President blasts Steve Bannon

#127
#127
golfballs said:
To a far far lesser extent. Trump endorsed him at the end only because he had an R next to his name and another D could further hamstring his agenda in the Senate. That's a far cry from the support he got from Bannon
Click to expand...

I think we can agree that Roy Moore was the debacle and only by the grace of both people's support he got as many votes as he did.
 
#128
#128
golfballs said:
I think Bannon has lost it.
[twitter]https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/949042367591600129[/twitter]

If the Roy Moore debacle wasn't enough, this certainly cements himself as a has-been with little support.
Click to expand...

Yeah, it's Bannon that's 'lost it'.

What happened to "the gloves are going to come off now", "bannon is no longer handcuffed"? LOL

It's got to suck to watch the Mayor of Doucheville drop these behind the scenes nuggets on trump. I'd have paid good money to watch dotard donny's reaction to hearing that Bannon sold him out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
#129
#129
Its not picking sides. It's whether what Bannon says was going on, was going on. No one is denying it with any specificity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#136
#136
1972 Grad said:
Stayed neutral against a Democrat when he needed that Republican vote? Sure.
Click to expand...

They lost Alabama to a dude who is pro choice. They couldn't even beat a guy nicknamed 'abortion jones'.

Lol,let that sht sink in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
#142
#142
WaPo:

"I am apparently not the only one who has questioned the president’s ability to focus on the written word. “Trump didn’t read,” Wolff writes. “He didn’t really even skim. If it was print, it might as well not exist. Some believed that for all practical purposes he was no more than semiliterate. Others concluded that he didn’t read because he didn’t have to . . . He was postliterate — total television.” But “Fire and Fury” reveals that White House staff and Cabinet members believed Trump’s intellectual challenges went well beyond having a limited reading list: Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin called him an “idiot,” Cohn dismissed him as “dumb,” national security adviser H.R. McMaster considered him a “dope,” and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson infamously concluded that the commander in chief was a “moron.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
#143
#143
OuterBanksVol said:
WaPo:

"I am apparently not the only one who has questioned the president’s ability to focus on the written word. “Trump didn’t read,” Wolff writes. “He didn’t really even skim. If it was print, it might as well not exist. Some believed that for all practical purposes he was no more than semiliterate. Others concluded that he didn’t read because he didn’t have to . . . He was postliterate — total television.” But “Fire and Fury” reveals that White House staff and Cabinet members believed Trump’s intellectual challenges went well beyond having a limited reading list: Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin called him an “idiot,” Cohn dismissed him as “dumb,” national security adviser H.R. McMaster considered him a “dope,” and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson infamously concluded that the commander in chief was a “moron.”
Click to expand...

To summarize the bolded...........DOTARD
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#144
#144
luthervol said:
To summarize the bolded...........DOTARD
Click to expand...

To summarize the author...

Liar.

Michael Wolff says he can't be sure if parts of explosive Trump book are true - AOL News

The author of the explosive new book about Donald Trump's presidency admitted that he isn't certain that it's all true.

Michael Wolff, the author of "Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House," included a note at the start which casts significant doubt on the reliability of the specifics contained in the rest of its pages.

A number of his sources, he says, were definitely lying to him, while some offered accounts that flatly contradict those of others.

But they were nonetheless included in the vivid account of the West Wing's workings, in a process Wolff describes as "allowing the reader to judge" whether they are true.
Click to expand...

So, we are faced with "utter bull****" as the content of the book.
 
#146
#146
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#147
#147
Mick said:
Has anyone denied the quotes in the book?
Click to expand...

luthervol said:
At least two people have confirmed that the parts that relate to them are true. No one has claimed that every thing is true. What the book provides is great insight into the Trump white house. Truths, half truths, and lies all jumbled together is Trump at his finest.
Click to expand...

You both are so desperate for it to be true, you never even stopped to think "maybe things were stretched just a tad..."
 
#148
#148
Grand Vol said:
You both are so desperate for it to be true, you never even stopped to think "maybe things were stretched just a tad..."
Click to expand...

The flip side.....

Some people are so desperate for it to be false, they ignore the overwhelming evidence that much of it is true. They never even stopped to think "maybe the Trump white house is a dysfunctional zoo."
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
#149
#149
Grand Vol said:
You both are so desperate for it to be true, you never even stopped to think "maybe things were stretched just a tad..."
Click to expand...

I'm sure there were stretches, bias, and misleading stuff in the book but to call the whole thing BS is BS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#150
#150
luthervol said:
The flip side.....

Some people are so desperate for it to be false, they ignore the overwhelming evidence that much of it is true. They never even stopped to think "maybe the Trump white house is a dysfunctional zoo."
Click to expand...

Okay, now the next question will be:

"Why?"

How many other times in history have any Presidents gone into the White House having the deck stacked against them like Trump has? And don't claim it's his polarizing style. **** that was leaking is and was stupid as hell.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top