President Joe Biden - Kamala Harris Administration

Did you hear his Congressional testimony? They were talking about that Misinformation appointment and this POS denied he had even heard of the pee tape or Hunter's laptop, two issues apparently the witch had commented on Twitter in past.

He's really a sad & pathetic example of a human being. He's Satan in the flesh.
Every time I see him, I think what a waste that he's even still breathing our air.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
He paid for Joe's stuff out of money he was given due to Joe's position...is called money laundering...basically is a shell company cleaning money for Joe...problem is he is a POS crackhead and F*ckup....so he left evidence

You're trying to explain to one of the board's worst posters. Good luck.
 
So no that isn’t it at all. While yes we should have at least strategic production on shore I really don’t care where my mulch comes from or where the cheap injection molded plastic toys I buy my nieces and nephews come from. But if I were to pick I’d at least like to keep it in hemisphere and foster more border trade.
What about your beef?

 
What about your beef?


The food supply could be considered strategic sure. However it’s also a global commodity especially meat. One thing that’s always amazed me like meat is the shelf life after butchering. You have quite a few options on grains. Not so much on any meat without deep freezing. But we already have a lot of pork coming from offshore believe. I have no idea of beef but I can say I haven’t had a decent steak outside of North America. South America has a pretty good reputation also. But European beef just sucks.
 
The food supply could be considered strategic sure. However it’s also a global commodity especially meat. One thing that’s always amazed me like meat is the shelf life after butchering. You have quite a few options on grains. Not so much on any meat without deep freezing. But we already have a lot of pork coming from offshore believe. I have no idea of beef but I can say I haven’t had a decent steak outside of North America. South America has a pretty good reputation also. But European beef just sucks.
Part of that reliance on foreign beef is the fact that foreign beef costs a little bit cheaper (as that video mentions) before processing. After it is brought here and processed, then the costs are similar to or cheaper than US raised beef. Either we should place tariffs on that beef or limit the importation of that beef and pay a fair price here for American beef.
 
Clean-up Crews take us inside gruesome Murder and Suicide Scenes

The crime was attempted murder. After a Long Long Island man allegedly stabbed his wife then tried to kill himself, their home resembled the aftermath of a horror film.

“Blood was everywhere,” Victoria Vallone, operations director with Bio Recovery, a New York-based company that cleans up death scenes, told The Post. “When people survive an attempted murder, they run all around the house.”

With murders and suicides surging in the United States — homicides rose a record-setting 30 percent in 2020 and have not abated — clean-up posses are busy.

Spaulding-Decon-cleaning-crew-11.jpg

Crews clean up blood, bone fragments and odors in the aftermath of grisly deaths.

WARNING GRAPHIC CONTENT:
Clean-up crews take us inside gruesome murder and suicide scenes
You suggesting we hire them after Dems get trounced in midterms?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
REVEALED: Biden's new disinformation czar shared misleading tweets about Covid masks, claimed Trump presidency would 'embolden ISIS' and praised British spy behind the debunked Russian dossier- but she STILL hasn't apologized

  • Nina Jankowicz, 33, has been appointed executive director of the Department of Homeland Security's Disinformation Governance Board
Biden's pick to combat disinformation online has spread her fair share of false information in tweets about masks and former President Donald Trump - and has even expressed her support for the former British spy behind the Russian dossier.

On Wednesday, officials announced that Nina Jankowicz, 33, will head the Department of Homeland Security's Disinformation Governance Board as executive director.

Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas did not disclose any powers that would be granted to the dystopian-sounding board while addressing lawmakers on Wednesday.

He explained that the board would work to tackle disinformation ahead of the November midterms, particularly in Hispanic communities.

But Mayorkas did say that the new board would come under the Biden-era Center for Prevention Programs and Partnerships (CP3), meaning it would have no powers to crack down on disinformation and will instead try to combat it by throwing money at what it sees as problems.

Since then, though, observant conservatives have discovered that Jankowicz, a Wilson Center global fellow, previously published information that was later found to be false or misleading.

57239249-10770479-image-a-3_1651327683024.jpg

Jankowicz has been appointed by the Biden administration to head the Department of Homeland Security's Disinformation Governance Board as executive director

In one instance, back when the global pandemic was just beginning, Jankowicz quote tweeted a post from Rob Leathern, who worked on integrity products at Facebook and announced that the company was giving the World Health Organization and other health groups as many free ads as needed to tackle the worldwide COVID-19 response.

Jankowicz also wrote at the time that 'our country might be too... um, free spirited? to comply with social distancing recommendations unless they're forced upon us.

'So force away! Lock us down. People are not taking this seriously,' she wrote after apparently being within six feet of a high school-aged couple.

Jankowicz also claimed online ahead of the 2016 presidential election that a Donald Trump presidency would 'embolden ISIS,' when in reality, the Islamic State collapsed under the Trump administration, which also carried out the successful operation to kill head Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.

