Qanon -The Storm

You are on fire dude, 2 posts, both wrong. Care to go for the trifecta?
Well only one was actually directed at you, but since you insist sure. I'm sure since you apparently believe in Q that you also believe in giving your money to Nigerian princes.
 
Buckle up, ABC said things could get much, much worse


I'm not sure if it is real or not, but why would anyone want to slander an effort to fight evil in any way? Even if you do not believe it, is there a reason to slander the movement or its believers? What is wrong with hoping it is true? With all the evil going on is it crazy to at least have some hope in something?
You don't have to like Repubs or Trump to wish for success against evil.

I'm sure ABC was intending to discredit it, but they actually gave it powerful advertising.
 
Last edited:
Buckle up, ABC said things could get much, much worse

I'm not a q follower but I would consider myself an open minded skeptic. But this is what we get when journalism dies and become arms of political parties, people look to other sources for information.

You can't complain about it when you're part of the problem.
 
Wtf is he talking about?

Plane load of people in uniforms and weapons?
He's talking about the president's interview where he said a plane load of people in dark uniforms were headed to Washington, you know, just another day in the life of having a conspiracy believing president.
 


Hold your horses... Section 5. And who enforces Section 3? It doesn't mention the executive branch. Also, Section 4 has some interesting stuff with regards to debts brought on during insurrection...

Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.

Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
 
4635
Link to New Q Drop
Q!!Hs1Jq13jV68 Sep 2020 - 1:46:22 PM

ESdzCrbXYAAkgre.jpg
History repeats itself (today).
RE: IRREGULAR WARFARE
RE: TACTICS DEPLOYED v AMERICA
Compare & Contrast
Then v Now
SA | Definition, History, & Facts๐Ÿ“
Then: methods of violent intimidation deployed by SA
Now: methods of violent intimidation deployed by Antifa?
Then: battles raged in the streets [book burning, flag burning, destruction, hate, anti-police, etc]
Now: battles raging in the streets controlled by [D] party sympathizers [anti-republic]?
Then: physical assaults of political opponents
Now: physical assaults of political opponents?
Then: voter intimidation in National and local elections
Now: voter intimidation in National and local elections [coming 11.3]?
Then: project anti-fascist platform: reality: conform/obey strong-arm tactics deployed to silence opposing views
Now: project anti-fascist platform: reality: conform/obey strong-arm tactics deployed to silence opposing views?
Then: radical anti-capitalistic platform (socialism)
Now: radical anti-capitalistic platform (socialism) push?
Then: force economic destruction as recruiting [division] tactic to drive enlistment rate
Now: [D] party gov/mayor(s) close state(s) force economic hardships [C19]?
Then: SA carried out unchecked street violence against Jews and Nazi opponents
Now: [D] gov/mayor(s) carried out unchecked [deliberate non_prosecution orders 24-hour release] of Antifa rioters arrested [street violence โ€“ block-by-block takeover(s)]?
[D] gov/mayor(s) release of violent criminals [many thousands] from prison(s) under guise of C19?
Nazi Propaganda๐Ÿ“
Use of propaganda by Nazi Germany
Use of propaganda by MSDNC / Social Media (control of narrative โ€“ terminate opposing message (censorship-kill))
Soros history
Assault on America.
Ask yourself, why are [D] party leaders refusing to condemn the violence?
Ask yourself, why are [D] party leaders refusing to seek a unified republic?
IT WAS NEVER ABOUT THE VIRUS AND ALWAYS ABOUT THE ELECTION
Was the Nazi party ever truly destroyed (eradicated)?
Did the belief carry-on [re-deployed]?
๐Ÿ“
Background of Soros?
Q
 
  • Like
Reactions: DC_Vol

VN Store



Back
Top