Ulysees E. McGill
This season is for you Sweets
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2009
- Messages
- 55,113
- Likes
- 145,645
fypAncient Egyptian architect: "Do you know how to build a pyramid?"
Ancient Egyptian builder: "But them damn aliens keep taking my abacus. I dont know no maths.'
Decent data if maybe not a touch obvious. As a math guy i never hate on people trying to find rhyme or reason, but I know some don't like him.
Who would be the "owners" in this situation though? Who would force a lockout?Yeah, you can’t tie team rules to their NIL deals, because the NIL is supposed to be separate from the team. We all know it isn’t, but legally it is supposed to be. The players have all of the leverage.
Has to be some sort of CBA in the future
Wasn't you one of the individuals on board with players getting compensated financially? Now that they are and no rules are keeping this chaos organized you're pissed off because players aren't being loyal. What the hell did you expect with 17-22 year old individuals? Fans can't have their cake and eat it too.That tracks..
Schools would be the owners and it wouldn’t be much different than the pros. Pro owners make big money off the athletes too. It would just all have to be bargained. It is definitely more messy than pro sports because of all of the title IX and all of the non-revenue producing sports.Who would be the "owners" in this situation though? Who would force a lockout?
I find it hard to believe schools would enforce a lockout like pro teams/leagues would because they make so much $$ off college athletics.
I think the disconnect isnt that the players are getting paid, it’s the insane way the NCAA and schools have gone about it that created absolute chaos. It didn’t have to be the Wild West.Wasn't you one of the individuals on board with players getting compensated financially? Now that they are and no rules are keeping this chaos organized you're pissed off because players aren't being loyal. What the hell did you expect with 17-22 year old individuals? Fans can't have their cake and eat it too.
What we could end up with is schools could start forfeiting games due to losing too many players to other teams or their own players sitting out cause they are not happy with their NIL deals. This in turn would cause the other teams to have fewer games and TV would lose a lot of TV revenue. Maybe that would finally cause some change.Who would be the "owners" in this situation though? Who would force a lockout?
I find it hard to believe schools would enforce a lockout like pro teams/leagues would because they make so much $$ off college athletics.
Once again what did individuals expect when there were no rules and handlers and agents could be in the ears of these young men and women. I agree there should be structure but until there is these players are going to do what their handlers tell them..I think the disconnect isnt that the players are getting paid, it’s the insane way the NCAA and schools have gone about it that created absolute chaos. It didn’t have to be the Wild West.
I don’t recall anyone desiring for the players to get paid with no rules in place.Once again what did individuals expect when there were no rules and handlers and agents could be in the ears of these young men and women.
And, that is the key. I wanted players to not 'starve' and for universities to not be sanctioned becuase players got Shoes. But I did not want a wild, wild west approach with not rules and players pulling tricks like Gibson. It will spoil the game that I love. I'll admit I preferred the games of old with smaller, regional conferences and more player loyalty to a school (arguable).Wasn't you one of the individuals on board with players getting compensated financially? Now that they are and no rules are keeping this chaos organized you're pissed off because players aren't being loyal. What the hell did you expect with 17-22 year old individuals? Fans can't have their cake and eat it too.