President Donald Trump - J.D. Vance Administration

#12,566
#12,566
McDad said:
I guess that depends on how you define it. My beef is with the people who this is all they do. Not with the ones who do it limited, creatively, humorously, etc.
Click to expand...
I certainly understand continuums.
A little and a lot are not the same nor should they be viewed as such - in most instances.
All about that comparative line.
 
#12,568
#12,568
NCFisher said:
My dude,
screwed up the cut/paste so need to click to see responses.






You'd really have to discount everything up the self-determination quote, seize on that, and assume authoritarianism advocacy. You'd nearly have to want to see it to leap there.

Foremost, I'm glad the admin is taking this on. It was always going to be a court case. If they make a shite case, they'll lose; I obviously hope they make a sterling case because I think it simply wrong, from any angle. And I think a case - whether funds, a charge of violating IX rule or anti-discrimination law - a better prospect than you do with the intent of the rule restored. The Women's Sports Foundation has a number of examples: issues-related-to-girls-and-boys-competing-with-and-against-each-other-in-sports-and-physical-activity-settings-the-foundation-position.pdf.

What if the court ultimately finds against the WH or DOJ? Then I'll think the court is on the wrong side of the issue, and hope Mainers force revocation of their law. But pending that, or a better-presented case, it's dead. There's literally been no - and will be no - avenue for authoritarianism to travel. GTFO with claiming it. As stated earlier, like it or hate it, there are strings attached to Fed $.
Click to expand...
Like I said, I choose to respect your willingness to tacitly admit you were wrong by trying to retcon the conversation.
 
#12,572
#12,572
utvolpj said:
Click to expand...

All joking aside how long before we start running into AI generated fakes that are so numerous, so realistic and so easy to produce that almost everything you see could be legitimately questioned? And I don't mean just tiktoks or tweets but even at the government and courtroom level. Video evidence being the ultimate proof is headed toward being unreliable and we're practically back to he said/she said.
 
#12,574
#12,574
LouderVol said:
now see this is dedicated trolling if its real.

probably someone with their foot out the door anyway.
Click to expand...
Nice pun

At my previous company I could have changed all the displays in corporate and at any warehouse in the country (if onsite). Of course that was trackable so I'd imagine that person will be out soon
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
#12,575
#12,575
hndog609 said:
All joking aside how long before we start running into AI generated fakes that are so numerous, so realistic and so easy to produce that almost everything you see could be legitimately questioned? And I don't mean just tiktoks or tweets but even at the government and courtroom level. Video evidence being the ultimate proof is headed toward being unreliable and we're practically back to he said/she said.
Click to expand...
very very soon. its already been argued in the realm of politics. The "cheap fakes" were exactly that.

both sides are always going to be able to question it. its going to be the same with voice recordings. they can already use AI to perfectly match anyone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hndog609
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top