She has also said in February that Russia's invasion of Ukraine 'would have been so much worse under the former president,' apparently reiterating his alleged ties to the country.

And in an August 2020 tweet, Jankowicz apparently hyped up former British spy Chris Steele as he spoke about disinformation. She wrote at the time that she listened to a podcast featuring Steele, saying he 'provides some great historical context about the evolution of disinfo.

57209793-10770479-The_head_of_the_Biden_administration_s_new_Disinformation_Govern-a-7_1651327089579.jpg

The head of the Biden administration's new 'Disinformation Governance Board' Nina Jankowicz sings about 'misinformation' to the tune of Mary Poppins song 'Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious'

Jankowicz has also found herself under fire for some of her controversial videos, including one from December 2015 in which she says: 'I don't want to work, struggle or compromise.'

In the video, she asks Santa, 'if you're listening please tell me what to do. Who do I f*** to be famous,' adding: 'I've done everything I could and now the rest is up to you.'

Biden's new disinformation czar has still not removed or apologized for tweets about masks and Trump | Daily Mail Online
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst
Part of that reliance on foreign beef is the fact that foreign beef costs a little bit cheaper (as that video mentions) before processing. After it is brought here and processed, then the costs are similar to or cheaper than US raised beef. Either we should place tariffs on that beef or limit the importation of that beef and pay a fair price here for American beef.

Doesn't sound USDA approved to me other than the stamp. But USDA approved is like....uhhh not much I suspect as a gov agency.. We look to be doing ok anyways, atp.

Ranking Of Countries That Produce The Most Beef (USDA)

Screen Shot 2022-04-30 at 4.24.25 PM.png

Who knew there was a beef live.com site...other than McDad? Lord knows what popups I get now
 
REVEALED: Biden's new disinformation czar shared misleading tweets about Covid masks, claimed Trump presidency would 'embolden ISIS' and praised British spy behind the debunked Russian dossier- but she STILL hasn't apologized

  • Nina Jankowicz, 33, has been appointed executive director of the Department of Homeland Security's Disinformation Governance Board
Biden's pick to combat disinformation online has spread her fair share of false information in tweets about masks and former President Donald Trump - and has even expressed her support for the former British spy behind the Russian dossier.

On Wednesday, officials announced that Nina Jankowicz, 33, will head the Department of Homeland Security's Disinformation Governance Board as executive director.

Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas did not disclose any powers that would be granted to the dystopian-sounding board while addressing lawmakers on Wednesday.

He explained that the board would work to tackle disinformation ahead of the November midterms, particularly in Hispanic communities.

But Mayorkas did say that the new board would come under the Biden-era Center for Prevention Programs and Partnerships (CP3), meaning it would have no powers to crack down on disinformation and will instead try to combat it by throwing money at what it sees as problems.

Since then, though, observant conservatives have discovered that Jankowicz, a Wilson Center global fellow, previously published information that was later found to be false or misleading.

57239249-10770479-image-a-3_1651327683024.jpg

Jankowicz has been appointed by the Biden administration to head the Department of Homeland Security's Disinformation Governance Board as executive director

In one instance, back when the global pandemic was just beginning, Jankowicz quote tweeted a post from Rob Leathern, who worked on integrity products at Facebook and announced that the company was giving the World Health Organization and other health groups as many free ads as needed to tackle the worldwide COVID-19 response.

Jankowicz also wrote at the time that 'our country might be too... um, free spirited? to comply with social distancing recommendations unless they're forced upon us.

'So force away! Lock us down. People are not taking this seriously,' she wrote after apparently being within six feet of a high school-aged couple.

Jankowicz also claimed online ahead of the 2016 presidential election that a Donald Trump presidency would 'embolden ISIS,' when in reality, the Islamic State collapsed under the Trump administration, which also carried out the successful operation to kill head Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.

She has also said in February that Russia's invasion of Ukraine 'would have been so much worse under the former president,' apparently reiterating his alleged ties to the country.

And in an August 2020 tweet, Jankowicz apparently hyped up former British spy Chris Steele as he spoke about disinformation. She wrote at the time that she listened to a podcast featuring Steele, saying he 'provides some great historical context about the evolution of disinfo.

57209793-10770479-The_head_of_the_Biden_administration_s_new_Disinformation_Govern-a-7_1651327089579.jpg

The head of the Biden administration's new 'Disinformation Governance Board' Nina Jankowicz sings about 'misinformation' to the tune of Mary Poppins song 'Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious'

Jankowicz has also found herself under fire for some of her controversial videos, including one from December 2015 in which she says: 'I don't want to work, struggle or compromise.'

In the video, she asks Santa, 'if you're listening please tell me what to do. Who do I f*** to be famous,' adding: 'I've done everything I could and now the rest is up to you.'

