Recruiting Football Talk VIII

#50,907
#50,907
Orange. said:
WTF.

Judge gives preliminary approval for NCAA settlement reestablishing and greatly expanding NCAA's historically abused enforcement and selective non-enforcement powers

The judge did not say why she changed her mind. NCAA politician and president Baker said he is "delighted." Nothing is final at this point.

Please note that the regulatory portion of this deal is the forward-looking part of the deal. The NCAA has already botched for the entire past decade managment of this issue and the funds to be paid out as a result of the NCAA's massive fail is a given.

Backstory:

www.usatoday.com

Lawyers in NCAA athlete-compensation antitrust cases adjust settlement proposal with judge

Lawyers involved in a proposed settlement of athlete-compensation antitrust cases against the NCAA and power conferences filed documents with judge.
www.usatoday.com

www.usatoday.com

NCAA antitrust settlement effort challenged by lawyer from Ed O'Bannon case

The NCAA's effort to get approval of a legal settlement in its athlete-compensation cases faces opposition from the lawyer in the Ed O'Bannon case.
www.usatoday.com
Click to expand...
Appears the change was not preventing collectives but making those agreements go through the ncaa enforcement system. Hmmm. As opposed to an approval system? I’d rather those deals need to be approved rather than th ncaa be able to Willy nilly sanction and collect revenue through the arbitration of those sanctions.

MULARKEY

This whole thing is just “how do we legally get to control and profit from this industry while appeasing grievances and creating the illusion that college athletes will be able to profit from the full market value (and not more 🙄) of their name image and likeness.

MULARKEY
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange. and Volunteer821
#50,913
#50,913
vol_in_ga said:
Appears the change was not preventing collectives but making those agreements go through the ncaa enforcement system. Hmmm. As opposed to an approval system? I’d rather those deals need to be approved rather than th ncaa be able to Willy nilly sanction and collect revenue through the arbitration of those sanctions.

MULARKEY

This whole thing is just “how do we legally get to control and profit from this industry while appeasing grievances and creating the illusion that college athletes will be able to profit from the full market value (and not more 🙄) of their name image and likeness.

MULARKEY
Click to expand...
Why should the NCAA have right to disapprove and stop an NIL deal. Who st the NCAA surrogate is going to have the details and amounts of every transaction, and are we supposed to believe that info won't make its way to favorites?

The crisis, such as their is, is all the back money the NCAA owes by means of negligence and mismanagement for a decade. There is no need to give the NCAA abundant no regulatory powers. That a whole separate issue they are smuggling in. NIL is going great.

Their obsession with setting caps is just avfancy way of saying re-instituting "bags," so the NCAA surrogate can go back to its crooked enforcement and deliberate non enforcement. imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LaagerVol, TN-POSSUM, smokeyhuntsgators and 7 others
#50,914
#50,914
vol_in_ga said:
They had our whole playbook and signals on their friggin arms, COLOR CODED. What more evidence was needed?
Click to expand...
Also that bruh bought tickets for our game in his usual spot with the best view of signs, which were transferred to someone else, and someone was in the seats. And then the arm bands on national TV.

The fact that the NCAA was never busted SCar or even mentioned this episode which even causal viewers are familiar with from the national broadcast is sufficient reason to say the neither the NCAA (nor a surrogate for them) should EVER regulate enforcement again. For 2 years the NCAA stalled and covered up for Michigan, destroying the integrity of the playoffs and the sport.

And behold: NIL is running fine without the NCAA's rigging.

Michigan also may have hacked our computers. The NCAA and the Feds have completely covered up that HUGE infraction and violation of Federal law. Saban appears to think something like that was going on. Interestingly, he seemed to have an idea of how it was done.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: VolsDoc81TX, rikberry31, Adam Sandler and 2 others
#50,918
#50,918
Orange. said:
Their obsession with setting caps is just avfancy way of saying re-instituting "bags," so the NCAA surrogate can go back to its crooked enforcement and deliberate non enforcement. imo.
Click to expand...
This. The NCAA selective enforcement has bitten them. UT was one of the first to say "stop, you are being obviously unfair, and now we can take you to court over it". Low and behold, once we were able to plead our case to an outside authority the NCAA unwittingly dug their own grave. The fact that Bama/UGA was never investigated, Michigan investigation drug out, UNC academic scandal was covered up, USCjr was never investigated in '22, etc...stunk to high heaven and now there is nothing they can do to stop anyone. Measured and fair enforcement across the board and building a rulebook that was based in common sense would have stopped all this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LaagerVol, rikberry31 and Volunteer821
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top