality rely on self-attestation mechanisms. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to disguise malicious applications on a device.

CVE-2022-1740 has been assigned to this vulnerability.

2.2.3 HIDDEN FUNCTIONALITY CWE-912
The tested version of ImageCast X has a Terminal Emulator application which could be leveraged by an attacker to gain elevated privileges on a device and/or install malicious code.

CVE-2022-1741 has been assigned to this vulnerability.

2.2.4 IMPROPER PROTECTION OF ALTERNATE PATH CWE-424
The tested version of ImageCast X allows for rebooting into Android Safe Mode, which allows an attacker to directly access the operating system. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to escalate privileges on a device and/or install malicious code.

CVE-2022-1742 has been assigned to this vulnerability.

2.2.5 PATH TRAVERSAL: '../FILEDIR' CWE-24
The tested version of ImageCast X can be manipulated to cause arbitrary code execution by specially crafted election definition files. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to spread malicious code to ImageCast X devices from the EMS.

CVE-2022-1743 has been assigned to this vulnerability.

2.2.6 EXECUTION WITH UNNECESSARY PRIVILEGES CWE-250
Applications on the tested version of ImageCast X can execute code with elevated privileges by exploiting a system level service. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to escalate privileges on a device and/or install malicious code.

CVE-2022-1744 has been assigned to this vulnerability.

2.2.7 AUTHENTICATION BYPASS BY SPOOFING CWE-290
The authentication mechanism used by technicians on the tested version of ImageCast X is susceptible to forgery. An attacker with physical access may use this to gain administrative privileges on a device and install malicious code or perform arbitrary administrative actions.

CVE-2022-1745 has been assigned to this vulnerability.

2.2.8 INCORRECT PRIVILEGE ASSIGNMENT CWE-266
The authentication mechanism used by poll workers to administer voting using the tested version of ImageCast X can expose cryptographic secrets used to protect election information. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to gain access to sensitive information and perform privileged actions, potentially affecting other election equipment.

CVE-2022-1746 has been assigned to this vulnerability.

2.2.9 ORIGIN VALIDATION ERROR CWE-346
The authentication mechanism used by voters to activate a voting session on the tested version of ImageCast X is susceptible to forgery. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to print an arbitrary number of ballots without authorization.

CVE-2022-1747 has been assigned to this vulnerability.

2.3 BACKGROUND
CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE SECTORS Government Facilities / Election Infrastructure
COUNTRIES/AREAS DEPLOYED: Multiple
COMPANY HEADQUARTERS LOCATION: Denver, Colorado
2.4 RESEARCHER
J. Alex Halderman, University of Michigan, and Drew Springall, Auburn University, reported these vulnerabilities to CISA.
 
This particular case had nothing to do with a candidate being Republican or Democrat. Mrs Long Spears, the lady who got cheated was actually a Democrat. Personally I dont care if its an R or a D beside the name, I will always push for election integrity. I know your brain cant comprehwnd this but this has nothing to do with Donald Trump. This case proves what so many people (Republicans and Democrats) have been saying for years that Voting machines can be manipulated by bad actors.
The source you posted a link to, was making the case against election integrity, by dishonestly portraying the manufacturers of Dominion's voting machines, as being the root cause of this tabulation error in Georgia. Furthermore, your linked source also strongly suggested, with the all-caps "DOMINION IS BUSTED!" portion of their headline, that not only was Dominion to blame for the error, but this error had also been deliberately crafted with malicious forethought.

None of that is accurate.

The fault for the tabulation error rests entirely with the office of Georgia's Secretary of State, by their own admission, for mistakes made in programming the computers to account for a candidate who had dropped out of this one particular race.

That headline, would have you believe that the fault rested with Dominion, which is a desired conclusion by many right-wing media outlets, who would like to support attacks made against Dominion by the Trump campaign, following his defeat in the 2020 Presidential Election. This false assertion, "DOMINION IS BUSTED!", had a lot to do with Donald Trump, and the ongoing desire from the right-wing, to prove that his baseless accusations concerning Dominion had been correct.

