Recruiting Football Talk VII

Status
Not open for further replies.
For anyone denying this, we know the following:

Michigan had a staffer dedicated to stealing signs
UT was a victim of sign scouting before the SC game
Clemson was also a victim of sign scouting
SC played inexplicably well against us
SC played inexplicably well against Clemson
Beamer has done this before

It’s not a conspiracy to connect the dots here. It’s 100% possible and actually probable based on the results.


Also, can we change our damn signs game to game?! This same concern came up last year.
 
For anyone denying this, we know the following:

Michigan had a staffer dedicated to stealing signs
UT was a victim of sign scouting before the SC game
Clemson was also a victim of sign scouting
SC played inexplicably well against us
SC played inexplicably well against Clemson
Beamer has done this before

It’s not a conspiracy to connect the dots here. It’s 100% possible and actually probable based on the results.


Also, can we change our damn signs game to game?! This same concern came up last year.
what difference does or will it make? i despise south carolina. we need to beat kentucky.
 
what difference does or will it make? i despise south carolina. we need to beat kentucky.
Prevent us from being further victimized by sign stealing, bring justice for dishonesty, and make me feel better that our coaching staff didn’t just lay an egg last year just to name a few.
 
The conspiracy of Michigan giving signs and signals to potential CFP competition and potential teams to jump loser of osu-um game makes sense for a few reasons:

-all of the teams that Michigan went to “scout” ended up losing vs a inferior opponent after said “scouting” occured: bama vs lsu, us and clemson vs uscjr, lsu vs a&m, oregon vs washington and OSU

-uscjr seemed to call the perfect plays vs our defense EVERY sing play

Michigan wanted insurance that if they lost vs osu, that they would still make playoffs, so they gave teams like a&m, uscjr, oregon state, etc the signs they stole so that those teams would upset the teams that had a realistic chance at jumping them if they lost vs osu or the big10 championship
Would be funny if those universities could prove it and sued Michigan on top of the ncaa rulings
 
College Football Blue Bloods
@bluebloodsbias
🚨 | BREAKING: Michigan allocated Connor Stalions $15,000 for travel/game tickets to record live signals of TEN opponents this season...

It has already been confirmed that he bought tickets to the following teams last season:

Ohio State
Georgia
Penn State
Oregon
USC
Alabama
Tennessee
Clemson
Michigan State
Rutgers
Maryland
Iowa
Indiana
Nebraska
Illinois
Purdue

College Football Blue Bloods
@bluebloodsbias
·
6h
Hasn’t been confirmed yet from secondary market data but probably TCU too

Hard to imagine they pull off a scouting operation of this magnitude & forget the one school they end up having to play in the CFP




 
Last edited:
Didn't know the NCAA angle.

So the NCAA knew but did nothing, so the guy leaked the story? Or the guy at the NCAA knew, based on previous experience at the NCAA, that the NCAA would do nothing? So he leaked instead? Or what?
The article I read just stated that Jim Stapleton (the leaker) has ties to the ncaa infraction committee. I thought he worked for but that may not be case as I can’t find the report saying that again. It doesn’t say if the ncaa knew or not, just that he is the sole source of info to ncaa. Apparently he had a lot to do with the rich rod firing as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Volunteer821
Look, it's always nothing until it's something.

- Two teams named directly as being scouted were Tennessee and Clemson
- South Carolina inexplicably had two amazing (some would say out of character) games against these two teams. Then immediately went back to being garbage.

It's obviously circumstantial and extremely unlikely but with as crooked and money hungry as this sport is now, it's also not outside the realm of possibility something crooked did happen.

Not extremely unlikely at all. 99% it happened.
 
Let’s be honest here, that Scar loss last year made zero sense. There’s upsets and then there’s whatever that was. 100% believe there is something fishy there. Beamer couldn’t dream of outcoaching CJH.
This, I said this yesterday, but its not the fact that they beat us thats fishy, its how. SCAR absolutely dominated like they were the top 5 team. Rattler played the 2 best games of his career and hasnt come close to those games since. Its not too far fetched to thing something nefarious couldve been at foot.
 
If you think about it, if they went to the green dot on the QB's helmet, I think it would benefit Heupel more than hurt him. Reason being as soon as the QB gets rid of the ball Heupel could start talking to him and get the next play in. So, possibly our offense would move even faster.
 
My confidence in the integrity of college football was very low, it's now pretty much non-existent. It's about as legit as WWE in my eyes.
I’m right there too. Between all this and the referees. It’s hard to get excited or into anything since the blatant Alabama game. 1 penalty for 5 yards my a$$
 
For anyone denying this, we know the following:

Michigan had a staffer dedicated to stealing signs
UT was a victim of sign scouting before the SC game
Clemson was also a victim of sign scouting
SC played inexplicably well against us
SC played inexplicably well against Clemson
Beamer has done this before

It’s not a conspiracy to connect the dots here. It’s 100% possible and actually probable based on the results.


Also, can we change our damn signs game to game?! This same concern came up last year.

I missed something…when did we discover Beamer stole signs🤔
 
  • Like
Reactions: knoxvol52
Look, it's always nothing until it's something.

- Two teams named directly as being scouted were Tennessee and Clemson
- South Carolina inexplicably had two amazing (some would say out of character) games against these two teams. Then immediately went back to being garbage.

It's obviously circumstantial and extremely unlikely but with as crooked and money hungry as this sport is now, it's also not outside the realm of possibility something crooked did happen.
What would be more interesting is to find out where most of the money was bet for those 2 games. Did most of the money come in on Tennessee and Clemson? If so, then there’s a good chance Vegas knew about it and was in on it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Volunteer821
What would be more interesting is to find out where most of the money was bet for those 2 games. Did most of the money come in on Tennessee and Clemson? If so, then there’s a good chance Vegas knew about it and was in on it.
Vegas was in on sign stealing?
 
Vegas was in on sign stealing?
Not saying that is the case. Just interested if they lost their butts in those 2 games against SC last year or not. Would be very unusual for them to lose a lot of money in 2 weeks back to back to the same opponent. Would add further evidence that SC was given info in those 2 games, if they did have to pay out a lot.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

VN Store



Back
Top