1)Thats like holding Bobby Bowden accountable for FSU's problems now. Don't be ridiculous.I'm not saying Phil played a role in this specific scandal of paying players.
I'm saying Phil played a role in 1) the initial falling off of the program in the late 2000s and 2) he hired Pruitt/listened to people who told him he should hire Pruitt.
That's where I'm at.Kiffin and Freeze are the best shots!!
I suppose the only negative thing that could outweigh a national title is bringing the program down in some kind of Penn St/Baylor-type scandal. Phil hasn't done that. So it isn't that the bad outweighs the good, I agree with that.True, but maybe that’s not well known to everyone. I just don’t think you fire Fulmer twice. On paper the good outweighs the bad. Especially when he’s the last coach to bring anything good to the program at all.
Napier apparently is going to try and wait it out for LSU, Florida, Clemson, or Alabama.
Isn't Neal Brown 4 years ago similar to Napier? I know he hasn't coached across the country as much, but they strike me as being similar. Any coach that can take Troy into LSU and win has me intrigued. West Virginia is a hard place to win at. If the first tier of most of our coaching wants fall through, I think UT could do worse than Neal Brown.
I‘m still trying to figure out why they took questions yesterday. I thought the statements that Plowman and Boyd gave were enough, probably overkill actually. Then you have Fulmer up there having to answer questions describing Pruitt’s tenure and having no place to go with any of the answers. I really don’t understand why we keep repeating the same mistakes. They did this same sort of thing w/ the Title 9 round table deal. It comes across as very uncomfortable.There's also no reason to trot his ass up there and throw him a parade for this absolute cluster **** of a situation that is on him.