This case does not prove that there are any "bad actors" in Georgia's Secretary of State's office. It does prove that human beings will sometimes make mistakes with how they program changes into computers. It also proves that there is an effective system of checks and balances in place to catch such human errors and correct them, prior to certification.
 
Last edited:
The source you posted a link to, was making the case against election integrity, by dishonestly portraying the manufacturers of Dominion's voting machines, as being the root cause of this tabulation error in Georgia. Furthermore, your linked source also strongly suggested, with the all-caps "DOMINION IS BUSTED!" portion of their headline, that not only was Dominion to blame for the error, but this error had also been deliberately crafted with malicious forethought.

None of that is accurate.

The fault for the tabulation error rests entirely with the office of Georgia's Secretary of State, by their own admission, for mistakes made in programming the computers to account for a candidate who had dropped out of this one particular race.

That headline, would have you believe that the fault rested with Dominion, which is a desired conclusion by many right-wing media outlets, who would like to support attacks made against Dominion by the Trump campaign, following his defeat in the 2020 Presidential Election. This false assertion, "DOMINION IS BUSTED!", had a lot to do with Donald Trump, and the ongoing desire from the right-wing, to prove that his baseless accusations concerning Dominion had been correct.

This case does not prove that there are any "bad actors" in Georgia's Secretary of State's office. It does prove that human beings will sometimes make mistakes with how they program changes into computers. It also proves that there is an effective system of checks and balances in place to catch such human errors and correct them, prior to certification.
On a side note with your stance that it was the "person using the dominion machine" that is responsible and not the company and made the machine..is it safe to assume the you follow the same logic on gun manufacturers and sellers when a shooting happens??
 
I think the idea is that the opportunites to cheat are somewhat limited if there is a smaller window of time to do it in. I mean how many ballots can a mule traffic in one single day....personally I would love to see election day become a national holiday.

The opportunity for everyone to participate is also limited if there’s a smaller window.

Make Election Day a national holiday, problem solved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: norrislakevol
On a side note with your stance that it was the "person using the dominion machine" that is responsible and not the company and made the machine..is it safe to assume the you follow the same logic on gun manufacturers and sellers when a shooting happens??
I don't believe that a gun manufacturer is ever at fault when their weapons are used for illegal activity. I would say the same thing for a gun dealer, as long as they performed their due diligence prior to the sale, and didn't sell to a convicted felon or to an underage buyer.
 
The opportunity for everyone to participate is also limited if there’s a smaller window.

Make Election Day a national holiday, problem solved.
There is no reason not to have an in-person, early voting period.

If poll workers are following the same protocol as they would on the day of the election, then it shouldn't lead to an increase in voter fraud. If people really do want to get rid of "mules", that's fine. I don't have a problem with eliminating drop boxes, or even eliminating mail-in voting.... as long as in-person, early voting remains.

The only reason to get rid of an in-person, early voting period (I'm talking exclusively about voting which is done inside of a designated voting precinct, after a government-issued form of identification has been presented to authorized personnel), is to suppress voter turnout. There is no proof that in-person, early voting has ever lead to increases in voter fraud; nor is there any logical reason as to why it would.
 
There is no reason not to have an in-person, early voting period.

If poll workers are following the same protocol as they would on the day of the election, then it shouldn't lead to an increase in voter fraud. If people really do want to get rid of "mules", that's fine. I don't have a problem with eliminating drop boxes, or even eliminating mail-in voting.... as long as in-person, early voting remains.

The only reason to get rid of an in-person, early voting period (I'm talking exclusively about voting which is done inside of a designated voting precinct, after a government-issued form of identification has been presented to authorized personnel), is to suppress voter turnout. There is no proof that in-person, early voting has ever lead to increases in voter fraud; nor is there any logical reason as to why it would.

