Proof of the election fraud

#2,202
#2,202
BigOrangeMojo said:
You do know this 138K error was from a R clerk in a R county who far fingered an extra digit for Biden and the error was caught and changed almost immediately.

Only about the 20th time its been stated but you like to continue to peddle it as "fraud"...
Click to expand...
You do know you don't know what you think you know right? You know talking points, but as the evidence never actually was tried you only know what you have been told. Told by a media that is the most lying in history, and an administration taht was the most corrupt. And yet every single rally was empty for Biden before 2020 and yet he got 80 million votes. Do you actually believe that? Or are you too more interested in semantics and talking points than any actual truth? You continue ask people to iognore their eyes, experiences, and the missing 20 million voters in 2024.
 
#2,204
#2,204
Sgt_Nick_Fury said:
You do know you don't know what you think you know right? You know talking points, but as the evidence never actually was tried you only kn ow what you have been told. And yet every single rally was empy for Biden and yet he got 80 million. Do you actually believe that? Or are you too more interested in semantics and talking points than any actual truth?
Click to expand...

You posted a chart that was obvious BS. The R led county even said what they did and how they caught it. Instead of defending your blatant BS chatt, you went off on a tangent to try to deflect....
 
#2,205
#2,205
McDad said:
Is a sudden jump always suspicious or only under unique circumstances?
Click to expand...
Is a rhetorical question alway valid and genuine or sometimes used as a semantic argument when no logical retort is available? A good defense lawyer doesn't have to prove his client is innocent, he just has to sew seeds of doubt. A really good lawyer can gaslight a jury even when they all witnessed the crime. I'm still trying to understand whether your a good lawyer, or actually beleive the stuff you post. 4 am multiuple states counting stops, and votes appear in mass following with statisticaly unreasonable amount of votes completely at contrast with the percentages up until that point. In the state of Jawjaw a fake pipeleak happens GOP poll watchers are told there will be no counting and they go home, only for them to resumne the recount, with both video of people pulling out boxes of ballots from under tables, and vans showing up unloading boxes, once again with a miracle ration different then counted thus far. And you want to talk about historical anomolies, as if circumstances are not also rediculously suspicious to anyone not willingly ignorant.

I think you know it, and yet your semantics line continues....avoid the elephant in the room, and the empty rallies, and go with mathmatic possibilities and questions that would require a level of research really better done in the courts. You know if cases were actually heard instead of summarily dismissed.
 
Last edited:
#2,206
#2,206
Sgt_Nick_Fury said:
Is a rhetorical question alway valid and genuine or sometimes used as a semantic argument when no logical retort is available? A good defense lawyer doesn't have to prove his client is innocent, he just has to sew seeds of doubt. A really good lawyer can gaslight a jury even when they all witnessed the crime. I'm still trying to understand whether your a good lawyer, or actually beleive the stuff you post.
Click to expand...
I'd rather you call me the worst insult imaginable than call.me a lawyer...even metaphorically.

I'm asking questions trying to decide something unknown. In my business, getting as much factual data as possible...whether I agree or not...is imperative for success.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hUTch2002
#2,207
#2,207
Sgt_Nick_Fury said:
Are you just being facetious as usual? Or do you actually beleive any of this is comparable? Trying to decide if you're a brilliant devil's advocate just much better at the game then Evillawyer, or an honest midwit for the record, who is deeply comitted to ignoring what everyone saw before their eyes at 4am in 2020, and when teh so called pipe burst in jawjaw.

View attachment 697600

View attachment 697601

View attachment 697602
Click to expand...

The bottom chart was before they counted over 15M (mostly D votes in Cali). Yeah, way to compare full results in prior years to one missing a state with 50 million people.

More people voted in battleground states in 2024 than 2020 (Kamala got pretty much the same number as Biden in the battlegrounds).

The 7MM reduction in Kamala's votes (compared to 2020) was 99% from noncompetitive states
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanhill
#2,208
#2,208
McDad said:
I'd rather you call me the worst insult imaginable than call.me a lawyer...even metaphorically.

I'm asking questions trying to decide something unknown. In my business, getting as much factual data as possible...whether I agree or not...is imperative for success.
Click to expand...
Bama Fan< Lawyer?
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider and McDad
#2,209
#2,209
BigOrangeMojo said:
The bottom chart was before they counted over 15M (mostly D votes in Cali). Yeah, way to compare full results in prior years to one missing a state with 50 million people.

More people voted in battleground states in 2024 than 2020 (Kamala got prett much the same number as Biden).
Click to expand...
Cali has slightly less than 40M ppl.
 
#2,212
#2,212
McDad said:
I'd rather you call me the worst insult imaginable than call.me a lawyer...even metaphorically.

I'm asking questions trying to decide something unknown. In my business, getting as much factual data as possible...whether I agree or not...is imperative for success.
Click to expand...
If it talks like a lawyer and quacks like a lawyer....
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top