Biden's new disinformation czar has still not removed or apologized for tweets about masks and Trump | Daily Mail Online
Don't trust women with clefts in their chin...
 
Doesn't sound USDA approved to me other than the stamp. But USDA approved is like....uhhh not much I suspect as a gov agency.. We look to be doing ok anyways, atp.

Ranking Of Countries That Produce The Most Beef (USDA)

View attachment 451611

Who knew there was a beef live.com site...other than McDad? Lord knows what popups I get now

It appears that we should be able to have enough production to not need imports at all if we were really serious about it. Instead of exporting, we should focus on satisfying our own markets here at home and pay a fair price for that beef in order to make it commercially viable.

National Beef Wire | U.S. Beef Imports vs. Exports By Year

7648f86a.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
I agree. I have not looked up production vs consumption
This has been my entire argument the whole time. We have the capability to be self-sufficient in many areas and not need to be concerned about all of these other regional conflicts or having to insert ourselves into these conflicts. All we have to do is focus on us. Now I'm not saying that we can be import free, because there will be imports that we need. But this destructive strategy that we have carried out in this country over the last 40 years has only left us vulnerable to where we have to be concerned about shipping lanes in places half way around the globe or regional conflicts that have nothing to do with us.
 
Part of that reliance on foreign beef is the fact that foreign beef costs a little bit cheaper (as that video mentions) before processing. After it is brought here and processed, then the costs are similar to or cheaper than US raised beef. Either we should place tariffs on that beef or limit the importation of that beef and pay a fair price here for American beef.
I’m actually not that worried about beef. The North American palette on beef is a big discriminator I think. And in the link you provided they referenced South American beef. Many people think Argentine beef is as good as US beef. I would think pork is a meat supply more exposed. Chicken appears to have corrected and is largely being sourced here again now.
 
I’m actually not that worried about beef. The North American palette on beef is a big discriminator I think. And in the link you provided they referenced South American beef. Many people think Argentine beef is as good as US beef. I would think pork is a meat supply more exposed. Chicken appears to have corrected and is largely being sourced here again now.
I don't have an issue with Argentine or Brazilian beef. That isn't the point to take away from what I'm saying. I'm saying that there is no reason for the US to be depending, in general, on most of the beef products that we have. Even 11% in my mind and under the conditions we are in is too much. We need to be focusing on first maintaining our own domestic needs and paying the domestic producers a fair price without undercutting their efforts with imports. You said it yourself, food is a national security concern... so treat it as such. If you are willing to pay the MIC top dollar for weapons, then we need to be able to do the same for ranchers and farmers that put food on our plates. or else, they will have no incentive to continue doing what they do and we are left relying on food exports.
 
I’m actually not that worried about beef. The North American palette on beef is a big discriminator I think. And in the link you provided they referenced South American beef. Many people think Argentine beef is as good as US beef. I would think pork is a meat supply more exposed. Chicken appears to have corrected and is largely being sourced here again now.

I would be curious to know if we went totally ballistic on self preservation, what exactly we would lack?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
I don't have an issue with Argentine or Brazilian beef. That isn't the point to take away from what I'm saying. I'm saying that there is no reason for the US to be depending, in general, on most of the beef products that we have. Even 11% in my mind and under the conditions we are in is too much. We need to be focusing on first maintaining our own domestic needs and paying the domestic producers a fair price without undercutting their efforts with imports. You said it yourself, food is a national security concern... so treat it as such. If you are willing to pay the MIC top dollar for weapons, then we need to be able to do the same for ranchers and farmers that put food on our plates. or else, they will have no incentive to continue doing what they do and we are left relying on food exports.
So you probably need to understand what the breakdown of those imports are. If it’s stuff like Kobe or Waygu then it’s gonna come from where it’s produced. If it’s just regular f production beef then you might have a gripe. Again I’d think pork is a bigger concern. As the data provided has shown American beef is still king and due to our palette likely will be for a long time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
The food supply could be considered strategic sure. However it’s also a global commodity especially meat. One thing that’s always amazed me like meat is the shelf life after butchering. You have quite a few options on grains. Not so much on any meat without deep freezing. But we already have a lot of pork coming from offshore believe. I have no idea of beef but I can say I haven’t had a decent steak outside of North America. South America has a pretty good reputation also. But European beef just sucks.
Peru's national dish seems to be beef with peppers and onions, and everyone I ever had their was pretty damn good. I always tried to favor the local dish when I visited another country, and I've found that to be a good recipe for delicious food.
 
For meat my guess is we’d be short pork. I think we’re fine on beef and poultry.

No sir..I was talking everything strategic. We are a wonderfully blessed nation of all sorts at the resources level. What would we significantly lack if we put those resources to use?
IMO Pax Americana has been an export of our nation's ability to support Pax Americana by spreading wealth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64

VN Store



Back
Top