Recruiting Football Talk VIII

[VolGee4]

There is 0 chance he received more money than Bryce Underwood.

First, no one but the collectives truly know what these deals are worth. Second, they are going to be structured over 3-4 years, so total number is a little misleading. Third, I have read that Underwood's deal has a bunch of incentives. Finally, regardless if Sanders is first or 5th, he's probably first at his position and means we stepped up and paid for someone we wanted.

 

[Adam Sandler]

View attachment 719649View attachment 719650

 

[DD4ME]

First, no one but the collectives truly know what these deals are worth. Second, they are going to be structed over 3-4 years, so total number is a little misleading. Third, I have read that Underwood's deal has a bunch of incentives. Finally, regardless if Sanders is first or 5th, he's probably first at his position and means we stepped up and paid for someone we wanted.

This

 

[screenthis]

side note...Dalton looked very athletic last night in the Lakers game...yet I do expect them to trade him sooner rather than later, unfortunately.

 

[JohnnyD1024]

 

[screenthis]

Au contrair...I have asked a zebra to be a dog...

 

[DD4ME]

 

[SSVol]

He will be a fine addition to somebody's practice squad.

 

[TN-POSSUM]

 

[peaygolf]

If that's the case.......good for him

But Nico's jersey better be spotless at the end of every game. If not.............Criticize away. Open season, Freshman or not!

 

[Cosmo Kramer]

You do if you want an NFL Paycheck

 

[Dobbs 4 Heisman]

Name calling. The last resort for someone getting obliterated in am argument

Not my fault that he mentioned a completely different series. And how can I get obliterated for something I never argued. What he did was create a strawman. Pulled up stats from the 2010 matchup between the Thunder and Lakers while I was talking about the 2012 matchup.

 

[knoxvol52]

If that's the case.......good for him

But Nico's jersey better be spotless at the end of every game. If not.............Criticize away. Open season, Freshman or not!

C.J. Stroud made $2.5 million in 2024 season and got criticism from many media individuals. I hate the Texans but he should make more than ANY college QB....

 

[TN-POSSUM]

I'm worried about the lack of diversity in your worry circle.

 

[Ten_Titans]

Au contrair...I have asked a zebra to be a dog...View attachment 719672

The zebra appears to be killing it too,tbh

 

[MoCo_Vol]

side note...Dalton looked very athletic last night in the Lakers game...yet I do expect them to trade him sooner rather than later, unfortunately.

Not sure he's 3 years younger than Austin Reaves and the 3rd youngest player on the team. If the goal is to try and "reset" and get younger for the post Lebron era they might look to move AR instead. There is about a 10m per year difference in contract too.

DK is also the only Laker to appear in all 48 games for the team.

 

[SergeantVol]

This can't be right?

Spyre and our collective are always cheap

How dare you go against the negative comments...errr I mean realistic comments on this board!!!!

 

[PKT_VOL]

LeBron's not versatile. He plays the same style. Point forward. 1-4 pick n roll. Shooters spacing the floor for his drives. You're confusing filling up the box score with versatility. LeBron is not a great post player. He's not good from the mid-range. He isn't a great ball handler with killer dribble moves. He's literally putting his head down and driving to the rim with power every play. In many ways he's the perimeter version of Shaq. Power and strength with little in skillful moves and grace.

Kevin Durant is a versatile player. He can do what LeBron does but he can also play like Kobe if he needs to. Or he can play like Ray Allen. He's great with the ball and without. He can drive. Shoot midrange. And the 3ball.

It is almost like you don't even read the post you are responding to. See the bold you glossed over then described:

LeBron's greatest strength isn't his statistics; it's his versatility. Neither Jordon's strength (his killer instinct) or LeBron's strength (his versatility via his athleticism) show up in box scores. It is just a matter of whether you value the former or the latter more.

Lebron is simply a freak of nature. He would probably have been a HOF TE had he choose football over basketball.

His unique athleticism enabled him to play all five positions, defensively and offensively, at a level we have never seen. Also, his athleticism fueled his insane longevity.

 

[MoCo_Vol]

Not my fault that he mentioned a completely different series. And how can I get obliterated for something I never argued. What he did was create a strawman. Pulled up stats from the 2010 matchup between the Thunder and Lakers while I was talking about the 2012 matchup.

As much hopping around as you do when trolling who knows what series you meant.

Harden was dominating Kobe Bryant's Lakers in a playoff series. It wasn't just potential. He was proving it. He just needed his own team for the opportunity to show it statistically. No different than Kobe needing Shaq to leave to show the full breadth of his talents.

