For the last time I don't hate Banks. He's just not very good, IMO. I'm sorry so many are disturbed by that. I see this window of opportunity and I can see it slipping through our fingers. I realize that any criticism of coaches is met by mob rioting
. I'm ok with that. Some will be right and some will be wrong. I'm very comfortable with my stance.
I think that very few here are as enamored with Banks as you suggest, I think that most simply aren't as absolute in the belief that he can't field a successful (enough) defense to get us a championship. You said he'll never sniff a championship...but...we were one game from a playoff appearance.
In that one loss:
1. No Jeremy Banks...defensive leader on the field...lost due to "issues".
2. The defense played inexplicably bad. Night and day worse from previous games.
3. The offense played ok, but not as well as they had.
4. SCARs offense played inexplicably well. Night and day great from previous games.
5. HH went down.
6. Possible sign stealing scandal.
Any one of those points could have flipped the game. Not a single one could be directly attributed to DC Banks.
So I disagree. There is decent evidence to support the belief that he could lead a defense of a championship team.
Is he the best in my mind? Probably not, but I couldn't name anyone currently available that should/would replace him, so that's academic.
I'm a smart guy, I well understand why boats float, but I know my limitations as an engineer and will gladly defer to someone like you if I need to build a boat. Likewise,
Heupel knows better than you or I what it takes to win. He's paid handsomely to do so and he doesn't appear in a rush to replace him. So I'll defer to him.