President Donald Trump - J.D. Vance Administration

#12,401
#12,401
Orangeslice13 said:
This is where it started @luthervol

Dude, you’re impossible to converse with.
Take note that it’s the board that was referred not the PF.
And even if you move the goalposts to that thread alone the number wasn’t even 50% who rooted against the ladies soccer team.
Jesus dude you can’t be this dense
Click to expand...
Please look at the highlighted part of your post below. Those are your words.

Orangeslice13 said:
55k people on this board.
No way 8250 of them cared or knew anything about it
Click to expand...
Again, I don't care; it's no big deal. I made a relatively insignificant (YET TRUE) statement.
There are some in the PF (I guess you are included), that feel it is their obligation as a true PATRIOT and red blooded trumper to nitpick anything and everything I post. They are pretty much always wrong and it is almost always due to reading what they think I am saying instead of what I am actually saying.

In this instance, you were obviously the mover of the goal posts.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BernardKingGOAT
#12,403
#12,403
NCFisher said:
No, I'm not in favor of abortion; it's a barbaric practice that I don't have an answer to except that it be referred to the states as currently exists. If a life-saving procedure is needed by the mother and denied due to shite law, that law should be challenged. No reassignment surgery needed.

Same for screwing with the minds, bodies of minors by ideologically and physically putting them at unnecessary risk by the state even to the point of keeping parents in the dark or threatening to separate them; it's unconscionable and should also be challenged. We should control our border, know who's coming in and whether they provide a net positive or negative to American society. We don't have to care and only concentrate on one thing; I can walk and chew gum at the same time.

Here's some more bold, reiterated in bold: "I think Federal court is the proper place to sort it." and "I like that as a republic, the two are set against each other in reaching resolution to resolve and respect those things."

If that's lawless authoritarianism, it explains your characterizing J6 as an insurrection (if you were).
Click to expand...
I didn’t think you were in favor of abortion. I said that your argument is formulated the same way as the classic Roe/Casey defense: emotionally declaiming how bad the outcomes are and declaring that the individual has a right to be free from such bad outcomes.

Like the anbortion argument, the claim of an individual right is extremely thin. There’s no right to be free from all bad outcomes resulting from legislation, and the severity of the outcome doesn’t go into the formation of a right (and even if it were a right, it wouldn’t justify using a blunderbuss to lawlessly withhold funds from the entire state).

The things in bold aren’t that bold, unless they could be called a bold step back from what you were saying before, but I respect the tacit admission that you were wrong before and mostly agree with this new, non-authoritarian version of your argument. No rebuttal.
 
#12,404
#12,404
luthervol said:
Please look at the highlighted part of your post below. Those are your words.


Again, I don't care; it's no big deal. I made a relatively insignificant (YET TRUE) statement.
There are some in the PF (I guess you are included), that feel it is their obligation as a true PATRIOT and red blooded trumper to nitpick anything and everything I post. They are pretty much always wrong and it is almost always due to reading what they think I am saying instead of what I am actually saying.

In this instance, you were obviously the mover of the goal posts.
Click to expand...
I don't think he's a Trumper, but your comment applies to other posters. "Knew you were a leftist", at any criticism of Trump
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top