I’m okay with in-person early voting AND making Election Day a national holiday.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BowlBrother85
I don't believe that a gun manufacturer is ever at fault when their weapons are used for illegal activity. I would say the same thing for a gun dealer, as long as they performed their due diligence prior to the sale, and didn't sell to a convicted felon or to an underage buyer.
Do you think the gun is fault
 
Do you think the gun is fault
I think that there would be fewer fatalities resulting from shooting sprees, if there was a ban on assault rifles. Shooting sprees would still happen, and we would still have a lot of dead people from them. Admittedly, that's just my own conjecture, though. We don't really know if it would change anything or not. The only thing we do know, is that no such ban will ever happen in the United States. It would require bi-partisan legislation, and the Republican Party is too heavily influenced by the gun lobby, including the NRA, to take such a step. That has remained true, even though the leadership of that organization, Wayne LaPierre, has proven to be corrupt and incompetent.
 
You can have a safer absentee ballot system as well. Anyone wishing to vote absentee AKA "mail in voting" needs to register their thumbprint. That verifies that THAT particular person cast their ballot. I'm sure that some dems would cry about it being racists and claim that minorities may not be able to find their thumbs.
 
BREAKING: Hero Sheriff Sues Lawless MI AG Nessel, Dishonest MI SOS Benson For Interfering, Obstructing and Covering Up Crimes In Election Fraud Investigations, Including Machine Voting, Ballot Harvesting and Trafficking

Hero and American treasure, Barry County Sheriff Dar Leaf and the Barry County Sheriff’s Office is suing MI Attorney General Dana Nessel, MI Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, the Director of MI Bureau of Elections Jonathan Brater, the MI State Police, MI State Police Trooper Bryan Fuller and MI State Police Trooper David Geyer in their official and individual capacity.

Michigan Election Code specifically states that it is the duty of any police, sheriff or other peace officer, present and having knowledge of any violation of any of the provisions of this act to forthwith institute criminal proceedings for the punishment of such offender.”

MI Election law also states that a MI Sheriff is required to investigate any alleged or suspected illegal or fraudulent voter registration activity:

If a township or city clerk has knowledge that there is a probable illegal or fraudulent registration in the township or city, or in any ward or precinct of the township or city, the clerk has the power and duty to make a full investigation of the facts concerning the registration and to ascertain whether any name has been illegally or fraudulently registered. A township or city clerk is authorized and empowered to call upon the police department of the city or the sheriff of the county in which the city is located, or both, to assist in making the investigation, and the police department and the sheriff are required to render assistance if the clerk makes a request for assistance, and to furnish the clerk at his or her request with all available assistance in making the investigation.

Sheriff Dar Leaf’s lawsuit addresses the lawless and obstructive actions of Attorney General Dana Nessel, who regularly mocks and threatens her political opponents, together with Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, who’s blocked the efforts of citizens and law enforcement to investigate voter fraud and voter irregularities related to the 2020 election.

Benson has also been caught in numerous lies related to the election and like her fellow Democrat activist attorney general, she has mocked and threatened her political opponents while preventing Sheriff Dar to perform his duties and responsibilities as an elected official.
 
Democrats and Unaffiliated Voters Who Saw '2000 Mules' Recommend All Americans Watch the Film

The film ‘2000 Mules,’ a documentary on voter fraud in the 2020 election directed by Dinesh D’Souza, is winning over those Democrats and unaffiliated voters who actually go out and see the film.

A Rasmussen poll reveals that the film has persuaded three-quarters of both Democrats and unaffiliated voters to see the movie.

“A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 77% of those Likely U.S. voters who have seen ‘2000 Mules’ say the movie strengthened their conviction that there was systematic and widespread election fraud in the 2020 election,” the polling firm reported on Friday. “Only 19% of those who have seen the documentary say their belief in election fraud was weakened.”

“So far, only 15% of voters have seen ‘2000 Mules,’ the movie by conservative activist Dinesh D’Souza,” Rasmussen adds. “Nineteen percent (19%) of Republicans, 14% of Democrats and 11% of voters not affiliated with either major party report having watched ‘2000 Mules’.”

