BogeyVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2012
- Messages
- 846
- Likes
- 1,388
Or they could realize it is in the interest of encouraging greater compliance among its members to show leniency when a school takes the steps we did. If you give a near death penalty to a University that did it all it could once it learned of the violations, you will have more schools covering up, failing to report, etc. I have to believe the Glazier Firm that has been advising them from early on took all these factors into account.This time we handed them the cattleprod before we bent over.
They could take pity on us. I'm going with that, even though I know there's more to find. Kicking us when we're so down would be unsporting.
Literally every coach in the conference is hoping we hire him. If he is such a hot name why did Auburn not push hard? S Car? Vandy? He wasn't even on 2 of those boards if I remember correctly.Name the last time we haven‘t sucked. The guy is a football coach who has won everywhere he’s ever been, with less.
Agreed, but we haven’t been there in a long time.I'm sick of the type of crap Dennis Dodd keeps putting out there. The worst that Tennessee should be in any given year is 7-5. We can stay in that place for an extended period of time, but the worst we should be is 7-5.
Losses:
Florida
Georgia
Alabama
a rotating West opponent who happens to be good that year
a P5 OOC opponent who happens to be good that year
Wins:
OOC creampuff #1
OOC creampuff #2
OOC creampuff #3
Vandy
Kentucky
South Carolina
Mizzou
Where am I going wrong here? Even the harshest critics of our fanbase and program I think couldn't disagree with that. Would any of them actually suggest that over a long period of time, it makes sense for us to have losing records to schools like Vandy, South Carolina, and Mizzou?
According to ESPN the NCAA started the investigation of USC in April of 2006 and it lasted for 4 years. I don't see anything about USC conducting its own investigation first and turning it over voluntarily to the NCAA.