Praise Our Vols, But Don't Poison Them- 😊

#26
#26
fossilfiction said:
So Connor didn't come to the Tennessee vs Kentucky game and steal signals in disguise? Why did all USC players wear wristbands on defense for the Tennessee game, which they haven't done before or since? ALL OF THEM wore signal bands. Were there is smoke, there is fire.
Click to expand...
Connor had people attend numerous games of contenders to scout them in case Michigan played them. There is zero evidence Michigan gave any signals to South Carolina. In any event, it wasn't their defense that beat us, it was their offense, our offense scored 36 and would have scored more had Hooker not gotten hurt. Wearing wristbands on defense isn't illegal and seems to be a reasonable attempt at improvement considering the speed of our offense and the fact that they had given up 38 the week before. South Carolina just got better late that year, it happens. They also beat Clemson on the road and played a good Notre Dame team a tough game in the Gator Bowl right after us. We just walked into a night game hornet's nest on the road in the SEC, and Rattler got hot, fueling the upset. Happens pretty regularly in our conference.
 
#27
#27
WoodsmanVol said:
I know some hate the Saban quote, but I think he is so right about trying to prevent his team from letting massive accolades saturating players' minds. I think it's a catchy phrase in the context of CFB, so I'm hooked.
Click to expand...
Tin foil hat much ?
 
#28
#28
WoodsmanVol said:
I know some hate the Saban quote, but I think he is so right about trying to prevent his team from letting massive accolades saturating players' minds. I think it's a catchy phrase in the context of CFB, so I'm hooked.
Click to expand...
From what I have seen of these players in interviews and even in social media I don't think that's an issue. They seem to be really focused on the next game and nothing else. They seem really bought into CJH and his 'coach speak' is actually reality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chuckiepoo
#29
#29
508mikey said:
Tin foil hat much ?
Click to expand...
Still trying to bait me into a senseless off-topic tit-for-ta game, with an old political forum insult, I see. This is the football forum Mik. I no longer frequent the political forum. Get over it, kid, get it over it.
1727878867688.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: chuckiepoo
#30
#30
pimo1 said:
From what I have seen of these players in interviews and even in social media I don't think that's an issue. They seem to be really focused on the next game and nothing else. They seem really bought into CJH and his 'coach speak' is actually reality.
Click to expand...
We hope.
1727879220439.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: chuckiepoo and pimo1
#31
#31

We had guys like this just a couple of years ago. That South Carolina game was bound to happen at some point.
I truly feel Heupel has massively improved the culture of this football team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chuckiepoo
#32
#32
J C Higgins said:
One of, if not the most infamous game in Vol history....

Nov 15th, 1969

"Archie Who?" buttons had been worn by some players and students that week.

# 3 Tennessee Vols (7-0) vs #18 Ole Miss Rebels (5-3)

Final score...

Ole Miss 38
Tennessee 0
Click to expand...
My Dad along with friends rented an airplane to attend the Tennessee - Mississippi game. They proudly wore their 'Archie Who' buttons. Dad said, "That Archie Who guy beat the pants off my Vols." Never saw that button again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chuckiepoo
#35
#35
WoodsmanVol said:
Yes it is. But you're sly. Anyone who has not seen you employ this tactic is the political forum will assume it isn't political. Sneaky tactic.
Click to expand...
so why is your history hidden - scared of people looking at your posts ?
 
#37
#37
J C Higgins said:
One of, if not the most infamous game in Vol history....

Nov 15th, 1969

"Archie Who?" buttons had been worn by some players and students that week.

# 3 Tennessee Vols (7-0) vs #18 Ole Miss Rebels (5-3)

Oh how

Final score...

Ole Miss 38
Tennessee 0
Click to expand...

Oh how I remember
 
  • Like
Reactions: chuckiepoo
#38
#38
WoodsmanVol said:
There you go again trying to lure me into an off-topic exchange.
View attachment 683073
Click to expand...
well-bye-later.gif
 
#40
#40
chuckiepoo said:
…nice bait. Deep water for walleye?
Click to expand...
Got two in my tackle box, received as a gift. But, for whatever reason, never used them. Probably because round here, the bass and trout seemingly bite on whatever you throw in the water.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chuckiepoo
#41
#41
Kentucky did us a big favor last weekend. Ole Miss wasn’t thinking about UK and look what happened. Our coaching staff isn’t going to allow our guys to look past anyone. More importantly, I don’t think guys like Sampson, Big O, Pili and Mayes will let our guys go out there and not be focused and accountable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chuckiepoo
#42
#42
unfrozencvmanvol said:
There is literally none.
Click to expand...
Horse ****. Connor Stallions admits he sent people to Clemson and Tennessee games to scout each team as potential playoff opponents. There are numerous images of S Car players in both games looking at their wristbands, which happened in zero other games that season, and let's not forget the crazy fact that S Car dominated both Clemson and UT, legit PLAYOFF TEAMS, after getting drilled by UF at home.

