Orange_Crush
Resident windbag genius
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2004
- Messages
- 38,003
- Likes
- 75,903
i know what they claim to be but they are just really bad at their jobs…. i do feel it is an awesome idea if applied correctly….There use to be an anti-pff twitter account that would compare the players that they rated. It was hilarious to see how they compared various players.PFF watches every play. Good and bad.
Sacks are certainly positive plays. But current/popular statistics do not track negative plays for most positions. They only track specifics.
Think of an OT that whiffs on 10 run blocks in a game. But that isn't recorded anywhere against him. Is that a good game? Or a QB that throws it into the hands of a defender 5 times, but the defenders dropped every ball and the QB recorded 0 INTs. Is that good?
Modern statistics have so many holes. That's why folks and college and pro orgs have poured into PFF. Staff members also try to get jobs there. One specifically from Miami used to hound them...he never heard back
Another reason to think PFF is garbage……TJ Watt beats or ties Myles Garrett in every single statistical category… He had 5 more sacks than Myles and they still have Myles Garrett rated over him and not an All-Pro in their system. TJ is the first player to win the sack title three times and the 2nd player to have 19 sacks twice in a career.
Another reason to think PFF is garbage……TJ Watt beats or ties Myles Garrett in every single statistical category… He had 5 more sacks than Myles and they still have Myles Garrett rated over him and not an All-Pro in their system. TJ is the first player to win the sack title three times and the 2nd player to have 19 sacks twice in a career.
I read something very interesting back when John Fox got fired at the Panthers, but then did well at Denver. The best NFL coaches barely exceed .500 given enough real estate. Always.Carroll that's weird, he was king in Seattle..
Belichick's winning percentage of . 673 ranks second in NFL history among