Proof of the election fraud

My comments.

Vaccine deaths:

Great point. I find it very interesting that you would say that about deaths caused by vaccines. I guess we can apply the exact same logic to COVID deaths in general. Many that got counted in the COVID death roll didn't die from COVID afterall, they just died WITH COVID. Can't have your cake and eat it too I suppose.

Ineffectiveness of cloth masks: My appologies, yes it wasn't someone from the CDC using those exact words, it was another highly respected physician. My original argument was correct though, a fact you can't deny. Cloths masks don't work. It was never a conspiracy theory that they were ineffective. We have also known this for over 30 years. Only the very gullible believed they worked against viruses and bought the governments lies. The last study actually gives us some real numbers as to the effectiveness of cloth masks. Surgical masks (same as a cloth mask) only stopped 10 percent of exhaled droplets. However the K95/N95 mask did indeed stop 50 percent of exhaled droplets. Better than nothing I guess!

" Another study from Brown University did not find a correlation between mask mandates and student infections."
Cloth face masks 'lousy' as protection against COVID-19, other viruses, warns study
Study supports widespread use of better masks to curb COVID-19 indoors | Waterloo News

Kids and masking:

Not just on infants. It was monitored throughout early childhood.

"Thirty-nine children born in 2018 and 2019 were analyzed over the course of the pandemic, into 2021."
"The report found that there was a 23 per cent drop in scores measuring kids’ intelligence quotients since the start of the pandemic"

Never, ever mask kids.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne
  • Like
Reactions: norrislakevol
You must have missed my earlier posts. I'm not going back through and doing it all over again, but here is one:

ALARMING Study: COVID Regulations, Masking May be DRASTICALLY Lowering Kids’ IQs - The New American
You (and that far-right publication- The New American) have misrepresented the Brown study. It does not say that masks and masks alone are responsible for significantly lower IQ's. Masks are simply one of several possible influential factors to consider since the pandemic began.
 
You (and that far-right publication- The New American) have misrepresented the Brown study. It does not say that masks and masks alone are responsible for significantly lower IQ's. Masks are simply one of several possible influential factors to consider since the pandemic began.

Not possible, they are a factor. Young children need facial recognition to learn, that includes the harm that adults wearing masks around them have caused.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne
Vaccine deaths:

Great point. I find it very interesting that you would say that about deaths caused by vaccines. I guess we can apply the exact same logic to COVID deaths in general. Many that got counted in the COVID death roll didn't die from COVID afterall, they just died WITH COVID. Can't have your cake and eat it too I suppose.

Ineffectiveness of cloth masks: My appologies, yes it wasn't someone from the CDC using those exact words, it was another highly respected physician. My original argument was correct though, a fact you can't deny. Cloths masks don't work. It was never a conspiracy theory that they were ineffective. We have also known this for over 30 years. Only the very gullible believed they worked against viruses and bought the governments lies. The last study actually gives us some real numbers as to the effectiveness of cloth masks. Surgical masks (same as a cloth mask) only stopped 10 percent of exhaled droplets. However the K95/N95 mask did indeed stop 50 percent of exhaled droplets. Better than nothing I guess!

" Another study from Brown University did not find a correlation between mask mandates and student infections."
Cloth face masks 'lousy' as protection against COVID-19, other viruses, warns study
Study supports widespread use of better masks to curb COVID-19 indoors | Waterloo News

Kids and masking:

Not just on infants. It was monitored throughout early childhood.

"Thirty-nine children born in 2018 and 2019 were analyzed over the course of the pandemic, into 2021."
"The report found that there was a 23 per cent drop in scores measuring kids’ intelligence quotients since the start of the pandemic"

Never, ever mask kids.

I never said the same logic couldn’t be applied to Covid deaths in general. Stop trying to change your arguments when you’re caught dead to rights.

The CDC said cloth masks are not as effective but are better than no mask.

So again you exaggerate findings.

The quality of education fell thru the floor. The studies you cite were not masking studies. The kids you mention weren’t even wearing masks through some or all of the study period.

So, your conclusions are still exaggerated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RockyTop85
I never said the same logic couldn’t be applied to Covid deaths in general. Stop trying to change your arguments when you’re caught dead to rights.

I am absolutely NOT caught dead to rights. I personally know of TWO people that died from the jab. Both from a blood clot after taking it. On top of this, the 1200 deaths I talked about from the jab were from the phizer vaccine. Let's throw the others in there and see what we get.

The CDC said cloth masks are not as effective but are better than no mask.

Did you read the study from Waterloo? 10 percent stoppage of exhaled droplets. That renders them effectively worthless. Stop trying to deny study after study that points to the same. You are denying the truth. The CDC had no data that these would work when they recommended them and all data during the pandemic shows masks don't slow the spread of COVID. How about using actual facts. though this seems hard for you to do. Check out the University of Louisville mask study.

