VolNRaleighNC
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2006
- Messages
- 8,170
- Likes
- 17,065
Not overthinking at all. It's gaining a small advantage. Playing for OT is just playing for another 50/50 situation.
In this specific game UF defense was GASSED. Playing for the win made sense.
Yeah, that’s a negative ghost rider.My only question at this point would be looking at this SEC championship game - do you think Pruitt can build a team that looks and plays like that -
Can he build a championship team?
If your answer is no (and it should be based on the past 3 years) you have to move on.
My only question at this point would be looking at this SEC championship game - do you think Pruitt can build a team that looks and plays like that -
Can he build a championship team?
If your answer is no (and it should be based on the past 3 years) you have to move on.
My only question at this point would be looking at this SEC championship game - do you think Pruitt can build a team that looks and plays like that -
Can he build a championship team?
If your answer is no (and it should be based on the past 3 years) you have to move on.
Think it's beyond dumb to put yourself in a position to have to make a 2 point conversion to just force OT. If you don't want to play for OT, ya kick the PAT the first time then worry about going for 2 if you score again.
IMO, It's hard for us to hold it against someone who had violations, "did his time" and trying to make amends when we're standing in poo ourselves...He’s the “home run” guy.
Hard to sell the fat cats on bringing in a coach who was also under an investigation
He’s my first choice tho
Hubbs made a mention which is important
Defense these days is about holding teams to FGs in the red zone and creating turnovers. It isn’t about preventing yards. The coaches themselves even admit this now, even guys like Saban.The decision makers in Knoxville needed to watch tonight. Tape their eyelids open so they couldn’t miss a snap. You don’t win in college football with defense anymore. You have to go and find someone who can put a lot of points on the board. Period.
I’d be good with Gus. We need stability, and he could provide that.
Freeze would be my first choice, however, I don’t think the people in power have the cajones to make that move.
Hard no for me O’Brien.