President Joe Biden - Kamala Harris Administration

#25,455
#25,455
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#25,458
#25,458
Franklin Pierce said:
The $10 billion Pork fattening Congress' $1.5 Trillion spending bill: $3 million for a Gandhi museum in Texas, $1.6 Million for Rhode Island shellfish 'equity', $800,000 for Artist Lofts in California and Schumer's $600,000 Greenhouse

The $10 billion Pork fattening Congress' $1.5trillion spending bill | Daily Mail Online
Click to expand...

Good!

I always hated TX didn't memorialize a Brahmic lawyer pervert who poverty-appropriated the low castes, while ensuring the Dalits were kept low and Brahmans atop, and proffered the Jews should have offered Nazis their necks.

"There's no mythness like show mythness!..."
 
  • Like
Reactions: ButchPlz, EasternVol, AM64 and 1 other person
#25,459
#25,459
NCFisher said:
Good!

I always hated TX didn't memorialize a Brahmic lawyer pervert who poverty-appropriated the low castes, while ensuring the Dalits were kept low and Brahmans atop, and proffered the Jews should have offered Nazis their necks.

"There's no mythness like show mythness!..."
Click to expand...

The American experiment has failed. No doubt. It is to the point taxpayers, hence voters, are irrelevant The Bridge to Nowhere was prophetic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NurseGoodVol, NCFisher, SpaceCoastVol and 1 other person
#25,461
#25,461
Vol423 said:
The reason that U.S. shale producers aren't already producing more is that they know that whenever their increased production is no longer politically convenient for the idiot-in-chief, he will pull the rug out from under them again. You can't make multiple year investments when you're dealing with an administration that is openly hostile to your very existence.
Click to expand...

Even a Democratic governor is echoing my sentiments.

Democratic governor warns against 'echoing Socialist Party lines' and forcing Big Oil to drill
 
  • Like
Reactions: NCFisher and AM64
#25,462
#25,462
Franklin Pierce said:
BREAKING: Biden REVERSES Trump's expanded 'expedited removal' which meant any migrant in the US under two years could be immediately deported - while fears grow of massive border influx when COVID restrictions end

The Biden administration on Friday reversed a Trump-era expansion of 'expedited removal,' whereby some illegal immigrants can be rapidly deported without an appearance before a judge.

The July 23, 2019 rule targeted immigrants across the nation who could not prove they had been in the U.S. continuously for two years or more. Prior to the rule's expansion, the 2004 expedited removal policy only applied to a 100-mile zone from the border, to those who had arrived by sea or to those who had been in the U.S. 14 days or fewer.

In announcing the reversal of the expansion, a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) withdrawal notice said that the Trump-era rule had been used so infrequently due to 'operational complexities and limited utility. The notice said that more aggressive use of the rule could subject Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to more legal challenges.

Biden REVERSES Trump's expanded 'expedited removal' deportation | Daily Mail Online
Click to expand...
We now see the additional reason (other than sending immigrants to red states) that the Biden Administration has been flying illegals across the nation. They’re getting them well more than 100 miles from the border. Then they revert to the 100 mile rule.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NCFisher and AM64
#25,463
#25,463
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#25,464
#25,464
NCFisher said:
Good!

I always hated TX didn't memorialize a Brahmic lawyer pervert who poverty-appropriated the low castes, while ensuring the Dalits were kept low and Brahmans atop, and proffered the Jews should have offered Nazis their necks.

"There's no mythness like show mythness!..."
Click to expand...

No clue what you just said other than “I always hated TX”. On this we agree.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RavinDave and AM64
#25,465
#25,465
Franklin Pierce said:
The $10 billion Pork fattening Congress' $1.5 Trillion spending bill: $3 million for a Gandhi museum in Texas, $1.6 Million for Rhode Island shellfish 'equity', $800,000 for Artist Lofts in California and Schumer's $600,000 Greenhouse

The $10 billion Pork fattening Congress' $1.5trillion spending bill | Daily Mail Online
Click to expand...

A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world's greatest civilizations has been 200 years. - Alexander Tytler
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: NCFisher and AM64
#25,466
#25,466
whodeycin85 said:
Right. Isn't it already illegal to do such....in public posting is legal in private its not...blackmail had always been illegal unless your a Democrat
Click to expand...

It's a lot like their new lynching law. That would presumably be covered under murder ... and automatically with "hate crime" attached. Dems buying voters stupid enough not to see through it. Another frivolous new law to buy emotional votes. The really sad part is that allegedly 81M people of voting age in this country are stupid enough to buy what they are selling.

On the other hand members of congress may actually like a new law against extortion and blackmail that they can hide behind.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NurseGoodVol, Rickyvol77, SpaceCoastVol and 3 others
#25,467
#25,467
Vol423 said:
The reason that U.S. shale producers aren't already producing more is that they know that whenever their increased production is no longer politically convenient for the idiot-in-chief, he will pull the rug out from under them again. You can't make multiple year investments when you're dealing with an administration that is openly hostile to your very existence.
Click to expand...

Bump
 
#25,468
#25,468
volinbham said:
Isn't Ras expressing a diverse viewpoint? Why characterize it as "hate"? Why does expressing a diverse viewpoint make him the "bad guy"?
Click to expand...
Yeah he is expressing a diverse viewpoint, and I accept that those are his views and he has the right to speak them as loudly as he wants. To address your last two questions, I'm not the one calling for purging of people I disagree with politically "by any means necessary". That is why I characterized it that way.
 
#25,469
#25,469
AM64 said:
Apparently only some diverse viewpoints are acceptable. I've noticed for a long time that the left for all their "humanity" are really a very unaccepting and unforgiving bunch if you don't accept their party line. While they paint others as nazis, the left are the real totalitarians of the world.
Click to expand...
That is not what I said at all. I never said he should be silenced for voicing his opinion. I've never once said someone I disagree with politically should be silenced. I disagree with posters here on several issues, but I still accept and understand their viewpoint on things.

And you do have a good point about the actual left (liberals are not this same left btw). Go hang out in hard left spaces on social media sometime. It is a wild ride of autocracy, anti-Semitism, and homophobia. They went so far left they looped back around.
 
#25,473
#25,473
Precisely why we had rules for who was allowed to vote and the system was set up where there was really only one "democratically" elected office in the federal government to start. Democratizing the federal government and allowing more and more people to vote was a mistake, and always has been historically.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT, DC_Vol, hog88 and 1 other person
#25,474
#25,474
ButchPlz said:
Precisely why we had rules for who was allowed to vote and the system was set up where there was really only one "democratically" elected office in the federal government to start. Democratizing the federal government and allowing more and more people to vote was a mistake, and always has been historically.
Click to expand...

Brings up an interesting topic..If you cannot have taxation without representation, should we have representation without taxation?

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/18/61p...come-taxes-in-2020-tax-policy-center-says.htm
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDad and AM64
#25,475
#25,475
  • Like
Reactions: midnight orange, McDad and AM64
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top