Nash_Vol97
Smells like potential
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2016
- Messages
- 18,212
- Likes
- 67,141
Why is there an assumption that City will “fall off” when Pep leaves. We might not be as good but does anyone think under current leadership that a slouch coach will be hired? What if Arteta came back?From Le Grove’s Twitter…….I kind of agree with this.
Arsenal aged down their squad this summer. As painful as it is to hear, the underlying strategy of our recruitment policy is to be ready when City lands a brutal shock to the system (Pep leaving)... if this season was about the jugular, we'd have signed 28 yr old machete players.
Does that mean we're trying not to compete? No. Does it mean we can't win the league this season? No. But it does mean you have to contextualise 1) Why Arteta broke down what felt like a winning machine 2) Why he's moving towards formational fluidity 3) Why he's taking risks so early on with heavy rotation.
We topple City by investing in better ideas. Our idea last season was the same 13 until they broke. It was too predictable and too prone to breaking down. This new idea is wild unpredictability against anyone. That'll take time to hone.
Breaking what seemed like a winning machine was brave. If Wenger had our squad from last season this summer - he'd have kept Xhaka and renewed everyone. 'One or two special players' was Wenger's promise for years and it didn't work. Arteta and Edu are trying to create a winning machine that can do it for a decade.
That requires some short term pain - but longterm, we'll be more Manchester City than Liverpool (who rapidly declined after winning the league because they had an old starting 11).
No one will complain when we arrive at the promised land - but there will be bumps along the way. Mistakes will be made (loads today), there will be **** performances, and there will be terrible experiments that won't work. But I think we've seen enough from Arteta to know he'll get it right in the end.
I wonder if any further suspension will be added for the way he exited the pitch. He was pretty aggressive with both the on-field referee and the fourth official, which I don't really understand because he had absolutely no room for complaint. That was a stone cold red. Isak had rolled him perfectly and was in on goal. I guess VVD did *technically* win the ball, but only after steamrolling straight though Isak.Made contact from behind denying a clear path to goal.
I wonder if any further suspension will be added for the way he exited the pitch. He was pretty aggressive with both the on-field referee and the fourth official, which I don't really understand because he had absolutely no room for complaint. That was a stone cold red. Isak had rolled him perfectly and was in on goal. I guess VVD did *technically* win the ball, but only after steamrolling straight though Isak.
I would assume most people would say because there is only 1 Pep. He is possibly the GOAT in some eyes and would be hard to replace. I’m not saying impossible, but it would be hard to replicate.Why is there an assumption that City will “fall off” when Pep leaves. We might not be as good but does anyone think under current leadership that a slouch coach will be hired? What if Arteta came back?
From Le Grove’s Twitter…….I kind of agree with this.
Arsenal aged down their squad this summer. As painful as it is to hear, the underlying strategy of our recruitment policy is to be ready when City lands a brutal shock to the system (Pep leaving)... if this season was about the jugular, we'd have signed 28 yr old machete players.
Does that mean we're trying not to compete? No. Does it mean we can't win the league this season? No. But it does mean you have to contextualise 1) Why Arteta broke down what felt like a winning machine 2) Why he's moving towards formational fluidity 3) Why he's taking risks so early on with heavy rotation.
We topple City by investing in better ideas. Our idea last season was the same 13 until they broke. It was too predictable and too prone to breaking down. This new idea is wild unpredictability against anyone. That'll take time to hone.
Breaking what seemed like a winning machine was brave. If Wenger had our squad from last season this summer - he'd have kept Xhaka and renewed everyone. 'One or two special players' was Wenger's promise for years and it didn't work. Arteta and Edu are trying to create a winning machine that can do it for a decade.
That requires some short term pain - but longterm, we'll be more Manchester City than Liverpool (who rapidly declined after winning the league because they had an old starting 11).
No one will complain when we arrive at the promised land - but there will be bumps along the way. Mistakes will be made (loads today), there will be **** performances, and there will be terrible experiments that won't work. But I think we've seen enough from Arteta to know he'll get it right in the end.
Been a lurker for a while, but first time posting. I've been following LFC for 17 years and seeing a lot of VVD's red being a stonewall red. However various pundits (Clattenburg, Lineker, etc.) said it was harsh. The refs have been absolutely horrible this year (e.g. no foul on Onana vs Wolves, Mac Allister red, Tomiyasu red, etc.). The first yellow on TAA should've been a foul on Anthony Gordon. Joelinton was spotted twice motioning a card in the air, which I thought was suppose to warrant an immediate card. Nevermind the many fouls committed without a card. Both Joelinton and Bruno G had 4+ fouls each without a card. I saw a stat (admittedly, I have not verified) where only once all of last season where a LFC player had 4+ fouls and didn't receive a card - it occurred once by Luis Diaz. I also thought EPL was placing an emphasis on number of managers allowed in technical area to 1 and it seemed Jason Tindall spent a lot of time there. Their entire staff stood up at the second TAA foul and all clamored for a yellow. There was another weird incident in the game where LFC had a throw in and the ball boy threw a second ball onto the pitch. LFC players were bemused still trying to play and ball went out - Ref awarded a throw to Newcastle. Ironically, John Brooks is the same ref who didn't award a foul when Gakpo took studs to the chest drawing blood last season.