Recruiting Forum Football Talk II

Status
Not open for further replies.
#203,601
#203,601
jakez4ut said:
for what their goals and purpose seem to be, yeah, it sure is...........
tenor.gif
Click to expand...
Their goals and purpose of reporting? Yeah
 
#203,602
#203,602
VolGee4 said:
There is no way it is available to us common folks before the summer of next year. They can't manufacture enough.
Click to expand...
...fast enough. 20m viles a month gets us to about 1/3 of the population sometime around spring....and after prioritizing distribution.....so yeah...at best, we're in to summer before it's rolling out to the gen pop....fall before we're able to reach 2/3....

that's still pretty amazing.

plus we don't know what other companies will get invovled or what else might come from a manufacturing/distribution standpoint....they could get other companies/countries invovled in the production. plus other countries/companies are developing treatments/vaccines as well.

lot's of variables in play....

all designed to make sure next football season goes off w/out a freaking hitch. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: HeadVol77, Easttnken and VolGee4
#203,605
#203,605
Paper_Towel said:
I don’t understand these sharters wanting Tee gone. Dude’s a good WR coach who’s magically bad as soon as he comes to UT?
Click to expand...
Truth, when your QB can't hit an open receiver the receivers look bad. Tee isn't the problem. I think there is a problem and friction within the staff going on. I haven't seen any reports stating so but something isn't right.
 
#203,606
#203,606
barrylee said:
One thing that doesn’t add up on Chaney to me is that he is totally responsible for the unimaginative offense. The same guy who use to get ripped for abandoning the run is all of a sudden running on 3rd and 9?
Doesn’t add up..
Click to expand...
My guess is that the starting QB was pushed on him so he tried to minimize turnovers.
 
#203,609
#203,609
Hubbs thoughts on staff rejecting pay cuts...

Total tone deaf decision. And not just from a perception standpoint or an optics standpoint.

Let me first say that Fulmer, Pruitt, nor the University leadership couldn't make them do it. They could implore them to do it but they couldn't make them.

The perception is bad that will get the football program some national exposure today and tomorrow on gameday so that's not good.

But it's also not good internally now that everyone knows those guys refused to take the cut. They said no when the secretaries did and the recruiting office who does so much of the leg work for them did. The equipment staff. The guys in the video department who give them all they need/want to study opponents and themselves from practices. The list goes on and on of people who had to take a pay cut but guys making hundreds of thousands more didn't take one. You got coaches worried about their sports as they see the department losing 30-40 million and they see other power 5 schools already cutting sports.

So what about the unity in the athletic department overall where every coach in every other sport took a pay cut and 8 football assistants didn't. Everyone knows football drives the train when it comes to revenue and supporting other sports. Refusal to help out the athletic department by these 8 doesn't send a message that they care about anything else.

Jus a poor decision from these 8 individuals from an external and internal standpoint.
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: TNrockytop4ever, captainfalcon777, 85SugarVol and 47 others
#203,617
#203,617
This might explain some of the issues we are seeing on the field and coaching. They reject pay cuts in October. Then train went off the rails. You know it got out before now internally about who did and didn’t take the pay cuts. Granted we don’t know the financial situations of those involved especially the first yr guys that made a lot of financial sacrifices prior to finally receiving their payday but the Ansleys, Friends, Chaneys, and Weinkes that have been in this business for several years should have accepted pay cuts whether it was the proposed one or a negotiated one. If your bosses did it then you should too. Only Fulmer, Pruitt, Tee and Jay declining money is a bad look and probably why someone released this info today. I’d expect some of these guys won’t be around next yr
 
  • Like
Reactions: CreiveHallVol, VOLSONLY, HeadVol77 and 3 others
#203,619
#203,619
Coaches in general are a high ego bunch. The successful ones are able to control that ego. The ones that can't see themselves as always right and untouchable. I'll take Martin and Graham in a heartbeat. Even Pruitt refusing to take his raise gives him a little more Grace. Chaney---I can call Inside Zone 3 times and punt. Again, IF the financial climate is not right and Coach Pruitt is retained then give him one more shot at putting a staff together while at the same time give him certain benchmarks that have to be met in 2021 and roll on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VOLSONLY, HeadVol77, JAllen18 and 4 others
New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.

VN Store



Back
Top