President Donald Trump - J.D. Vance Administration

There's a difference between those last two things.

The post does not say or imply what he seemed to want out of it, so he manufactured a problem. He does not care about his fellow American, he has repeatedly done this. What these State and local officials have been doing is illegal under the Laws of the U.S. as a generalization i.e. harboring.
🥥🥜🍩🌰🔩
 
Are you saying they are not?
I’m saying that leftist are the most intolerant people in this country. Agree with them or die! Yet they are painted as the party of tolerance and understanding.


So yes. It’s seems ridiculously hypocritical when the party of tolerance and understanding are seen carrying around a guillotine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dovervolz and sami
Why on earth should my tax dollars go to arresting a mayor who has shelters that house illegals so they're not on their streets? That's their fkn business. You realize they're attracting illegals who otherwise might be in your city, right?

Why would your tax dollars go to provide incentive for a criminal to continue to commit a crime?

What the mayor is doing in that instance if they are aware is a federal crime, the local administrator once he/she knows could be a party in a federal crime. Most likely felonies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: USF grad in TN
what? What do 2024/25 pardons have to do with Trump not being there in 2021?

his ego couldn't take it. its not like they were going to execute him the moment Biden swore in.

Do you seriously need a picture drawn for you? Why do you think Biden is preemptively pardoning the clowns in that "J6 committee"? If the election was as "free and fair" as the regime insisted it was while shaming any naysayers, what need is there to protect these people from prosecution?
 
  • Like
Reactions: CABVOL
I’m saying that leftist are the most intolerant people in this country. Agree with them or die! Yet they are painted as the party of tolerance and understanding.

So yes. It’s seems ridiculously hypocritical when the party of tolerance and understanding are seen carrying around a guillotine.

Do you think that when they boast they are tolerant that they mean they are tolerant of political ideas/politicians that they hate? That's not what they mean. They mean they are tolerant of your skin color, orientation, etc.
 
Why would your tax dollars go to provide incentive for a criminal to continue to commit a crime?

What the mayor is doing in that instance if they are aware is a federal crime, the local administrator once he/she knows could be a party in a federal crime. Most likely felonies.

Muh laws. No one should ever talk to you about anything on this board.

1737406266920.png
 
I’m saying that leftist are the most intolerant people in this country. Agree with them or die! Yet they are painted as the party of tolerance and understanding.


So yes. It’s seems ridiculously hypocritical when the party of tolerance and understanding are seen carrying around a guillotine.
Don't forget that most of the mass shootings are carried out by a liberal .
 
Do you think that when they boast they are tolerant that they mean they are tolerant of political ideas/politicians that they hate? That's not what they mean. They mean they are tolerant of your skin color, orientation, etc. so long as you agree with them on every issue. Then, for instance, if you disagree with them, you will go from being embraced as a black man to being labeled an Uncle Tom.
Finished your post.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83
Follow yes but not to enforce or help enforce.

We want governors who will tell the Feds to piss off, not kowtow to federal authority.

I have to say that I agree with you here. Problem is that the left has expanded federal power to such a ridiculous extent over the last 20 years (yes, Bush is part of the left) that it has completely emasculated the idea of states' rights.
 
Muh laws. No one should ever talk to you about anything on this board.

View attachment 715959

I have no idea what you are even talking about. What you are crying about is the Law, for obvious reason its the Law. If its against the Law, logic would say that the person should be criminally prosecuted or why have the Law?

You're not making any sense what so ever.

"Breaking news, its a crime to harbor criminal illegal aliens, news at 5".
 
I have to say that I agree with you here. Problem is that the left has expanded federal power to such a ridiculous extent over the last 20 years (yes, Bush is part of the left) that it has completely emasculated the idea of states' rights.

Agreed and it's time to fight back, if it takes liberal governors to start the pushback then so be it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LouderVol
Do you think that when they boast they are tolerant that they mean they are tolerant of political ideas/politicians that they hate? That's not what they mean. They mean they are tolerant of your skin color, orientation, etc.

They are tolerant only of ideas and worldviews that agree with their own. There is no room for debate with the left because they believe they are morally correct on every issue. I've never had a discussion with a hardcore leftist that didn't end with them either shouting, calling names, or leaving, and it's usually all three.

As for their tolerance of skin color, have you ever seen a conservative black or Hispanic person that thinks for themselves who wasn't savaged by the left because they didn't have the plantation mentality and just fall in line? Tolerance has its limits, I suppose.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83
Agreed and it's time to fight back, if it takes liberal governors to start the pushback then so be it.

As if these leftist Governors would actually be doing it for the sake of States rights. We’ve got the last 85 years as evidenced to the contrary. They may do it in the name of States rights (even that’s doubtful) but you and I both know that’s the last damn thing they care about. Only when they are faced with not holding the highest Federal Government offices do they even utter the words “States rights”.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83 and sami
As if these leftist Governors would actually be doing it for the sake of States rights. We’ve got the last 85 years as evidenced to the contrary. They may do it in the name of States rights (even that’s doubtful) but you and I both know that’s the last damn thing they care about. Only when they are faced with not holding the highest Federal Government offices do they even utter the words “States rights”.

That should almost never be the reason a governor does anything. The motivation should be some other benefit, with states' rights being the mechanism that allows them to do it. JFC, people!
 

VN Store



Back
Top