Notice the bold part...no mention of which series you was referencing, Harden was with OKC just 3 seasons and only played the Lakers in 2 series during his time there. I went with the first one since the discussion was about how good he was early in his career.

And since you're talking about the 2012 series... something to point out is that of his combined 80 total points scored nearly half (37) were from the free throw line. He shot 25% from deep for the series and just 35.8% FG.

Russ & KD carried and honestly the biggest reason OKC won was Ibaka taking Gasol to task. He averaged 4 blocks a game.

Go get them eyes checked...and NEXT time you need to clarify what series you're discussing cause ain't no one dumb enough to try and read your mind.

 

[TheRain]

I'm worried about the lack of diversity in your worry circle.

I'm worried about the lack of pumpkins in the room.

 

[Dobbs 4 Heisman]

Guess you need to be taken to school yet again.

Points: LBJ (27), KD (27)
FG%- LBJ (51), KD (50)
Minutes- LBJ (38), KD (37)
3pt %- LBJ (35), KD (39)
Rebounds- LBJ (7.5), KD (7)
Steals- LBJ (1.5), KD (1.1)
Assists- LBJ (7.4), (4.4)

LeBron is the better shooter, plays more minutes, is the better passer and defender. KD is the better 3pt shooter. But KD isn’t a leader. He went to GS but Curry was already well established. Had KD never went to GS, he would have zero championships.

Are you 12 years old? Cause I doubt anyone older than that can be this clueless? What do stats have to do with versatility? We're talking skill sets here not box scores. Also I don't know what leaderships or championships have to do with the conversation either. I never claimed KD was better than LeBron. I just said he was a more versatile player.

KD can play both inside and outside at a high level. While LeBron is primarily an inside player. You brought up field goal percentage which doesn't say anything about versatility. Shaq for example shoots a higher percentage than LeBron and KD from the field, does that make Shaq a more versatile scorer? No. He shoots a higher percentage because almost all his shots are in the paint. The players with the highest field goal percentages tend to be the players with the most limited games not the most versatile.

KD can also play off the ball at a higher level than LeBron. He's one of the best catch n shoot players of all-time. KD can also run an offense and play pick n roll basketball effectively. He's also a good passer. There's nothing he can't do at a high level offensively. LeBron on the other hand isn't as good off the ball. He's not as good in catch n shoot opportunities. He's not as good shooting free throws. He's not as good in the midrange. He also doesn't have as many dribble moves as KD. All in all KD is the more versatile player.

 

[InVOLuntary]

How many here actually went to the 1982 World's Fair?

I worked there as a photographer in the Antique Photo Booth.

 

[Dobbs 4 Heisman]

As much hopping around as you do when trolling who knows what series you meant.



Notice the bold part...no mention of which series you was referencing, Harden was with OKC just 3 seasons and only played the Lakers in 2 series during his time there. I went with the first one since the discussion was about how good he was early in his career.

And since you're talking about the 2012 series... something to point out is that of his combined 80 total points scored nearly half (37) were from the free throw line. He shot 25% from deep for the series and just 35.8% FG.

Russ & KD carried and honestly the biggest reason OKC won was Ibaka taking Gasol to task. He averaged 4 blocks a game.

Go get them eyes checked...and NEXT time you need to clarify what series you're discussing cause ain't no one dumb enough to try and read your mind.

I thought it was pretty obvious that if you get dominated in a playoff series you lose the series easily not win it 4-2.

Why would you assume the series I said Harden dominated Kobe would be the one the Lakers won 4-2 rather than the one they lost 4-1 just two years later?

Common sense people. Use it.

 

[screenthis]

Not sure he's 3 years younger than Austin Reaves and the 3rd youngest player on the team. If the goal is to try and "reset" and get younger for the post Lebron era they might look to move AR instead. There is about a 10m per year difference in contract too.

DK is also the only Laker to appear in all 48 games for the team.

One article mentioned that DK was initially part of the Luka deal. Not sure if that's true.

 

[Dobbs 4 Heisman]

First, no one but the collectives truly know what these deals are worth. Second, they are going to be structured over 3-4 years, so total number is a little misleading. Third, I have read that Underwood's deal has a bunch of incentives. Finally, regardless if Sanders is first or 5th, he's probably first at his position and means we stepped up and paid for someone we wanted.

This actually makes us look bad. We overpaid massively if he's making more than QBs rated ahead of him.