Qanon -The Storm

QPost 1824
Q !A6yxsPKia. No.123
Aug 6 2018 19:13:45 (EST) G7GDP2018.png
Ask yourself, if the U.S. GDP is greater than the total of all others combined (G7), which allows us to negotiate from a position of strength, why would previous President's 'knowingly' [unequally] distribute America's wealth away by making unbalanced trade deals?
Why was America's wealth being distributed WW?
Why was the American taxpayer essentially subsidizing the the rest of the world?
The AMERICAN TAXPAYER has no equal anywhere in the world.
ACCESS to the AMERICAN CONSUMER (U.S. Market) is ESSENTIAL for every major country in the world.
AMERICA WAS SYSTEMATICALLY BEING WEAKENED.
OUR MILITARY WAS SYSTEMATICALLY BEING WEAKENED.
AMERICA IS BACK TO LEADING.
AMERICA FIRST.
THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN POTUS HAS NO STRINGS ATTACHED.
Q


Any and all of the Q posts could be interchanged with any of the others at any time and people will see what they want to see.

The kid probably writes these with the help of 4Chan buddies like 30 at a time. All ambiguous enough to plausibly deny being wrong about a prediction.

I pity the people who fall for this nonsense.
 
I can't wait until we find out that Q is really Russian hacker Guccifer 2.0.
He and his thugs sit around their compound doing vodka shots and laughing: " Эй, давай снова поиграем с немыми американцами !"*








*{Hey let's f*** with the dumb Americans again}
 
  • Like
Reactions: Septic and Mick
I can't wait until we find out that Q is really Russian hacker Guccifer 2.0.
He and his thugs sit around their compound doing vodka shots and laughing: " Эй, давай снова поиграем с немыми американцами !"*








*{Hey let's f*** with the dumb Americans again}
I think it's steve bannon on a perpetual bender
 


Note how she secretly made the "Q" letter/sign/insideinfo

cD0RFbv3gpZFACWNzKGeYjohJnckmPn5PHAW-a5QL0XYRk6ZgwiBdmQ6F2TcuKXhK8Xa44KanKGvOhSmHLtFTegiszU=w1684-h1069-n-k-no-nu
 
This nonsense is either Reddit/4chan trolls or some racist idiots still mad that Obama was elected President. The people buying it are beyond reasoning with at this point. They have reached peak Red Hat cult status. They get special Maga hats.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Septic
This nonsense is either Reddit/4chan trolls or some racist idiots still mad that Obama was elected President. The people buying it are beyond reasoning with at this point. They have reached peak Red Hat cult status. They get special Maga hats.
You mean Maga helmets.

4c9e9129-26ab-4c6b-ba01-b145b57381c5.png
 
1824
06-Aug-2018 20:13:45 EDT
Q !A6yxsPKia.8ch/patriotsfight 123Copy link

a7e6fcff53e0145b2706101209f9f5f1e8be5f21d41064f1a4dde8d0e0f3a119.png


Ask yourself, if the U.S. GDP is greater than the total of all others  combined (G7), which allows us to negotiate from a position of strength, why would previous President's 'knowingly' [unequally] distribute America's wealth away by making unbalanced trade deals?
Why was America's wealth being distributed WW? 
Why was the American taxpayer essentially subsidizing the the rest of the world?
The AMERICAN TAXPAYER has no equal anywhere in the world. 
ACCESS to the AMERICAN CONSUMER (U.S. Market) is ESSENTIAL for every major country in the world. 
AMERICA WAS SYSTEMATICALLY BEING WEAKENED.
OUR MILITARY WAS SYSTEMATICALLY BEING WEAKENED.
AMERICA IS BACK TO LEADING.
AMERICA FIRST.
THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN POTUS HAS NO STRINGS ATTACHED.
Q
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obsessed
I can't wait until we find out that Q is really Russian hacker Guccifer 2.0.
He and his thugs sit around their compound doing vodka shots and laughing: " Эй, давай снова поиграем с немыми американцами !"*








*{Hey let's f*** with the dumb Americans again}

🍿 🍿 🍿
 
It seems to me you're upset that anyone dare question the "official stories" pumped out daily by corporate run media.

