Realistic 2013 class predictions...

#51
#51
zansdad said:
So it's not cool for that guy to leave "us" in the dark but if he is willing to share with you, then it's okay for you to leave us in the dark? That seems logical.
Click to expand...

Dude Zans seriously? Why are you trying to pick a fight?

He said he'd tell me, if he feels comfortable telling me and not y'all that's his choice, sorry. This isn't kindergarten where all is fair and if he tells me a secret I have to tell you the secret.
 
#52
#52
bleedingTNorange said:
Dude Zans seriously? Why are you trying to pick a fight?

He said he'd tell me, if he feels comfortable telling me and not y'all that's his choice, sorry. This isn't kindergarten where all is fair and if he tells me a secret I have to tell you the secret.
Click to expand...

Check my edit. Man, you really don't have an off switch do you?
 
#53
#53
zansdad said:
Check my edit. Man, you really don't have an off switch do you?
Click to expand...

How was I supposed to know you edited it? All I read was your OP, which seemed like you were trying to start and argument, which is why I said, "why are you trying to pick a fight".

I'm trying to avoid the bickering and yet it seemed you were trying to provoke just that, just didn't get it. After seeing your edit, it makes more sense and if you meant it as a joke ok, without the edit a bit hard to tell your insinuation however.
 
Last edited:
#57
#57
bleedingTNorange said:
How was I supposed to know you edited it? All I read was your OP, which seemed like you were trying to start and argument, which is why I said, "why are you trying to pick a fight".

I'm trying to avoid the bickering and yet it seemed you were trying to provoke just that, just didn't get it. After seeing your edit, it makes more sense and if you meant it as a joke ok, without the edit a bit hard to tell your insinuation however.
Click to expand...

You see provocation when it isn't always there and instead of asking for clarification or treading slowly you come in with guns blazing all the time. It's not like it's not the same handful of us on this thread 99% of the time, yet if anyone even remotely disagrees with you, you launch a full attack. Trust me I don't come on here to argue with you or anyone else for that matter. But I do have my own opinions and will defend them. I expect other will do the same. However, we should be able to disagree without one side or the other going to full nuclear.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#60
#60
zansdad said:
You see provocation when it isn't always there and instead of asking for clarification or treading slowly you come in with guns blazing all the time. It's not like it's not the same handful of us on this thread 99% of the time, yet if anyone even remotely disagrees with you, you launch a full attack. Trust me I don't come on here to argue with you or anyone else for that matter. But I do have my own opinions and will defend them. I expect other will do the same. However, we should be able to disagree without one side or the other going to full nuclear.
Click to expand...

This is what you said to me, when you weren't even involved in the convo...So it's not cool for that guy to leave "us" in the dark but if he is willing to share with you, then it's okay for you to leave us in the dark? That seems logical....the last part about that seems logical was really not needed on your part, and is you basically saying I'm an idiot in other words, really not needed.

And i came at you guns blazing? All I said was why are you trying to pick a fight, which I thought was fair since you basically called me an idiot for no reason. If that's what you take as guns blazing I'd hate to see someone really come at you, geez. I asked a simple question, why are you trying to fight with me. You knew by saying, oh that seems logical, was a degrading comment that Id respond to, it wasn't needed.

Since you want everyone to play nice, maybe you could've worded it like, so how come you want him to tell you but then you're not gonna tell us, that doesn't seem fair. Instead of comin off and saying oh that seems real logical, like I said basically calling me an idiot.

Unbelievable. I'm done with this conversation, truly pathetic it got to this point.
 
Last edited:
#61
#61
bleedingTNorange said:
This is what you said to me, when you weren't even involved in the convo...So it's not cool for that guy to leave "us" in the dark but if he is willing to share with you, then it's okay for you to leave us in the dark? That seems logical....the last part about that seems logical was really not needed on your part, and is you basically saying I'm an idiot in other words, really not needed.

And i came at you guns blazing? All I said was why are you trying to pick a fight, which I thought was fair since you basically called me an idiot for no reason. If that's what you take as guns blazing I'd hate to see someone really come at you, geez. I asked a simple question, why are you trying to fight with me. You knew by saying, oh that seems logical, was a degrading comment that Id respond to.
Click to expand...

When else have I ever called you an idiot for you to jump from me asking if it was logical to me calling you an idiot? From here on out I think I will just stay on my side of the sandbox and leave you to yours.
 
#66
#66
zehr27 said:
I think you already know who I am talking about, but keep in mind some recruits like to keep things quite so their announcements are more fun.
Click to expand...

Absolutely.

Well hey shoot me an email if you wanna elaborate, would love to hear more.

Thanks.
 
#67
#67
zehr27 said:
I think you already know who I am talking about, but keep in mind some recruits like to keep things quite so their announcements are more fun.
Click to expand...

It's JW3 or King....but I'm leaning towards King. Just have this gut feeling Martin won his family over.
 
#69
#69
CAVol said:
Me too. Pulling King would be way bigger than pulling Stokes. jmo.
Click to expand...

I agree. He's a one and done type, which is strong for the program.

The bigger deal, he's Memphis number one priority, and there's no excuse of not having a scholarship like with Stokes. If CCM was to pull King I'm pretty sure Pastner would need his diaper changed, because that means CCM is in Memphis and is pulling guys Pastner wants.
 
#70
#70
bleedingTNorange said:
I agree. He's a one and done type, which is strong for the program.

The bigger deal, he's Memphis number one priority, and there's no excuse of not having a scholarship like with Stokes. If CCM was to pull King I'm pretty sure Pastner would need his diaper changed, because that means CCM is in Memphis and is pulling guys Pastner wants.
Click to expand...

Just something I've been thinking about today...

Would anyone be okay with landing King and not landing Hubbs? So our class would look like:

Landry
King
Nichols
and a random 4th guy.

Especially with the new of the big boys coming for Hubbs.
 
#71
#71
Golden, Hubbs, King, Nichols, Stokes...wow Just let that sink in for a second.
 
#75
#75
Stoked4Zo said:
I don't see any of those coming off the bench. I think McRae could be SEC 6th man of the year.
Click to expand...

I think you'd see a pretty even split of the minutes at the 2 and 3 between Hubbs, King, and McRae if that were to happen.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top