President Donald Trump - J.D. Vance Administration

Your article fails to point out that in the U.S. population of 340 million, for example, a ratio of 1 in 80K - or about 4250 persons - have Swyers Syndrome. Of those, 15-20% exhibit presence of the SRY gene, or about 850 total persons. As correctly pointed out, these are biological chromosomal abnormalities. There are treatments to mitigate - to normalize - these biological deviancies to avoid infertility (a pretty necessary component of species propagation) and high-risk of osteoporosis.

In other words, these are maladies to be treated and researched to prevent. SA's attempt to harumph recognition of these chromosomal abnormalities as transphobia is simply advocacy agenda, not science. It is literally saying 'you don't understand sexual biology' when correctly asserting 339,995,750 of Americans are chromosomally normative. SA might as well say that acknowledging those with Symbrachydactyly (a congenital deformity or absence of fingers) present in 1 of 32K people, is as normal as those without the condition. That is, unless you're an activist scientist, you simply don't understand what normal fingers are.

You should read - or attempt to critically understand - your own links.
What is it you are saying about people with Symbrachydactyly?
 
What is it you are saying about people with Symbrachydactyly?
That they have congenital deformity which appears in the population at a rate 2.5X higher than Swyers, and much higher rate than the SRY gene. Yet, there is no anti-science Symbrachydactyly ideological movement trying to convince us that normative fingers are objectively "anything but binary", and that people who acknowledge deformed or missing digits as abnormal, are Symbrachydactylyphobic.

And at least as of yet, there is no Democrat-based, politically-ideological group denying simple biology, trying to enlarge the Symbrachydactyly base by mind-screwing children with thoughts they may have been unnaturally born into the wrong, normative body. With Joe Camel-like rainbow colors, sparkles, and Symbrachydactyly Story Hour promo campaigns to have them think about surgically webbing, shortening, deforming, or removing their fingers to match their psychological finger orientation.

I mean, that would be really crazy, eh?

What were you hoping I was saying?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
Only the best of people.

Another Gold Medal take.

You must be really conflicted between tearing down all those Democrats having to share Capitol space with Trump, and Democrats who share legislative and ideological space with openly socialist Democrats - who, like Islamists whose Quran tells them being deceitful is religious law - falsely swear to uphold a Constitution they ideologically oppose, and detest.

Such a conundrum for a person of deeply-held American sensibilities, eh?
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88 and dovervolz
That they have congenital deformity which appears in the population at a rate 2.5X higher than Swyers, and much higher rate than the SRY gene. Yet, there is no anti-science Symbrachydactyly ideological movement trying to convince us that normative fingers are objectively "anything but binary", and that people who acknowledge deformed or missing digits as abnormal, are Symbrachydactylyphobic.

And at least as of yet, there is no Democrat-based, politically-ideological group denying simple biology, trying to enlarge the Symbrachydactyly base by mind-screwing children with thoughts they may have been unnaturally born into the wrong, normative body. With Joe Camel-like rainbow colors, sparkles, and Symbrachydactyly Story Hour promo campaigns to have them think about surgically webbing, shortening, deforming, or removing their fingers to match their psychological finger orientation.

I mean, that would be really crazy, eh?

What were you hoping I was saying?
What???????????????
I think people accept them as 100% normal.

You are actually proving the exact opposite of what you think.

It's kind of funny
 
What???????????????
I think people accept them as 100% normal.

You are actually proving the exact opposite of what you think.

It's kind of funny
It's "funny" because you either aren't following the conversation, or can't.

Of course people treat them well, that's being decent. And we find ways to help them live better - whether prosthetic or surgical TREATMENT - in a NORMAL world because we're overwhelmingly decent.

Because we're decent, though some of you have forgotten how, we should TREAT the genuinely dysphoric with mental counsel and therapy. At the point they're a responsible adult, they can chop or medicate their parts into oblivion. But even then, the SCIENCE states they likely become increasingly dysphoric and mentally ill following this path.

A DECENT people would advise them of this and state the obvious; "Bill, you will never be Betsy. And deep inside, you know this better than anyone. If you want to dress. and assume the countenance of womanhood with this in mind, you will have a better chance for some peace in your life, rather than radical procedures, which can only mimic womanhood in no more meaningful manner than a wig and tube of lipstick."

That would be the decent thing to do.
 
You're a sober contributor.
What do you want him to say about Medi and SS at this point?
To be fair, it is just more kicking the can down the road. Regardless, it's better off saying nothing at the moment until there's an actual plan that has the potential to get legitimate traction. Even then, it should come from whomever Trump's representative might be for those programs, let congress work it out and let Trump just stick to some very short cliff notes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NCFisher
It's "funny" because you either aren't following the conversation, or can't.

Of course people treat them well, that's being decent. And we find ways to help them live better - whether prosthetic or surgical TREATMENT - in a NORMAL world because we're overwhelmingly decent.

Because we're decent, though some of you have forgotten how, we should TREAT the genuinely dysphoric with mental counsel and therapy. At the point they're a responsible adult, they can chop or medicate their parts into oblivion. But even then, the SCIENCE states they likely become increasingly dysphoric and mentally ill following this path.

A DECENT people would advise them of this and state the obvious; "Bill, you will never be Betsy. And deep inside, you know this better than anyone. If you want to dress. and assume the countenance of womanhood with this in mind, you will have a better chance for some peace in your life, rather than radical procedures, which can only mimic womanhood in no more meaningful manner than a wig and tube of lipstick."

That would be the decent thing to do.

Now luther will think gloves represent oppression.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NCFisher
To be fair, it is just more kicking the can down the road. Regardless, it's better off saying nothing at the moment until there's an actual plan that has the potential to get legitimate traction. Even then, it should come from whomever Trump's representative might be for those programs, let congress work it out and let Trump just stick to some very short cliff notes.
That's my point; build understanding of how reducing the size of federal gov and the tax burden - which I hope includes displacing the income tax with a sales tax - results in fewer tax dollars sent to DC, more $ in taxpayer pockets to plan for their financial future. Aside from waste and abuse, I really don't expect anything on Medi/SS at this time, six weeks in. My preference is to, within 6 months, begin discussing market pay scales for Fed employees and let them fund their own retirements as everyone else does, and eliminating Fed pensions; unfunded obligations dwarf the $38T debt. Set the example for states to follow.

This is literally an educational process, bolstered by action to actually reduce DC. I don't expect any 'plan' re: Medi/SS for at least a year.
 

VN Store



Back
Top