TN-POSSUM
2nd CHRONICLES ch 7 v 14 (KJV)
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2012
- Messages
- 18,762
- Likes
- 114,308
Year, was just looking into candidates who had worked with Steele. Seems that Napier could be a possibility.
He’s been available since he left OU....where OU people were beyond ready to see him go.
I’m not saying he’s Dooley or Pruitt. He was a very good coach at one point in time. He would be a good hire but i believe he is miles away from urban Meyer who is a comparable example. If we’re ponying up 8-10 mil... i want to go steal someone’s coach that is winning now.
Stoops was reinvigorated late in his tenure by Lincoln Riley, who was seen OU people (and even probably Stoops himself) as someone who could and would succeed him.He’s been available since he left OU....where OU people were beyond ready to see him go.
I’m not saying he’s Dooley or Pruitt. He was a very good coach at one point in time. He would be a good hire but i believe he is miles away from urban Meyer who is a comparable example. If we’re ponying up 8-10 mil... i want to go steal someone’s coach that is winning now.
I don't know that it is, but do you know that it isn't? Is it really so unrealistic that a former player already employed at the university would do them a solid and try to keep the team from completely imploding? I certainly don't think so.
Is it Jim Bob Cooter time?I am not saying we're hiring Steele, I'm not at all.
But the same people who I talked to who told me we were firing Pruitt - something I never wavered on - are saying Steele is a very realistic outcome.
Regardless, it is very weird that we're allowing him to hire defensive coaches. Yes, Steele is a great defensive coordinator. Yes, Rodney Garner is a great defensive line coach. Sure, Kevin Simon is a VFL and qualified enough to coach linebackers here. All those things are true.
But, simply put, you have to allow your head coach to make these decisions. So maybe we do have someone lined up? Chadwell makes some sense - or a coach with Vol ties we've not thought about yet. But the fact you are hiring assistants for him before he gets here 1) means he's not putting his name on these hires and 2) sends a signal you already don't trust him enough to make his own staff decisions.
Napier and Steele have coached together. It's probably going to take big money to get Napier to come in and clean this mess. I could see him being the guy, the search firm doing the due diligence, and in the meantime getting the start of staff moves on the defensive side of the ball in place.
Hubbs strictly said it’s for roster stability and to keep from other players transferring. Boyd specifically said they’re looking to hire a proven winner that’s been a HC. Steele does not fall under that. IMO he’s the last option if everyone else doesn’t take the job.You don't give an interim HC the ability to hire coaches unless you're the permanent HC or if it's been approved by the next HC. Period.
Bob Stoops figured he wouldn't coach again. But several key factors led him back into footballWho?
Question ... not necessarily for you (although feel free to answer, I just thought of it when I read your post) ... Does the search firm recommend guys that they know will come if negotiations go well, or do they just recommend guys they think we should pursue?
It would be pretty silly to pay a search firm for a list of guys who aren't even interested ... just asking.
It’s not happening, so doesn’t really matter.He’s been available since he left OU....where OU people were beyond ready to see him go.
I’m not saying he’s Dooley or Pruitt. He was a very good coach at one point in time. He would be a good hire but i believe he is miles away from urban Meyer who is a comparable example. If we’re ponying up 8-10 mil... i want to go steal someone’s coach that is winning now.