Study Finds Face Masks Didn’t Slow Spread Of Covid-19 | The Daily Wire

“Our findings do not support the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 transmission rates decrease with greater public mask use,”

So, the fact that cloth masks do not slow the spread of COVID shows that when this fact was argued early on by many and pointed to as a conspiracy theory by some talking heads, it turns out the talking heads were wrong, just like you are.

So again you exaggerate findings.

The quality of education fell thru the floor. The studies you cite were not masking studies. The kids you mention weren’t even wearing masks through some or all of the study period.

So, your conclusions are still exaggerated.

Get real. You're grasping here. Masks are terrible for kids and only dumb people would argue otherwise. On top of that, those teaching young children shouldn't wear masks because it damages their ability to learn. Is that so hard to understand that masks are lowered learning ability of children and therefore IQ's? It doesn't take a genius to figure that out.

Also from the Louisville mask study:

"By obscuring nonverbal communication, masks interfere with social learning in children."
 
Exactly.


Indeed.

Check out the Waterloo mask study. Cloth masks only stop 10 percent of exhaled droplets rendering them effectively useless. That's ok though. Keep denying science and believing that cloth face diapers protect people.


@norrislakevol .... ^^^^ Totally. ^^^^ Get real, man. LOL.


Nope!!

From the Louisville mask study, look it up.

"By obscuring nonverbal communication, masks interfere with social learning in children."
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne
Get real. You're grasping here. Masks are terrible for kids and only dumb people would argue otherwise. On top of that, those teaching young children shouldn't wear masks because it damages their ability to learn. Is that so hard to understand that masks are lowered learning ability of children and therefore IQ's? It doesn't take a genius to figure that out.

Also from the Louisville mask study:

"By obscuring nonverbal communication, masks interfere with social learning in children."

So now we are all into your opinions and feelz? I thought we were discussing scientific peer reviewed studies. Jeez, you really suck at this. You get cornered and your position morphs into something else.

Your original proposition was supposedly based in science and now that every single argument has been broken down you start lashing out with the dumb comments. It's cute.
 
LOL. I was there too. LOL. And you are dead wrong about this.

Five Thirty Eight and 270 to win, both had Biden the whole way. I posted their projections to this forum all throughout 2020. You simply don't know what in the hell you are talking about.
I’m 95% sure you were on here whining about never trusting polls again in Election Day.
 
I’m 95% sure you were on here whining about never trusting polls again in Election Day.
That is correct, after the election, but it has nothing to do with my reply to @Gandalf who claimed that Democrats were ready to jump off a bridge because they expected Trump to win decisively, just a few weeks before the election.

There was never a point where I thought Trump would be re-elected. I think it's safe to say that most Democrats were equally confident in the weeks leading up to the election.

If anything, we were overconfident and expected Biden to win by a greater margin than he did.
 
This is a fun read. It proves voter fraud in Wisconsin and pointed out minor details about how nursing home voter turnout in several counties was 100%. I became acquainted with nursing homes when my father spent his last year in one and most of those people didn't know who was the president much less be able to make a cognizant vote.

https://legis.wisconsin.gov/assembly/22/brandtjen/media/1552/osc-second-interim-report.pdf
Nobody is going to take the time to read all of that crap (136 pages) ... So please tell us the pages where voter fraud is proven, so people who aren't inclined to take your word for it, can make their own determination about what is or isn't being proven here.
 
Nobody is going to take the time to read all of that crap (136 pages) ... So please tell us the pages where voter fraud is proven, so people who aren't inclined to take your word for it, can make their own determination about what is or isn't being proven here.
Since you're lazy, start reading at page 81.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne
I just read from pages 81 through 85. There are allegations of voter fraud listed, involving invalid nursing home residents, but the allegations themselves don't serve as actual proof.
So don't believe it then. This was an official investigation by a state and they found evidence of voter fraud. Go suck Biden's dick and dance on Nancy Pelosi's head, I don't care. Read and accept or STFU.
 
So don't believe it then. This was an official investigation by a state and they found evidence of voter fraud. Go suck Biden's dick and dance on Nancy Pelosi's head, I don't care. Read and accept or STFU.
You said that voter fraud was proven, and it wasn't. These are just more politically partisan accusations. And grow up... that's totally uncalled for.
 
I just gave you proof of voter fraud in Wisconsin and you ignored it.


You are wasting your breath with him. He honestly believes the moron residing in the Whitehouse got 80 million votes. He also believes that masks don't affect a child's learning ability so it is really not all that surprising.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77

VN Store



Back
Top