Sandvol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2010
- Messages
- 12,785
- Likes
- 3,721
For those who don't want the added burden i believe they are eligible for federal assistance already so I'm not sure what would be different other than the right to vote.
For those who don't want the added burden i believe they are eligible for federal assistance already so I'm not sure what would be different other than the right to vote.
Territories and people who have done so much for us, and we just treat them like expendable parts.
And the posters on here who think it a bad idea because it might (emphasize might) cost them an additional 0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 percent of their income. Maybe. Not even a given.
Shameful.
It's time something is done about this. Statehood or not, but at least figure out a new voting/representation system. At the very least.
What exactly has PR done for us?
Volunteer inordinately per capita to defend your freedom in places like Afghanistan and Iraq. Or so neocons describe it.
But, seriously, defend you in WWI, WWII, and Korea (well, that's not really defense in Korea, but still).
Let me ask you this. If the population of Puerto Rico would overwhelmingly vote raging conservative, would you be more inclined to bring them into the fold?
Actually, don't even answer that. I already know the answer.
Volunteer inordinately per capita to defend your freedom in places like Afghanistan and Iraq. Or so neocons describe it.
But, seriously, defend you in WWI, WWII, and Korea (well, that's not really defense in Korea, but still).
Let me ask you this. If the population of Puerto Rico would overwhelmingly vote raging conservative, would you be more inclined to bring them into the fold?
Actually, don't even answer that. I already know the answer.