Qanon -The Storm

[Stew Cook]

View attachment 294989
They broke through the gate and entered a private street that was private property.

Well, the gate wasn't destroyed, at the time the protesters went through it apparently.

 

[Jxn Vol]

Well, the gate wasn't destroyed, at the time the protesters went through it apparently.

They may have well walked through his front door. They were trespassing on private property. Case closed.

 

[OldVolMan]

View attachment 294985

The t shirt looks a little bulky around the sleeves and neck,
she should really consider a smaller size t shirt

 

[Electric Orange]

The t shirt looks a little bulky around the sleeves and neck,
she should really consider a smaller size t shirt

Yeah maybe make it white also on a rainy day.

 

[Mick]

Mick, I don't disagree, but they advertise as:

"Twitter is, what’s happening in the world and what people are talking about right now."

"We advocate for free expression and protecting the health of the public conversation around the world."

"Elections Integrity - We’re focused on serving the public conversation."

There have been instances of obvious bias. Joe Rogan has even addressed it on his podcast. But, as you stated, Twitter is well within its rights to censor as it sees fit.

It's obvious, following Q is unhealthy.

 

[Rockvegas]

They may have well walked through his front door. They were trespassing on private property. Case closed.

In an interview, the home owners stated they were told by the protesters “this was their home now and were going to kill them”.After killing them, the protesters also stated they were going to watch TV in that room, shower in the bathrooms and sleep in the main bedroom. I have no idea if any of this was actually said to the home owners, but no one has challenged their assertions either.that

 

[Orange_Crush]

Wasn't aware of those details, were they on those person's property? If so, they might have a better defense.

The street they were on was private property. They'd kicked in a gate to get into the gated community.

 

[Septic]

Keep poking fun. You all might not admit it, but I know you all are starting to second guess your thoughts on this now.

 

[Stew Cook]

The street they were on was private property. They'd kicked in a gate to get into the gated community.

Maybe one or more people forced the gate open, who knows? Legally, I think they're in hot water, as pointing guns at trespassers is generally not OK. Regardless, if they can be convincing that they were in fear for their lives, I doubt much will come of it.

 

[tennvols77]

It's obvious, following Q is unhealthy.

Today, it seems, you need a little levity for everything and anything, just a nice peaceful happy middle of the road attitude.

All of this is unhealthy, extreme spectrum's and attitudes, and more comical, the insanity of making life everyday more angry and miserable, no wonder people are how they are they do it to themselves.

Oh well, to each their own I guess.

 

[Septic]

Who said QAnon is about politics?

You must live in a dimension where you can arbitrarily say something contrary to reality and *poof* it's suddenly "true".

Donald lives in that same perceived reality, is that why so many qanon supporters coincidentally supports his non political bid at taking down the "deep state" democrats? In a non political way, of course.

 

[Orange_Crush]

Maybe one or more people forced the gate open, who knows? Legally, I think they're in hot water, as pointing guns at trespassers is generally not OK. Regardless, if they can be convincing that they were in fear for their lives, I doubt much will come of it.

I doubt much will come of it at all since you had a mob of people had trespassed on private property, during a time when mobs of people are burning, looting, beating and murdering.

The legal question is, "Did you fear for the life or bodily harm of yourself or others?"

(1) That's an incredibly subjective question.

(2) In this time and climate, it's not a hard legal argument to make.

(2b) The dude's an attorney. I'm sure he knows that.

It's kind of like similar news stories. You don;t have the right to run over people just because they are blocking your progress in your car. It's a completely different situation when people are blocking your progress while a mob descends on your car, screaming and knocking your car windows out.

Face it. It's a dangerous time to be a member of a mob right now. You probably don't want to be a member of a mob that's trespassing or descending on vehicles.

 

[NurseGoodVol]

Even if that were a given, the reason to delete it would be?

I swear, the QAnon thing scares some of you to death for some weird reason.

To contemplate anything that goes outside a normal mental construct that people live their existance in is difficult for some. I believe it is taking information that largely goes against that construct, maybe errant data maybe not and trying to make it fit into their world view.
If it doesn't some people reject the whole outright and lambast those who don't agree with them.

