Proof of the election fraud

[whodeycin85]

Once again, you are wrong. "The Great Recession" is considered by economists to have run between December of 2007 through June of 2009. Beyond it's duration, the Great Recession had significant impact on economic growth.

I posted a link. Argue with that...your exhausting on your never ending arguments to be right without citing anything...good luck

 

[BowlBrother85]

I posted a link. Argue with that...your exhausting on your never ending arguments to be right without citing anything...good luck

You have commented on topics you clearly don't understand. You have used the terms "debt" and "deficit" interchangeably, while discussing federal budgets and fiscal policy without accounting for the discrepancy between the calendar year and the fiscal calendar.

 

[whodeycin85]

You have commented on topics you clearly don't understand. You have used the terms "debt" and "deficit" interchangeably, while discussing federal budgets and fiscal policy without accounting for the discrepancy between the calendar year and the fiscal calendar.

While yes they may have been used incorrectly i clearly spoke to the link provided while you ignore it...much like a grammer nazi on a message board pointing out mistake instead of having a comeback to what was corrected


But thanks for playing

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

Rules for thee ... but NOT for Republicans when it comes to question the presidential election.

 

[BowlBrother85]

Obama contributed to 74% of the debt...Trump 33% Obama was right AFTER a recession and Trump was shut down for his last year..

You don't understand what those percentages represent. 74% and 33% mark the percentage increases of the debt during their respective years in office. Of course, Obama's will be higher because he began with a much lower number.

 

[Orangeburst]

You don't understand what those percentages represent. 74% and 33% mark the percentage increases of the debt during their respective years in office. Of course, Obama's will be higher because he began with a much lower number.

So you are anti-Luther? He said Reagan was the worst.

Which is better or least worse..$1T to $2T or $2T to $4T?

 

[whodeycin85]

You don't understand what those percentages represent. 74% and 33% mark the percentage increases of the debt during their respective years in office. Of course, Obama's will be higher because he began with a much lower number.

so at Obama time in office in which we werr recovering from a recession
..he added 74% to the national debt...in Trumps time he dealt with a pandemic and added 33%...so % wise Trump added less debt..period. spin away all you want...and Biden Ill bet will end up spending more.

 

[BowlBrother85]

so at Obama time in office in which we werr recovering from a recession
..he added 74% to the national debt...in Trumps time he dealt with a pandemic and added 33%...so % wise Trump added less debt..period. spin away all you want...and Biden Ill bet will end up spending more.

They added similar amounts to the debt: $8.33 Trillion from Obama and $7.62 Trillion from Trump. However, Obama served 8 years, while Trump only served 4. In terms of the percentage increases, Obama's will be higher because he preceded Trump, and therefore began his presidency with the lower starting value. That isn't spin... it's statistics.

Trump was a free-wheeling spender. There is no getting around that.

 

[whodeycin85]

They added similar amounts to the debt: $8.33 Trillion from Obama and $7.62 Trillion from Trump. However, Obama served 8 years, while Trump only served 4. In terms of the percentage increases, Obama's will be higher because he preceded Trump, and therefore began his presidency with the lower starting value. That isn't spin... it's statistics.

Trump was a free-wheeling spender. There is no getting around that.

Yes stats show Obama spent more akd so far Biden is on his way as well...and yes Trump spent alot as well...it stats and mine show exactly what saying...

 

[BowlBrother85]

Yes stats show Obama spent more akd so far Biden is on his way as well...and yes Trump spent alot as well...it stats and mine show exactly what saying...

... but you want to skirt the fact that Trump did his damage in half the time.

 

[whodeycin85]

... but you want to skirt the fact that Trump did his damage in half the time.

Im not but his damage was less them Obama and if Biden keeps going he will surpass Trump as well

 

[VolinWayne]

This isn't proof of election fraud but it is proof of money talking and probably the reason that so many politicians on both sides of the aisle are absolutely against full forensic audits and why almost nobody outside Dominions little circle is allowed to look inside the machines.


County Commissioners to award $2.7 Million to purchase Dominion voting machines from large political donor

 

[clarksvol00]

Looks like it would have gone better for the Kraken if the courts had actually ignored the affidavits. This has a good discussion on the reason the affidavits weren't the silver bullets people kept claiming.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/r...d.350905/gov.uscourts.mied.350905.172.0_3.pdf

 

[BreatheUT]

Wisconsin probe finds 2020 election riddled with nursing home voting fraud


100% turnout in some facilities
https://www.washingtontimes.com/multimedia/image/ap_election_2020_audits_wisconsin_75909jpg/


Intercepted ballots, forged signatures and questionably high voting rates plagued Wisconsin’s nursing homes and other long-term care facilities during the 2020 presidential election, a state-appointed investigator said.

In light of the findings, the investigator said, the ballots from those facilities should be audited.

The special counsel’s report was issued Tuesday after an examination of 2020 election integrity. It said Wisconsin officials ditched legal requirements for supervising nursing home ballots during the pandemic, encouraging widespread voter fraud.

The 136-page report includes eye-popping data of voter participation at dozens of nursing homes and residential care facilities in five Wisconsin counties. The report’s author is Michael Gableman, the lead investigator for the office of special counsel and a former state Supreme Court justice.

