Wonder if that Oregon State RB would wanna come here next year since we’re losing Sampson more than likely.
Hankerson is a beast. Currently a Jr.
TBF, Heard is a much better run blocker than pass blocker this year. That just stood out to me in that video. Hopefully it clicks or if there is an injury he kicks it quickly. OL needs to get better yesterday.I was just about to post that. Not only did he not even get a hand on anyone, but he was probably in Sampson's way. He was fine the first three games of the season...now it's like he's not even trying sometimes.
From Chat GPT lol
Over the past two seasons, Tennessee's football opponents have had surprisingly few live ball penalties, especially in key games. Notably, in three SEC road games during the 2023 season, Tennessee's opponents were called for just one live ball penalty across all games, which contributed to significant frustration among fans and coaches alike. This pattern of minimal penalties on opponents extended to several critical matchups, including games against Alabama and Kentucky, where Tennessee's opponents escaped without any live ball penalties despite numerous apparent infractions.
At home, Tennessee's opponents faced a higher penalty count, with two SEC opponents (South Carolina and Texas A&M) being flagged for a combined 12 live ball penalties for 118 yards. However, the lack of penalty enforcement on the road has been a recurring theme, raising concerns about the fairness of officiating during these games.
Tennessee fans and analysts have expressed frustration over the lack of holding and pass interference calls against their opponents. The main reasons cited are perceived officiating inconsistencies and bias, particularly in SEC road games. For instance, during several recent matchups, including against Alabama and Kentucky, Tennessee's defensive players, especially pass rushers like Tyler Baron, were frequently held without any penalties being called. This lack of enforcement was noted even when holds were clear on replay.
Some argue that this pattern is part of a broader issue with SEC officiating, where the home teams, or high-profile programs, seem to benefit from leniency. Tennessee's head coach Josh Heupel has avoided directly accusing referees of bias, but the statistical disparity in penalty calls—particularly live ball penalties—has been striking. Over a stretch of road games, Tennessee’s opponents were called for almost no significant infractions, despite visual evidence of violations.
This has led to speculation among fans and commentators that officials might be more hesitant to call penalties on certain teams or in certain environments, which can tilt games in favor of Tennessee’s opponents. However, this remains a matter of perception, and no formal conclusions have been drawn regarding deliberate officiating bias.
Fair enough.doubt we'll need a proven plug and play the way bishop is coming along. IMO our staff banks on him developing his pass blocking and is 1a with seldon and lewis rounding out our stable. Keith needs another year, and we are bringing Baker in so there's our two guys in development. Could see us targeting a d2/socon kid for depth so as to not scare anyone off. IMO they'd rather take another HS than portal anyways but we'll see how things shake in the '25 class, looking unlikely the further we get in season, but someone could always emerge
I can say with certainty that there were several no-callls on obvious fouls on Texas A&M's in Knoxville in last year. No-call DPIs in favor of Texas A&M was a major influence on that game even being close.From Chat GPT lol
Over the past two seasons, Tennessee's football opponents have had surprisingly few live ball penalties, especially in key games. Notably, in three SEC road games during the 2023 season, Tennessee's opponents were called for just one live ball penalty across all games, which contributed to significant frustration among fans and coaches alike. This pattern of minimal penalties on opponents extended to several critical matchups, including games against Alabama and Kentucky, where Tennessee's opponents escaped without any live ball penalties despite numerous apparent infractions.
At home, Tennessee's opponents faced a higher penalty count, with two SEC opponents (South Carolina and Texas A&M) being flagged for a combined 12 live ball penalties for 118 yards. However, the lack of penalty enforcement on the road has been a recurring theme, raising concerns about the fairness of officiating during these games.
Tennessee fans and analysts have expressed frustration over the lack of holding and pass interference calls against their opponents. The main reasons cited are perceived officiating inconsistencies and bias, particularly in SEC road games. For instance, during several recent matchups, including against Alabama and Kentucky, Tennessee's defensive players, especially pass rushers like Tyler Baron, were frequently held without any penalties being called. This lack of enforcement was noted even when holds were clear on replay.
Some argue that this pattern is part of a broader issue with SEC officiating, where the home teams, or high-profile programs, seem to benefit from leniency. Tennessee's head coach Josh Heupel has avoided directly accusing referees of bias, but the statistical disparity in penalty calls—particularly live ball penalties—has been striking. Over a stretch of road games, Tennessee’s opponents were called for almost no significant infractions, despite visual evidence of violations.
This has led to speculation among fans and commentators that officials might be more hesitant to call penalties on certain teams or in certain environments, which can tilt games in favor of Tennessee’s opponents. However, this remains a matter of perception, and no formal conclusions have been drawn regarding deliberate officiating bias.