bhouston79
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2013
- Messages
- 393
- Likes
- 453
I think we could beat Kansas City, Arizona, and probably the Pittsburgh Steelers. The college teams just aren’t with our effort to try hard. That’s why we’re failing- just don’t recognize the competition as being worth giving a good 40% effort.Just thinking through the playoff teams ahead of us or potentially in and how we match up.
I’m categorizing this in : Should beat meaning we’re the better team.. could beat meaning we’re just as talented and it would be a solid game- and might be tough meaning I don’t think we match up well.. I don’t think anyone this year is clearly a dominate team:
Have beat: Bama
Should beat: Penn State, Boise State, Indiana, Miami/SMU, BYU/Colorado,
Notre Dame
Could beat: Bama again, Texas, Ohio state, ole miss (almost put them in the would be tough category)
Would be tough : Georgia, Oregon
Of course doing all of this back to back on the road is a ridiculous task but I think we’re better than 6 of the field, have beat one- and match up well with 10 of the field realistically- none of them are unbeatable though.
What’s everyone else’s thoughts?
We aren't beating Ala again unless it's at home. Ole Miss would be a really bad matchup on a neutral field. We could beat anybody at home. On a neutral site or at their house I'm not sure there's many we could beat, especially with how stagnant our offense has been.Just thinking through the playoff teams ahead of us or potentially in and how we match up.
I’m categorizing this in : Should beat meaning we’re the better team.. could beat meaning we’re just as talented and it would be a solid game- and might be tough meaning I don’t think we match up well.. I don’t think anyone this year is clearly a dominate team:
Have beat: Bama
Should beat: Penn State, Boise State, Indiana, Miami/SMU, BYU/Colorado,
Notre Dame
Could beat: Bama again, Texas, Ohio state, ole miss (almost put them in the would be tough category)
Would be tough : Georgia, Oregon
Of course doing all of this back to back on the road is a ridiculous task but I think we’re better than 6 of the field, have beat one- and match up well with 10 of the field realistically- none of them are unbeatable though.
What’s everyone else’s thoughts?
We are NOT better than Ole Miss. They are better defensive ( based off stats), better at QB, OL and WR. We are better at RB. DL we are even. On a neutral field or in Oxford, we would get our doors blown off. They would be a horrible matchup. The others are beatable on a neutral field. Although I'm not sure ND would be a good matchup either. The D is physical as hell and would own our Oline. Not sure they could score much on us though. Could easily be one of those 14-10 or 17-13 type games.We are better than
Indiana
BYU
Notre dame
Penn st
Ole miss
Boise st
If the chips fall right we could beat anyone that’s gonna be in the playoff.
Not on a neutral field. At home, absolutely. We wouldn't beat Ala, Oregon, Ohio St, Ole Miss nor GA on a neutral field or at their place.
The offense possesses the ability to not be a) ridiculously predictable, and b) stupidly conservative. We've played aggressively at times times this year with great success; we've played passively with no success. If you're going to lose, you go down swinging. Doing what you do, not something you're not designed for.Problem is this offense doesn't possess that ability this season. O is who they are. If Vols gonna make a playoff run the defense will need to elevate to an even higher level.
I agree that we should have changed and brought more pressure in the second half. It’s these reactionary fans who think they know something about the game being overly critical of a coach that’s done well this year that drives me madIt's one thing to make mistakes, it's another to have a bad game plan and not make adjustments.