Nash_Vol97
Smells like potential
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2016
- Messages
- 18,353
- Likes
- 67,715
I have no doubt that there are certain athletes that played at the highest level of their sport in the US that fit the mold of what a soccer player needs to be world class, but being the better athlete does not mean being the better player.. and it 100% doesn’t mean that being the most physically dominate means being the better player.Yes, but you’re ignoring the fact that fitting in athletically with other countries shouldn’t be the goal. If all the top athletes in the U.S. all trained in soccer their entire lives just like they do in other countries around the world, our team would be heads and shoulders above the other countries’ teams in terms of athleticism. We would be able to physically dominate.
Some of the greatest to ever play the game were not physical specimens or the greatest athletes in the game. Messi was 5’9” and 160 pounds soaking wet yet he made even guys that looked like they were made in a lab fall at his feet. Neymar, Pele, and Maradona, were 5’7”, 5’8” and 5’9” respectively. These 4 were never the fastest or strongest yet they are 4 out of the 5 main people that are consistently mentioned in the GOAT conversation for soccer. There have been loads of better all around athletes in the sport that rival US athletes over the years yet no one has matched what they could do.
This isnt me advocating that the sport in the US doesn’t need more pure athletes. I just think there is a false image of what that means for us on the world stage for soccer.