The results, Mr. Gableman said, showed “absurd results related to nursing home voting.”

The report examined 2020 voter participation at 91 nursing homes in Milwaukee, Racine, Dane, Kenosha and Brown counties and found that at least 95% of residents had voted. In Milwaukee, Racine and Dane counties, 100% of nursing home residents cast ballots in the presidential election.

https://amp-washingtontimes-com.cdn...sin-probe-finds-2020-election-riddled-nursin/

 

[BreatheUT]

Remember the old adage "Who stole the cookie from the cookie jar?"

I might not have proof you stole the cookies from the cookie jar but half of the cookies are missing and we're the only two that's been in the house.

 

[Carl Pickens]

Wisconsin probe finds 2020 election riddled with nursing home voting fraud


100% turnout in some facilities


Intercepted ballots, forged signatures and questionably high voting rates plagued Wisconsin’s nursing homes and other long-term care facilities during the 2020 presidential election, a state-appointed investigator said.

In light of the findings, the investigator said, the ballots from those facilities should be audited.

The special counsel’s report was issued Tuesday after an examination of 2020 election integrity. It said Wisconsin officials ditched legal requirements for supervising nursing home ballots during the pandemic, encouraging widespread voter fraud.

The 136-page report includes eye-popping data of voter participation at dozens of nursing homes and residential care facilities in five Wisconsin counties. The report’s author is Michael Gableman, the lead investigator for the office of special counsel and a former state Supreme Court justice.

The results, Mr. Gableman said, showed “absurd results related to nursing home voting.”

The report examined 2020 voter participation at 91 nursing homes in Milwaukee, Racine, Dane, Kenosha and Brown counties and found that at least 95% of residents had voted. In Milwaukee, Racine and Dane counties, 100% of nursing home residents cast ballots in the presidential election.

https://amp-washingtontimes-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/amp.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/mar/2/wisconsin-probe-finds-2020-election-riddled-nursin/?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQKKAFQArABIIACAw==#aoh=16464121284589&referrer=https://www.google.com&amp_tf=From %1$s&ampshare=https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/mar/2/wisconsin-probe-finds-2020-election-riddled-nursin/

Bowelbrother will be here shortly to refute

 

[BreatheUT]

Bowelbrother will be here shortly to refute

He'll just copy and paste most of it from his saved notes in Word.

 

[ClearwaterVol]

so at Obama time in office in which we werr recovering from a recession
..he added 74% to the national debt...in Trumps time he dealt with a pandemic and added 33%...so % wise Trump added less debt..period. spin away all you want...and Biden Ill bet will end up spending more.

In half the time?

 

[K-town Vol Fan]

My God yall need to move on. Were going on 3 years now.

 

[RollinVol]

My God yall need to move on. Were going on 3 years now.

Some people are on year 6

 

[hUTch2002]

Wisconsin probe finds 2020 election riddled with nursing home voting fraud


100% turnout in some facilities


Intercepted ballots, forged signatures and questionably high voting rates plagued Wisconsin’s nursing homes and other long-term care facilities during the 2020 presidential election, a state-appointed investigator said.

In light of the findings, the investigator said, the ballots from those facilities should be audited.

The special counsel’s report was issued Tuesday after an examination of 2020 election integrity. It said Wisconsin officials ditched legal requirements for supervising nursing home ballots during the pandemic, encouraging widespread voter fraud.

The 136-page report includes eye-popping data of voter participation at dozens of nursing homes and residential care facilities in five Wisconsin counties. The report’s author is Michael Gableman, the lead investigator for the office of special counsel and a former state Supreme Court justice.

The results, Mr. Gableman said, showed “absurd results related to nursing home voting.”

The report examined 2020 voter participation at 91 nursing homes in Milwaukee, Racine, Dane, Kenosha and Brown counties and found that at least 95% of residents had voted. In Milwaukee, Racine and Dane counties, 100% of nursing home residents cast ballots in the presidential election.

https://amp-washingtontimes-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/amp.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/mar/2/wisconsin-probe-finds-2020-election-riddled-nursin/?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQKKAFQArABIIACAw==#aoh=16464121284589&referrer=https://www.google.com&amp_tf=From %1$s&ampshare=https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/mar/2/wisconsin-probe-finds-2020-election-riddled-nursin/

The percentage turnout in a few states was insanely high.

 

[hUTch2002]

In half the time?

To me, aside from the whole Fauci thing, the worst thing Trump did during the pandemic was throw a ridiculous amount of money at everyone. And then he did it again. And then Biden did it. I mean, Congress obviously approved the money but both guys supported it. No one would’ve handled the situation perfectly, or probably even well, as it was a novel virus but the money thrown at it was just stupid and now we’re reaping what was sewn.

 

[Orangeburst]

The percentage turnout in a few states was insanely high.

Can you imagine ballot harvesting nursing homes? That is some sick perverted thirst for power to try and gain some edge.

 

[BreatheUT]

The percentage turnout in a few states was insanely high.

There's almost no way nursing homes can have 100% voter turnout even if they filled out absentee ballots.

 

[Vol423]

There's almost no way nursing homes can have 100% voter turnout even if they filled out absentee ballots.

I’d love to see the composite results of those ballots. There are a ton of nursing homes in AZ too. It’s a huge area for retirees.