The first two are direct evidence, the last is circumstantial but very compelling.

MSN

www.msn.com

Michigan scouted a Tennessee game in person. And thanks to a report from Football Scoop, we know that Michigan may have shared that information with another program to help disrupt a program's path to the playoff last season.
South Carolina defensive coordinator Clayton White worked under Michigan head coach Jim Harbaugh at Stanford
South Carolina head coach Shane Beamer has been fined before for accepting information about a program's game plans.
Sources told FootballScoop this week that the Wolverines had scouted SEC foes, including Georgia and Tennessee, as potential College Football Playoff adversaries.
Moreover, a source with direct knowledge indicated to FootballScoop that Michigan may have attempted to assist the opposition of a potential CFP opponent in an effort to disrupt that team's potential path to the Playoff.
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/4g-LlTX0KvM/maxresdefault.jpg (wrist band image)
 
  • Like
Reactions: -GiveHim6-, 508mikey, Alto1 and 1 other person
#43
#43
unfrozencvmanvol said:
Connor had people attend numerous games of contenders to scout them in case Michigan played them. There is zero evidence Michigan gave any signals to South Carolina. In any event, it wasn't their defense that beat us, it was their offense, our offense scored 36 and would have scored more had Hooker not gotten hurt. Wearing wristbands on defense isn't illegal and seems to be a reasonable attempt at improvement considering the speed of our offense and the fact that they had given up 38 the week before. South Carolina just got better late that year, it happens. They also beat Clemson on the road and played a good Notre Dame team a tough game in the Gator Bowl right after us. We just walked into a night game hornet's nest on the road in the SEC, and Rattler got hot, fueling the upset. Happens pretty regularly in our conference.
Click to expand...
"it wasn't their defense that beat us"

No! It wasn't! No one said it was! They stole ALL our signals, including OUR defensive signals, which explains how they scored...wait for it....SIXTY THREE POINTS!

Holy **** bro. I should not have to explain that, but apparently I do. Unreal.

As for the wristbands, they didn't wear them except against UT and Clemson. One might reasonably conclude they had nothing to put on them in other games.

As for beating Clemson, Clemson was another team scouted by Michigan!

Try to keep up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: -GiveHim6-, Dro and Alto1
#44
#44
DirtyDawg said:
I don’t know anything about S Car getting the signs but I’ve sure heard plenty say they did on this forum. My issue is, I haven’t heard it anywhere else. I’m not saying it did or didn’t happen, but I’d really like to see the evidence you’re talking about, or just tell me what the evidence is. I don’t even need to see it. I’m sincerely not being a smart-ass, I’m just interested in this if it’s true.
Click to expand...
See previous two posts. Your team is also mentioned.
 
  • Like
Reactions: -GiveHim6-, DirtyDawg and chuckiepoo
#45
#45
BanditVol said:
"it wasn't their defense that beat us"

No! It wasn't! No one said it was! They stole ALL our signals, including OUR defensive signals, which explains how they scored...wait for it....SIXTY THREE POINTS!

Holy **** bro. I should not have to explain that, but apparently I do. Unreal.

As for the wristbands, they didn't wear them except against UT and Clemson. One might reasonably conclude they had nothing to put on them in other games.

As for beating Clemson, Clemson was another team scouted by Michigan!

Try to keep up.
Click to expand...
Try taking a deep breath. He’s trolling.
 
#46
#46
BanditVol said:
"it wasn't their defense that beat us"

No! It wasn't! No one said it was! They stole ALL our signals, including OUR defensive signals, which explains how they scored...wait for it....SIXTY THREE POINTS!

Holy **** bro. I should not have to explain that, but apparently I do. Unreal.

As for the wristbands, they didn't wear them except against UT and Clemson. One might reasonably conclude they had nothing to put on them in other games.

As for beating Clemson, Clemson was another team scouted by Michigan!

