Praise Our Vols, But Don't Poison Them- 😊

#51
#51
unfrozencvmanvol said:
That's some weapons grade copium there bro. There is NO EVIDENCE that Michigan gave signals to South Carolina, none at all.
Click to expand...
See my other response for my opinion of you "knowing" there was NO EVIDENCE (why you shouting bro?).

Speaking of credibility, when a poster states that "it would not have done S Carolina any good to steal our offensive signals since we scored 38", but EVERYONE FOLLOWING THIS ISSUE (since you like to shout), knows it was DEFENSIVE signals alleged to have made a difference in the game, then you have zero credibility.

You seem pretty thick to me. Maybe rode the short bus in elementary school?

As for the "copium" shot, I am on record earlier in this thread saying that the alleged fight and actual suspension of Jeremy Banks had a big effect, as well as the team likely overlooking what seemed a greatly overmatched foe.

But South Carolina lost 38-6 to UF the week before they played us, then scored 63 on us. A person would have to be a complete ****ing idiot to not smell a rat. Or hopelessly naive.

I have an opinion which you are. See if you can figure it out. 🤣
 
#52
#52
BanditVol said:
See my other response for my opinion of you "knowing" there was NO EVIDENCE (why you shouting bro?).

Speaking of credibility, when a poster states that "it would not have done S Carolina any good to steal our offensive signals since we scored 38", but EVERYONE FOLLOWING THIS ISSUE (since you like to shout), knows it was DEFENSIVE signals alleged to have made a difference in the game, then you have zero credibility.

You seem pretty thick to me. Maybe rode the short bus in elementary school?

As for the "copium" shot, I am on record earlier in this thread saying that the alleged fight and actual suspension of Jeremy Banks had a big effect, as well as the team likely overlooking what seemed a greatly overmatched foe.

But South Carolina lost 38-6 to UF the week before they played us, then scored 63 on us. A person would have to be a complete ****ing idiot to not smell a rat. Or hopelessly naive.

I have an opinion which you are. See if you can figure it out. 🤣
Click to expand...
Cope harder, I think you can. It's entertaining.
 
#53
#53
BanditVol said:
So you have an opinion that FootballScoop is "notoriously uncredible" (PS "uncredible is not a word you dolt). that's your opinion. They say it came from a source. You can disagree, but an eye witness source IS evidence. So there could be evidence. Neither one of us knows for sure. The difference between me and you is I am not claiming I KNOW the evidence is unimpeachable (that IS a word, by the way). You are flat stating "there is no evidence" because apparently you are God almighty and know all and see all. Sorry to break your bubble, but you are not, in fact, Yahweh. 🤣
Click to expand...
An article saying "hey an anonymous source told me" is textbook hearsay, which is not evidence. I don't KNOW there is no evidence, I just KNOW no one has produced any.

P.S. you also seem new to college football, how did Auburn lose to New Mexico State last year and then a week later take Alabama to the brink? It's pretty common in this sport, there is no transitive property, as Lou Holtz used to say "you have a different team every week". Anyway, hit me with some more cope, as I said, while it's pathetic that a presumably grown man can't just man up and give another team credit, it's also entertaining to hear the evidence free excuses.
 
Last edited:
#54
#54
unfrozencvmanvol said:
An article saying "hey an anonymous source told me" is textbook hearsay, which is not evidence. I don't KNOW there is no evidence, I just KNOW no one has produced any.

P.S. you seem new to college football, how did Auburn lose to New Mexico State last year and then a week later take Alabama to the brink? It's pretty common in this sport, there is no transitive property, as Lou Holtz used to say "you have a different team every week". Anyway, hit me with some more cope, as I said, while it's pathetic that a presumably grown man can't just man up and give another team credit, it's also entertaining to hear the evidence free excuses.
Click to expand...
Anyone thats not an idiot or troll could use deductive reasoning to conclude that SC cheated, You're never gonna get a hard video of Michigan handing them tapes if thats what you're asking for.


Been fined for taking info in the past
Multiple sources saying they DID take info on Tennessee/Clemson
Has ties to the program that was Deep scouting Tennessee/Clemson
Wearing wristbands for one game then never wearing them again
Lost 38-6 at home the week prior to beating 2 top 10 teams back to back. Scoring 63 in one of them then NEVER scoring over 50 again or even beating a ranked team in 2 years.
That Iron bowl reference is a false equivalance, Classic rivarly games like that one and OSU/Mich are usually always close regardless of how good/bad the teams are, SC aren't our rivals at all and we smoked them by 20+ the other 2 times we've played. If you wanted to use that to argue against them cheating against Clemson you could. but that still doesn't explain the tennessee game.


