Let’s apply that same standard everywhere.Just say the Capitol riots were bad without bringing up something else. You can do it. Ask me separately about summer 2020. I'll say it was awful without bringing up something else. We don't have to have **** measuring contest for who's worst.
The problem is where do you start.Me too and thats fine, but I'm not sure why some have to bring up something else all the time. If you don't like something, just say it, no need to conflate it with something else other than to minimize it.
I'm perfectly fine with consistency and I don't have a problem saying the BLM riots were not okay and anybody causing injury to people or property should be prosecuted. The problem I've had is when I say the Capitol rioters and their supporters/apologists are right-wing fringe (which some have said doesn't exist) I get responses of "but the 2020 riots."The problem is where do you start.
It’s whataboutism to bring up the riots when someone talks about January 6th. However if you called the riots mostly peaceful protests then you have no standing on January 6th.
Consistency would be anyone breaking the law should be punished and anyone throwing things like bricks at law enforcement should be met with deadly force.
My view that the lady killed on January 6th died because she was trying to break through a barricaded door and caused her own death was very unpopular. But it’s consistent with my view that people throwing bricks at cops in Chicago should have also been shot.
Report: Jon Gruden Called Joe Biden ‘Nervous Clueless P*ssy’ in Controversial Emails
Jon Gruden, who recently resigned from his position as head coach of the Las Vegas Raiders after the revelation of emails using racial and misogynistic language, once called Joe Biden a “nervous clueless p*ssy.”
Report: Jon Gruden Called Joe Biden 'Nervous Clueless P*ssy' in Controversial Emails
My God, its almost like we are bribing them not to use the weapons we allowed to fall in their hands against us.........Taliban say US has agreed to provide AID to Afghanistan during talks in Doha
The U.S. has agreed to provide humanitarian aid to a desperately poor Afghanistan on the brink of an economic disaster, while refusing to give political recognition to the country's new Taliban rulers, the Taliban said Sunday.
The statement came at the end of the first direct talks between the former foes since the chaotic withdrawal of U.S. troops at the end of August.
There was no immediate comment from the U.S. on the weekend meeting.
Taliban says US will provide humanitarian aid to Afghanistan | Daily Mail Online
The problem is there are many who don’t think the riots were a problem but harp on January 6th.I'm perfectly fine with consistency and I don't have a problem saying the BLM riots were not okay and anybody causing injury to people or property should be prosecuted. The problem I've had is when I say the Capitol rioters and their supporters/apologists are right-wing fringe (which some have said doesn't exist) I get responses of "but the 2020 riots."
That's a bit misleading because Trump was always right at 43 %, give or take 2 points. That was his ceiling because only a combination of the cult and diehard GOPers (i.e. never a Dem) would vote for or support him.
Biden has at least some cross over possibilities with more moderate GOPers. Not that they'd ever vote for him, or just not vote for Trump. But in terms of approval Biden could manage at least some anonymous, "meh, he's not so bad" nods.
That's a bit misleading because Trump was always right at 43 %, give or take 2 points. That was his ceiling because only a combination of the cult and diehard GOPers (i.e. never a Dem) would vote for or support him.
Biden has at least some cross over possibilities with more moderate GOPers. Not that they'd ever vote for him, or just not vote for Trump. But in terms of approval Biden could manage at least some anonymous, "meh, he's not so bad" nods.