President Bush's Farewell

#26
#26
I never have understood the point of showing an election map. What does it prove other than what we already know, less people live in rural America. Are you suggesting country folk should have their vote count twice or something?

i don't see why not, people in the big cities voted 2-3 times. might as well.
 
#27
#27
he could have layed out his objectives better and help fought the bias against him. i know it wouldn't have stopped the papers from lying about him but at least it would have been on record.

Hussein O doesn't have to worry that. he's going to get a free pass with the media.

Who reads the paper anymore?
 
#28
#28
he could have layed out his objectives better and help fought the bias against him. i know it wouldn't have stopped the papers from lying about him but at least it would have been on record.

Hussein O doesn't have to worry that. he's going to get a free pass with the media.
Obama will get blistered, it just won't be from the major media. The WSJ and Fox will cream him at every turn, unless he operates sensibly.
 
#31
#31
And your proof of this is?

just reading various news article that came from pieces besides the ny times and watching news shows. one of the shows that i was watching the reporter asked a guy about voting. he specifically said he voted twice. he was very happy the fact that he was able to vote twice.
 
#33
#33
Obama will get blistered, it just won't be from the major media. The WSJ and Fox will cream him at every turn, unless he operates sensibly.

that's 2 news outlets of thousands. the ny times, abc, nbc, cnn, cbs and many others will do little to no investigating on this administration, unless it's concerning the dog hussein O is chosing.
 
#34
#34
that's 2 news outlets of thousands. the ny times, abc, nbc, cnn, cbs and many others will do little to no investigating on this administration, unless it's concerning the dog hussein O is chosing.
I understand, but those are two pretty strong voices. People now watch Fox to ridicule the right opinion, much the same as I do with all the others. That means lefty clowns like LG are constantly watching. That helps.
 
#35
#35
I never have understood the point of showing an election map. What does it prove other than what we already know, less people live in rural America. Are you suggesting country folk should have their vote count twice or something?

No but cities should do something to stop the blatant wide spread corruption going on under their watch!!!!

i don't see why not, people in the big cities voted 2-3 times. might as well.

I voted twice in the '72 election in Memphis, when I noticed another guy who was in line with me at both locations and stuck up a conversation, he chided me as being a rank amateur, since he was voting in six precincts and said he would be voting in seven the next election since he had an auntie moving to Raleigh.

you have to have a large ACORN community. i don't know if nashville is big enough.

Nashville is certainly big enough, they caught a Democrat activist in the run up to the 2006 election with about 250 new registrations that were just made up out of thin air, he gave a homeless shelter as the home address for something like 200 of them.

Nothing much ever came of it though.

That sort of thing should definitely be a felony!

If only Fulmer could have been as contrite as Bush... but it wasn't in his nature. (sorry, wrong thread)

Fulmer showed ten times the class of Johnny Majors!!!

BTW, Gore and Kerry were the worst whiny losers in American history.
 
#36
#36
GWB has handled leaving office much better than some ex-presidents have...no furniture has gone missing from the White House has it?
 
#38
#38
History will be the ultimate judge, with the outcome of Iraq being the flagstone litmus test, as to how Bush actually did.
 
#39
#39
History will be the ultimate judge, with the outcome of Iraq being the flagstone litmus test, as to how Bush actually did.

One thing is for sure and certain, Saddam Hussein won't be leading the forces of evil against us in the "mother of all wars."
 
#44
#44
I think emotions drive a lot of the opinions on Bush on both sides of the aisle. With a decade or two of new events, new politicians to despise, I think Bush will be remembered as a president during an eventful stretch of time that had his ups and downs. No more, no less.
 
#46
#46
I don't think he's going to like how he is going to be remembered.

99.9% of Americans will never know the info contained in the briefings he received that helped shape his policies. Why should he care what people who have little or no facts think about his decisions?
 
#48
#48
99.9% of Americans will never know the info contained in the briefings he received that helped shape his policies. Why should he care what people who have little or no facts think about his decisions?

Along the same lines, the world isn't as black and white as some make it out to be with the benefit of hindsight. You can make the right decisions for the wrong reasons, or the wrong decisions for the right reasons.
 
#49
#49
99.9% of Americans will never know the info contained in the briefings he received that helped shape his policies. Why should he care what people who have little or no facts think about his decisions?

His father had similar briefings and chose not to go in. The CIA told him most of their evidence was he didn't have WMD's. Bush chose to go ahead. Then he turned around and blamed the CIA for the policy failure.
 
Last edited:
#50
#50
99.9% of Americans will never know the info contained in the briefings he received that helped shape his policies. Why should he care what people who have little or no facts think about his decisions?

The president should always care about the perception of him and his office. He works for the citizens of the US.

This was probably his biggest problem while in office. He didn't care and pushed the agendas of a few instead of the masses.
 

VN Store



Back
Top