I don't blindly believe everything I've read online since I started following Q (7-8 months). It has given me the objectivity to see things more clearly. I research more now than I ever have before. I try to get more information to understand what's really happening.

The coordination / synchronicity of separate major media outlets is impossible to ignore if you're paying attention.

Trump gets 90% negative coverage by the MSM. Why?

His administration has been successful on the economy and jobs. His loudest critics appear to want him to fail at anything & everything - even if that means going to war with North Korea or Russia.

Other than his personality, style and the fact he defeated Hillary Clinton - what are the things he has done to deserve 90% negative coverage?

Russian collusion is a fairy tale. It didn't happen, but the media published stories with anonymous sources saying it did. The media is complicit in a plot to impeach President Trump.

The truth will be revealed - I hope you're prepared for it.

Here's a perfect example of the "fake news" negative coverage the MSM pushes every day since Trump was elected.

Dj-h4PTXgAAXI_r


They expect people to believe the job approval for Trump is 40% when all of his other numbers are extremely positive compared to Obama.
 
Going by FiveThirtyEight which is the average of all the polls, it isn't far off, but whatever.
Rasmussen isn't the gold standard. Sorry.
fd4cca4-3183-4ffb-9fe6-7ba5e0a7378f.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Septic
Going by FiveThirtyEight which is the average of all the polls, it isn't far off, but whatever.
Rasmussen isn't the gold standard. Sorry.
View attachment 162082

I'm saying the people being polled aren't a good representation of the country.

Just like so many of the polls prior to 2016 election were of "likely voters". They missed a huge group of people that weren't likely voters who ultimately voted for Trump.

These polls are flawed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol
I'm saying the people being polled aren't a good representation of the country.

Just like so many of the polls prior to 2016 election were of "likely voters". They missed a huge group of people that weren't likely voters who ultimately voted for Trump.

These polls are flawed.
What degree did you get in survey research and methodology? That's impressive.
 
I'm saying the people being polled aren't a good representation of the country.

Just like so many of the polls prior to 2016 election were of "likely voters". They missed a huge group of people that weren't likely voters who ultimately voted for Trump.

These polls are flawed.


The polls just prior to the election were tight. It's a widely held myth by the red hat's that there was a wide margin in the polls between the candidates going into the election.

The polls are a snapshot in time, not predictions of what may happen. The polling was and is an accurate measure of how people feel in that moment.

The polls aren't flawed, your understanding of them is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TennTom
It was expected that Hillary would win?

Further, who needs a degree in “polls” to evaluate their veracity? I know many engineers who I would not trust to build sandcastles, or change the batteries in a TV remote.

View attachment 162087
I just think it's funny that you rubes with zero experience in a science think you're better than the experts. It's fascinating. Happens here all the time.
 
I just think it's funny that you rubes with zero experience in a science think you're better than the experts. It's fascinating. Happens here all the time.

Says the guy who refuses to acknowledge the media coverage is blatantly biased.
 
Says the guy who refuses to acknowledge the media coverage is blatantly biased.

Shhh. Let him be. He has a severe case of “smartest guy in the room” syndrome. This is the same guy who said he could beat me in golf, while playing exclusively with a putter and one hand tied behind his back.

Delusion on ‘roids.
 
Shhh. Let him be. He has a severe case of “smartest guy in the room” syndrome. This is the same guy who said he could beat me in golf, while playing exclusively with a putter and one hand tied behind his back.

Delusion on ‘roids.
I'm not the nitwit claiming to be more knowledgeable than the experts. Your butthurt is noted. Stick to your little weightlifting fantasies kid. You're out of your element.
 
Senate Democrats Are Circulating Plans for Government Takeover of the Internet: Reason Roundup

Newscom - All your base are belong to us. A leaked memo circulating among Senate Democrats contains a host of bonkers authoritarian proposals for regulating digital platforms, purportedly as a way to get tough on Russian bots and fake news. To save American trust in "our institutions, democracy, free press, and markets," it suggests, we need unprecedented and undemocratic government intervention into online press and markets, including "comprehensive (GDPR-like) data protection legislation" of the sort enacted in the E.U.

....

Which Party is the most dangerous to our freedom? Maybe the DEMs?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol

VN Store



Back
Top