If your girl had a history of cheating, Multiple people said they saw your girl cheating, but noone had video proof of them porking your girl You wouldn't stay and give her the benefit of the doubt, and if you would you know what that makes you. I'd feel bad for you. 🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: -GiveHim6-
#55
#55
Dro said:
If your girl had a history of cheating, Multiple people said they saw your girl cheating, but noone had video proof of them porking your girl You wouldn't stay and give her the benefit of the doubt, and if you would you know what that makes you. I'd feel bad for you. 🤣
Click to expand...
That would be eyewitness testimony, which would be valid evidence, something that is absent from CopeGate. Again, weird scores happen regularly in CFB, it's just excuse making at this point. We are Tennessee. We ought to be above such loser behavior.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: J C Higgins
#56
#56
Dro said:
Anyone thats not an idiot or troll could use deductive reasoning to conclude that SC cheated, You're never gonna get a hard video of Michigan handing them tapes if thats what you're asking for.


Been fined for taking info in the past
Multiple sources saying they DID take info on Tennessee/Clemson
Has ties to the program that was Deep scouting Tennessee/Clemson
Wearing wristbands for one game then never wearing them again
Lost 38-6 at home the week prior to beating 2 top 10 teams back to back. Scoring 63 in one of them then NEVER scoring over 50 again or even beating a ranked team in 2 years.
That Iron bowl reference is a false equivalance, Classic rivarly games like that one and OSU/Mich are usually always close regardless of how good/bad the teams are, SC aren't our rivals at all and we smoked them by 20+ the other 2 times we've played. If you wanted to use that to argue against them cheating against Clemson you could. but that still doesn't explain the tennessee game.


If your girl had a history of cheating, Multiple people said they saw your girl cheating, but noone had video proof of them porking your girl You wouldn't stay and give her the benefit of the doubt, and if you would you know what that makes you. I'd feel bad for you. 🤣
Click to expand...
Newsflash genius...I never said I KNEW that south carolina cheated, just that there was a lot of evidence, circumstantial, and otherwise, that they had. And yes, eyewitness testimony is a form of evidence, even though we only have it as hearsay.

I have more than made my point with you, and dont want to waste any more of my very precious time.

Bye!
 
#57
#57
unfrozencvmanvol said:
Cope harder, I think you can. It's entertaining.
Click to expand...
I'm not coping, in fact, I have stated above that (a) I am not 100% sure there was cheating (but do find it very possible), and (b) we may have lost even if they had not cheated, but it would have been closer.

What I am doing is laughing at how stupid you are for suggesting that stolen offensive signals might have made a difference in the game. That's next level idiocy when we scored 38 points, and, oh yeah! Hooker was out for over a quarter!!!! You are not really very bright are you?

Nice try to change the subject.

As I posted in my other response, not wasting anymore time with you. As stated by another poster who likely knows you from previous encounters, you are the one trolling here. I have better things to do than argue with someone who may well not have graduated high school.

Good day to you sir!
 
#58
#58
Amazes me that we still have posters who think what fans say on a message board has any impact on the outcome of a game or season.

Like the the guys are sitting around the locker room getting taped up when one of them says “Hey guys, yall see that dope thread WoodsmanVol started yesterday? Ya know, he’s right, we gotta stay humble in order to achieve our goals……thank goodness I logged on to VN today to catch what Woodsman was laying down”
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dro
#61
#61
#62
#62
BanditVol said:
I'm not coping, in fact, I have stated above that (a) I am not 100% sure there was cheating (but do find it very possible), and (b) we may have lost even if they had not cheated, but it would have been closer.

What I am doing is laughing at how stupid you are for suggesting that stolen offensive signals might have made a difference in the game. That's next level idiocy when we scored 38 points, and, oh yeah! Hooker was out for over a quarter!!!! You are not really very bright are you?

Nice try to change the subject.

As I posted in my other response, not wasting anymore time with you. As stated by another poster who likely knows you from previous encounters, you are the one trolling here. I have better things to do than argue with someone who may well not have graduated high school.

Good day to you sir!
Click to expand...
In addition to your inability to man up, I now also question your ability to read the English language. You are now agreeing with my original post, lol.

Screenshot_20241004_100538_Chrome~2.jpg
 
#63
#63
WillisWG said:
The Vols will have shored up their pass protection enough. Tennessee’s defensive front against Arkansas’ offensive line is too big of a mismatch to ignore. Josh Heupel’s team keeps rolling. Vols 38, Razorbacks 24
www.rockytopinsider.com

Tennessee Football Preview: Vols Look To Stay Undefeated With SEC Clash Against Arkansas | Rocky Top Insider

Check out Rocky Top Insider's full, extensive preview for the Tennessee vs Arkansas game this Saturday night in Razorback Stadium.
www.rockytopinsider.com www.rockytopinsider.com
Click to expand...
Yawn.

Are you still here? I told you I was done with this. Are you dense? Wait. What am I asking. Of course you are! 🤣
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top