Tyler Durden
I see all this potential, and I see it squandered.
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2019
- Messages
- 3,426
- Likes
- 2,858
“ The Qnuts have already shown the ability and desire to terrorize random places”Because Qanon is equivalent to Al-Qaeda in its infancy. The Qnuts have already shown the ability and desire to terrorize random places in order to cleanse and liberate the population from whatever dystopian bs they think is going on. Like Al-Qaeda and ISIS, Qanon's endgame is to murder anyone who isn't in lock step with their twisted ideology.
Some guy in NY killed a mob boss and was supposedly a Q follower“ The Qnuts have already shown the ability and desire to terrorize random places”
I know the woman in Texas but can you enlighten me to more examples (the shot to the hard drive wasn’t a “Qnut””
A quick google search of “QAnon Assault” bring up more examples of “Qnuts” being assaulted than doing the assaulting
Because Qanon is equivalent to Al-Qaeda in its infancy. The Qnuts have already shown the ability and desire to terrorize random places in order to cleanse and liberate the population from whatever dystopian bs they think is going on. Like Al-Qaeda and ISIS, Qanon's endgame is to murder anyone who isn't in lock step with their twisted ideology.
Sure, I linked to this earlier:“ The Qnuts have already shown the ability and desire to terrorize random places”
I know the woman in Texas but can you enlighten me to more examples (the shot to the hard drive wasn’t a “Qnut””
A quick google search of “QAnon Assault” bring up more examples of “Qnuts” being assaulted than doing the assaulting
Swiiiiing and a miss.Because Qanon is equivalent to Al-Qaeda in its infancy. The Qnuts have already shown the ability and desire to terrorize random places in order to cleanse and liberate the population from whatever dystopian bs they think is going on. Like Al-Qaeda and ISIS, Qanon's endgame is to murder anyone who isn't in lock step with their twisted ideology.
You've yet to even attempt to tell me, or any of the other posters who call out this crap for what it is, why we're wrong. I'll wait. Hopefully you'll come up with an answer before the Clintons get arrested.Because your thought process is that of a 7th grader.
You’re completely out of your depth.
I’m perfectly happy for you to run along and stop trolling this thread.
No, I said it is equivalent to Al-Qaeda in its infancy, here's my actual quote:You said QAnon = Al Qaeda
No reply necessary.
I then linked to multiple articles that proved my point.Because Qanon is equivalent to Al-Qaeda in its infancy. The Qnuts have already shown the ability and desire to terrorize random places in order to cleanse and liberate the population from whatever dystopian bs they think is going on. Like Al-Qaeda and ISIS, Qanon's endgame is to murder anyone who isn't in lock step with their twisted ideology.
Sure, I linked to this earlier:
QAnon conspiracy theorists have been linked to a killing and multiple armed stand-offs. Here are the criminal allegations connected to the movement and its followers.
Here's some more:
Subscribe to read | Financial Times
FBI Labels Fringe Conspiracy Theories as Domestic Terrorism Threat
Redirect Notice
QAnon supporter 'chased motorists she thought were pedophiles' | Daily Mail Online
My Father, the QAnon Conspiracy Theorist
PolitiFact: QAnon hoax has been linked to violence. Fox News’ Greg Gutfeld falsely claimed it hasn’t
This quote from you is precisely why you don’t deserve a reply.No, I said it is equivalent to Al-Qaeda in its infancy, here's my actual quote:
I then linked to multiple articles that proved my point.
And here you are, still unable to tell me, or any of the other posters who call out this crap for what it is, how we're wrong. Which comes first, your explanation or the Clintons in handcuffs?
Qanon's endgame is to murder anyone who isn't in lock step with their twisted ideology.
This fallacious reasoning has already been covered in this thread.No, I said it is equivalent to Al-Qaeda in its infancy, here's my actual quote:
I then linked to multiple articles that proved my point.
And here you are, still unable to tell me, or any of the other posters who call out this crap for what it is, how we're wrong. Which comes first, your explanation or the Clintons in handcuffs?