bleedorange4life
Member
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2005
- Messages
- 162
- Likes
- 0
and vandy is REALLY a better team than ut(IndianaVol @ Jan 5 said:dont have a problem with texas winning but not convinced they were the better team imo
SO by that logic, the New England Pats will win the Super Bowl because "recent history" shows them as the "better team"...
That's :bs: !!!
The better team did win last night, the one that handled the pressure when it mattered, had the better leadership (i.e. didn't call run up the middle on 4th and 2 on the 45 with your best player on the sidelines!!!, and put together all the pieces of the puzzle...great game!!!
And by the way, all you Vince Young maniacs out there...one person does not the team make.
Congrats 'horns!!!
We'll see ya in the NC game next year...
:bow:(VOL_AHOLIC @ Jan 5 said:u guys must be on drugs. the dude lead the nation in completion % and gave texas a huge offensive production.
yeah. ill take vince over ainge any day of the week and twice on sunday. yes, sunday is when the guys in the nfl play.
480 yards of total production and 3 TDs.
ps. pass that sh*t over here. :devilsmoke:
(GAVol @ Jan 5 said:Psst . . . . . . . Steve Young, Roger Staubach, John Elway, Fran Tarkenton etc.
(VOLracerx @ Jan 5 said:As I said before - I COULD BE WRONG- just a personal opinion.
The Associated Press National Championship has been recognized by the ncaasince 1936, and is every bit as legit as the bcs.(Lexvol @ Jan 5 said:For the record, USC was not competing for their third National Championship. They were competing for their second consecutive national championship. The BCS is the NCAA endorsed method for determining the "Official National Champion of NCAA Football". The Sears trophy goes to one team.
I started out pulling for USC, but was actually for Texas by the end of the game. I'm glad they won too, but really don't care who says who was the best ever.I was happy that Texas won, and we don't have to sit around and listen to people talk about this USC team being "best ever".
Cause that's what people do. Cause it makes for an interesting debate, who is better between the great teams of today vs the great teams of the past. :twocents:Why do people feel the need? I just don't understand it.
(jakez4ut @ Jan 5 said:Well, i really didn't want TX to win, i hate TX....but i found myself really sick of hearing about USC....and i was then rooting for TX to stop USC on that 4th down play in the 4th qtr.....
.
Darn, I never knew that UT has 7 National Championships. Did anyone else scroll down far ebough to see that Vandy has a couple of NCs as well?(Cajun Vol @ Jan 5 said:Want to see something really funny. Tennessee is not an undisputed champion in 1998. Ohio State topped one of the polls. Look how many champions there are for some years. This is freakin ridiculous, the NCAA needs to stop officially naming champions. PLAYOFFS! PLAYOFFS! PLAYOFFS!
http://www.ncaa.org/champadmin/ia_football_past_champs.html
yep, can't beat that...i just have some co workers in Dallas that are so Pro-"anything to do with TX" that i didn't think i could stand to hear from them, especially when they try to give me a bunch of crap about the "real UT" or burn is better than bright etc.....but alas, USC turned out to be the evil empire, and they had to be stopped. good riddence to ML, RB, LW, DJ, SS etc....(Orangewhiteblood @ Jan 5 said:Well that makes two of us. Two of my ex girlfriends graduated from Texas, put yourself in my shoes. :ermm: I was still pulling hard for them last night and I'm glad they won.