 

[Orange_Vol1321]

Second guess what? That a bunch of people share QAnon hashtags, and coordinate harrassment.

There is no organizational structure that I can tell. If there is one, I suppose a representative could sue Twitter.

Maybe a 33rd.degree Baker, sanctioned by the man himself will surface and take Twitter on, but if there is no leadership, there is no control or official condemnation of those exhibiting the offensive behavior. You see the problem?

Twitter banning the discussion tells you everything you need to know. Get your head out of the sand.

 

[NurseGoodVol]

Twitter removes, bans and suspends thousands of accounts associated with QAnon conspiracy theory group

Two months ago, Twitter began fact-checking President Donald Trump's tweets. Now, it's removing and suspending accounts associated with QAnon, a conspiracy theory group that has supported the president.

The social network Tuesday night announced via tweets on its Twitter Safety account that actions were being taken against "so-called 'QAnon' activity across the service."

Twitter took different actions against accounts associated with QAnon for various reasons, including violations of its rules against glorifying violence.

"We've been clear that we will take strong enforcement action on behavior that has the potential to lead to offline harm," the Twitter Safety account tweeted Tuesday.

# # #

As I've stated previously, this thread needs to be deleted. Permanently.

Don't touch the link if you are so offended that you are running around with your hair on fire.

 

[Stew Cook]

Twitter banning the discussion tells you everything you need to know. Get your head out of the sand.

I really don't care either way. QAnon can be coopted by anyone, and that apparently is the problem.

 

[ajvol01]

I really don't care either way. QAnon can be coopted by anyone, and that apparently is the problem.

How so?

 

[Stew Cook]

How so?

Because QAnon has been coopted from the beginning. Evidenced by the debate on wether Q is the original Q. And that doesn't even matter, because with Twitter/Social Media anyone/group can identify as being representative.

Maybe I'm wrong here, but what has QAnon, as an entity, done to disavow the problem posers?

 

[NurseGoodVol]

Could be something to this

I've seen multiple times people being told this is not about action it is about information. The contingent that wants some to be violent are reminded of this consistently.

 

[Mick]

I've seen multiple times people being told this is not about action it is about information. The contingent that wants some to be violent are reminded of this consistently.

Just because some q people show violence doesn't mean they all are. Good point.

Assessing the Threat of QAnon Violence - GNET

 

[NurseGoodVol]

Just because some q people show violence doesn't mean they all are. Good point.

Assessing the Threat of QAnon Violence - GNET

Are you talking about mentally ill people who fixate? If yes then Q is not the only movement this has happened to. More mentally ill people have used God to kill others than any other fixation in history.

 

[ajvol01]

I've seen multiple times people being told this is not about action it is about information. The contingent that wants some to be violent are reminded of this consistently.

I think it’s had a calming effect (Calm before the storm ) for some who might have felt some need to act otherwise

 

[Orange_Crush]

Because QAnon has been coopted from the beginning. Evidenced by the debate on wether Q is the original Q. And that doesn't even matter, because with Twitter/Social Media anyone/group can identify as being representative.

Maybe I'm wrong here, but what has QAnon, as an entity, done to disavow the problem posers?

QAnon has a digital signature. But it'd also be hard to duplicate the social media marker times with Trump posts the way Q has repeatedly done. You're referencing a social media debate when this would probably be better as a cryptographic and statistical discussion.

In other words, you're more than welcome to share the proof that "QAnon has been coopted from the beginning", but you'll need to consider the cryptographic and statistical points as well. If Q gives evidence that he/she/they is/are working closely with President Trump, then it undermines even the need to discuss whether Q has been coopted.

 

[Mick]

Are you talking about mentally ill people who fixate? If yes then Q is not the only movement this has happened to. More mentally ill people have used God to kill others than any other fixation in history.

No, I'm not talking about the mentally ill. I'm talking about the movement and bad elements within.

 

[Orange_Crush]

No, I'm not talking about the mentally ill. I'm talking about the movement and bad elements within.

Can you give specifics?