Qanon -The Storm

May be a good video for people new to Q.
Qanon December 21 - The 16 Year Plan to Destroy America


prayingmedic


Good video. Stepping back you can see what actions happened to see this plan come to fruition.. then she lost. They lost all progress and some issues have been corrected. Otherwise the USA would have been screwed, sold out part and parcel.
 
New: Title TBD
2641
Q!!mG7VJxZNCI22 Dec 2018 - 10:48:03 PM
📁
How can the 'LEFT' refute this?
What happens when you can no longer trust those elected to represent you?
FAKE! FAKE! FAKE!
TRUTH & FACTS MATTER.
Anons can play this game all day long.
Q

LOL...Making a bucket of popcorn for this one... but I suspect Mick, evil and Lg won't touch this one... they really can't, but I know they won't resist some sort of bs response... bring it fellas.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD
LOL...Making a bucket of popcorn for this one... but I suspect Mick, evil and Lg won't touch this one... they really can't, but I know they won't resist some sort of bs response... bring it fellas.
Their attention span may not be over a minute. Doubt they’ll watch.
 
New: Title TBD
2641
Q!!mG7VJxZNCI22 Dec 2018 - 10:48:03 PM
📁
How can the 'LEFT' refute this?
What happens when you can no longer trust those elected to represent you?
FAKE! FAKE! FAKE!
TRUTH & FACTS MATTER.
Anons can play this game all day long.
Q

They can refute it in some illogical twisted measure... at which point I’ll call them liars. Notice neither Obama or Clinton mentioned a wall... a more solid solution that makes all the other waste unnecessary. After all if they can’t get foot on American soil there is no need for increased catch and release, no need to vet illegals for welfare, no need to spend more on prosecuting them. The wall would effectively cut out a lot of expense. Plus reducing drug routes, human trafficking and anchor babies.1545549175514.gif
 
Let me help you with this one.
@lawgator1 @Mick @evillawyer

Haha. Really? This is a softball guys. Being against the wall is not being against border security. The wall is not smart policy. It's a vanity project grounded in Trump and Miller's xenophobia. I think the Dems have been willing to offer up money for border security, but not for the stupid wall.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RockyTop85
Haha. Really? This is a softball guys. Being against the wall is not being against border security. The wall is not smart policy. It's a vanity project grounded in Trump and Miller's xenophobia. I think the Dems have been willing to offer up money for border security, but not for the stupid wall.

How do the democrats propose to effectively end illegal immigration across the southern border?

Don't give me the talking points either. I want to know details.

Without a physical barrier your party is just talking. The barrier / wall is needed to fix this, but democrats are concerned only about politics.
 

You still can't explain the extraordinary number of "coincidences".

2 tweets below are proof. Compare date & times.


IMG_6017.PNG

IMG_6018.PNG

Have you ever asked yourself why the mainstream media is giving so much coverage to this "fringe alt-right conspiracy theory cult"?

Why not ignore it? What is the point in so much effort by the media to debunk Q?

Seriously, who is this coverage directly intended to influence?

A "cult" that encourages people to research for themselves and stop taking all media reports at face value.
 
You still can't explain the extraordinary number of "coincidences".

2 tweets below are proof. Compare date & times.


View attachment 185064

View attachment 185065

Have you ever asked yourself why the mainstream media is giving so much coverage to this "fringe alt-right conspiracy theory cult"?

Why not ignore it? What is the point in so much effort by the media to debunk Q?

Seriously, who is this coverage directly intended to influence?

A "cult" that encourages people to research for themselves and stop taking all media reports at face value.


1) The money was Iran's. It had been seized. The US didn't "give" Iran $150 billion.

2) it was part of a negotiated deal to stop Iranian nuclear development. An agreement the international community says was working.

3) You keep leaving out the most important part. The Dems say they will vote for wall $ if there is also DACA fix and reasonable pathway to citizenship.

Here's the thing. If you take each of those things -- wall, DACA, and pathway-- each one polls over 50 percent.

The Dems are willing to do all three. It is NOT the Dems who are thwarting the will of the people. It is Trump and the GOP who want to keep this issue alive for theater because idiots like you will fall for it and keep voting for them and sending them money.
 
1) The money was Iran's. It had been seized. The US didn't "give" Iran $150 billion.

2) it was part of a negotiated deal to stop Iranian nuclear development. An agreement the international community says was working.

3) You keep leaving out the most important part. The Dems say they will vote for wall $ if there is also DACA fix and reasonable pathway to citizenship.

Here's the thing. If you take each of those things -- wall, DACA, and pathway-- each one polls over 50 percent.

The Dems are willing to do all three. It is NOT the Dems who are thwarting the will of the people. It is Trump and the GOP who want to keep this issue alive for theater because idiots like you will fall for it and keep voting for them and sending them money.

I'm not talking about the accuracy of the tweets.

I'm specifically talking about Trump tweeting a near identical tweet just 6 hours after a Q follower sent his tweet.

I'm talking about the POTUS confirming Q movement for Q followers.

How is this hard to understand?
 
I'm not talking about the accuracy of the tweets.

I'm specifically talking about Trump tweeting a near identical tweet just 6 hours after a Q follower sent his tweet.

I'm talking about the POTUS confirming Q movement for Q followers.

How is this hard to understand?

It's not surprising he retweets something seized on by Woods nor was it a new concept.
 
Here’s a coincidence: Trump loses in court. Often. The only legal battles I can remember him winning in the last two years were brought by Michael Avenatti?

What’s the mathematical probability (numbers) of him masterminding the investigation, trial, and conviction of hundreds of corrupt civil servants when he can’t draft executive orders that pass constitutional muster?
 

VN Store



Back
Top