Try to keep up.
Click to expand...
That's some weapons grade copium there bro. There is NO EVIDENCE that Michigan gave signals to South Carolina, none at all.
 
#47
#47
BanditVol said:
Horse ****. Connor Stallions admits he sent people to Clemson and Tennessee games to scout each team as potential playoff opponents. There are numerous images of S Car players in both games looking at their wristbands, which happened in zero other games that season, and let's not forget the crazy fact that S Car dominated both Clemson and UT, legit PLAYOFF TEAMS, after getting drilled by UF at home.

The first two are direct evidence, the last is circumstantial but very compelling.

MSN

www.msn.com

Michigan scouted a Tennessee game in person. And thanks to a report from Football Scoop, we know that Michigan may have shared that information with another program to help disrupt a program's path to the playoff last season.
South Carolina defensive coordinator Clayton White worked under Michigan head coach Jim Harbaugh at Stanford
South Carolina head coach Shane Beamer has been fined before for accepting information about a program's game plans.
Sources told FootballScoop this week that the Wolverines had scouted SEC foes, including Georgia and Tennessee, as potential College Football Playoff adversaries.
Moreover, a source with direct knowledge indicated to FootballScoop that Michigan may have attempted to assist the opposition of a potential CFP opponent in an effort to disrupt that team's potential path to the Playoff.
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/4g-LlTX0KvM/maxresdefault.jpg (wrist band image)
Click to expand...
They scouted alot of teams that year that were contenders, teams that didn't lose. Evidence that they scouted Tennessee is not evidence they gave information regarding Tennessee to anyone else, so my statement is correct. Connor Stallions admitting he scouted multiple teams, including Tennessee, does not contradict that. No one disputes that Michigan scouted Tennessee, or Georgia, Alabama, TCU and others, they did.

As to the football scoop article, it is anonymous hearsay and let's be honest, as far as credibility is concerned, when saying "Football Scoop says...", you might as well say "some crackhead living in a box says...". Same level of credibility. So, no, double hearsay from a notoriously uncredible source is not evidence either, to the people who know what evidence is.
 
Last edited:
#48
#48
While our players might follow ESPN and various social media, I doubt they follow Volnation closely or at all.

If they do, let me say: Get your butt back in the film room, concentrate on beating Arky, and don't listen to a dang word said on VN. We're a bunch of knuckleheads with the combined football IQ of a Neyland South Stadium urinal. Listen to your coaches, execute what they tell you to execute, and don't ever come back here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chuckiepoo
#49
#49
SayUWantAreVOLution said:
While our players might follow ESPN and various social media, I doubt they follow Volnation closely or at all.

If they do, let me say: Get your butt back in the film room, concentrate on beating Arky, and don't listen to a dang word said on VN. We're a bunch of knuckleheads with the combined football IQ of a Neyland South Stadium urinal. Listen to your coaches, execute what they tell you to execute, and don't ever come back here.
Click to expand...
Or maybe just read about the "Archie Who?" game.
Seriously, we know the coach isn't looking past Arkansas; he's said "one game at a time" several times. Hopefully the team listens and does as he says/asks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chuckiepoo and SayUWantAreVOLution
#50
#50

unfrozencvmanvol said:
They scouted alot of teams that year that were contenders, teams that didn't lose. Evidence that they scouted Tennessee is not evidence they gave information regarding Tennessee to anyone else, so my statement is correct. Connor Stallions admitting he scouted multiple teams, including Tennessee, does not contradict that. No one disputes that Michigan scouted Tennessee, or Georgia, Alabama, TCU and others, they did.

As to the football scoop article, it is anonymous hearsay and let's be honest, as far as credibility is concerned, when saying "Football Scoop says...", you might as well say "some crackhead living in a box says...". Same level of credibility. So, no, double hearsay from a notoriously uncredible source is not evidence either, to the people who know what evidence is.
Click to expand...

So you have an opinion that FootballScoop is "notoriously uncredible" (PS "uncredible is not a word you dolt). that's your opinion. They say it came from a source. You can disagree, but an eye witness source IS evidence. So there could be evidence. Neither one of us knows for sure. The difference between me and you is I am not claiming I KNOW the evidence is unimpeachable (that IS a word, by the way). You are flat stating "there is no evidence" because apparently you are God almighty and know all and see all. Sorry to break your bubble, but you are not, in fact, Yahweh. 🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: -GiveHim6-, Dro and 508mikey
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top