BreatheUT
The Universal Hearthrob!
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2017
- Messages
- 30,830
- Likes
- 41,950
you or @marcusluvsvols on duty tonite?
I said "beats me, it was his post" to the question about which state was being referenced.
BECAUSE IT DID NOT MATTER WHATSOEVER TO THE DISCUSSION
You always fixated on the trivial and insignificant detail while being completely oblivious to the bigger picture.
Another way of saying the bolded (at least for me) is:
"I've never known a people willingly yield so much power to a president. It's kind of amazing."
Can you give specifics?
I'll re-post Sea Ray's example:
"I'm stating a fact when I say that Trump has chosen our last 2 Senators and he will choose our next one, as well as our Governor."
That wasn't a fact. It was hyperbole.
Hyperbole aside, there were endorsements, and then there were elections.
I'm curious what your examples would be of voters ceding power to this president like never before.
And as has been mentioned, you were in a coma through Covid?
lol....
I just quoted exactly what Sea Ray posted.
How interesting that not a single person responded to his words when he posted them.....
but when I post his exact same words. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
It's too soon for me to assign fault but if courts are going to say that Trump can't cancel payments then it's going to be that much harder to get spending under controlOther than “George” calling him a “crooked Biden appointee” what is the basis for concluding that this is the court’s fault and not the administration’s fault?
FBI looking into James Comey’s off-the-books ‘honeypot’ operation targeting 2016 Trump campaign
We do need more nuclear power plants for sure, and aren't building them. That's why coal (a very powerful energy producer exceeding hydro in efficiency) will continue to be needed.Yet we shot ourselves in the foot with Nuclear and are woefully behind and hydro only works where you've got lakes and rivers.
Sounds like it's for a different reason. If an expenditure went through Congress and signed by a President, Trump can't just unilaterally cancel it. This probably has some validity. I wondered about this myselfIf it's for services already performed in accordance with contract/invoiced, then yes, those need to be paid....
I want cuts as much as anybody. I've seen a lot of people leeching off of the taxpayer get cut out.If it's for services already performed in accordance with contract/invoiced, then yes, those need to be paid....
"Trump" can't cancel it, but as far as I understand they don't have to use all the money. Allocated funds are swept up and returned all the time. It's why I don't understand the legal argument trying to force an agency to use money.Sounds like it's for a different reason. If an expenditure went through Congress and signed by a President, Trump can't just unilaterally cancel it. This probably has some validity. I wondered about this myself
It's too soon for me to assign fault but if courts are going to say that Trump can't cancel payments then it's going to be that much harder to get spending under control