However, a substantial number of Americans say that they have heard of the film. The poll shows that 41% of voters have heard about ‘2000 Mules.’ That number includes 50% of Republicans, 36% of Democrats and 38% of unaffiliated voters.
 
Not a single one of you Dems should ever mention "gerrymandering" again.

There Was a Huge ‘Mistake’ in the 2020 Census… Guess Which Party It Favored?

There was a major problem with the 2020 Census, and most people probably haven’t heard about it, even though it has enormous implications. At the end of May, the Census Bureau admitted that it miscounted 14 states in the 2020 Census.

Here are the states that the Census acknowledged it overcounted: Hawaii, Delaware, Rhode Island, Minnesota, New York, and Massachusetts.

Here are the states that the Census acknowledged it undercounted: Texas, Illinois, Florida, Mississippi, Tennessee, and Arkansas.

Well, gee, isn’t that interesting. Does it seem like a mere bizarre coincidence that the overcounted states all voted for Biden in 2020, and five of the six undercounted states for Trump in 2020?


So basically the Dems have more congressional seats and most critically, more electoral college votes that they do not deserve. But its too late to do anything about it - too bad so sad, we just lied, straight up cheated in your face Republicans and not a damn thing you can do about it!
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne
But wait - THAT CANT HAPPEN. The fraud committed in that article can't actually happen per our experts here on VN. Fools act as if ballot stuffing is new. What is new is the big lie that Covid necessitated mail in voting that enabled multiple ballot stuffing schemes to be infused with steroids. ALL of them in Democrat run big city election operations.
The key is they say "wide spread fraud" which would be more then 50% but in reality they only need loke 10% to 20% fraud in order to tipnthr scale in those swing states
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne
The key is they say "wide spread fraud" which would be more then 50% but in reality they only need loke 10% to 20% fraud in order to tipnthr scale in those swing states

Far less. You really only need perhaps as few as 100k votes across 3-4 states.

Wisconsin - 10 electoral votes - 20k for Biden
Arizona - 11 electoral votes - 10k for Biden
Georgia - 16 electoral votes - 12k for Biden
Pennsylvania - 20 electoral votes - 82k for Biden

Michigan - 16 electoral votes - 155k for Biden

306 Biden, 232 Trump becomes 269 Biden, 279 Trump

Btw- there were NO races that were close that Trump won. In EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THE 5 CLOSE STATES, Biden won. 4 of those 5 were "flipped states", meaning that they had gone for Trump before.

You cant tell me that 2000 mules couldnt manufacture a mere 12k votes in Atlanta or 82 in Philly? Walk in the park.

That is 100k votes out of supposedly 165 million cast or less than 1/16 of 1% controls the whole thing.

How "widespread" does the cheating need to be?
 
103243008_3889832994443059_580144043617410015_n.jpg
 

The funny/sad thing is that Republicans think those votes for Ratsburger or Kemp came from Republicans.

And no, the scenario I am speaking of doesn’t mean a ton of Dems came out to vote for Republicans at the polls (although they can in GAs open primary). They are too ignorant to understand they are being set up for Stacy Abrams to be the lone winner this fall.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne
The funny/sad thing is that Republicans think those votes for Ratsburger or Kemp came from Republicans.

And no, the scenario I am speaking of doesn’t mean a ton of Dems came out to vote for Republicans at the polls (although they can in GAs open primary). They are too ignorant to understand they are being set up for Stacy Abrams to be the lone winner this fall.


Just curious on what you are saying here. I'd love to know your theory on exactly what happened in the GA Primary. It certainly doesn't make sense that Kemp got more Primary votes now then he did 4 years ago. The passionate conservative voters who I know here in GA wanted to see him gone. I know a lot of people who voted for Kandiss Taylor who are filling out affidavits to say who they voted for. The thought is that even if they have a small percentage of people who voted for Kandiss return affidavits the number will blow the 30k votes that she supposedly got out of the water.
 
Last edited:

VN Store



Back
Top